Issue number: resolves#16304, resolves#20681
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Split Pane assumes that Menu is a child of the Split Pane. This means
that CSS selectors and JS queries only check for children instead of
descendants. When a Menu is encapsulated in a component that component
can itself show up as an element in the DOM depending on the
environment. For example, both Angular and Web components show up as
elements in the DOM. This causes the Menu to not work because it is no
longer a child of the Split Pane.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Menu can now be used as a descendant of Split Pane. The following
changes make this possible:
1. When the menu is loaded, it queries the ancestor Split Pane. If one
is found, it sets `isPaneVisible` depending on if the split pane is
visible or not.
2. Any changes to the split pane visibility state after the menu is
loaded will be handled through the `ionSplitPaneVisible` event.
3. A menu is now considered to be a pane if it is inside of a split pane
4. Related CSS no longer uses `::slotted` which only targets children.
The CSS was moved into the menu stylesheets. I consider the coupling
here to be valuable as menu and split pane are often used together. We
also already have style coupling between the two components, so this
isn't anything new.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
There are no known changes to the public API or public behavior.
However, there are two risks here:
1. There is an unknown risk into how this change impacts nested split
panes. This isn't an explicitly supported feature, but it technically
works in Ionic now. We don't know if anyone is actually implementing
this pattern. We'd like to evaluate use cases for nested split panes
submitted by the community before we try to account for this
functionality in menu and split pane.
5. There may be some specificity changes due to the new CSS. CSS was
moved from split pane to menu so it could work with encapsulated
components:
`:host(.split-pane-visible) ::slotted(.split-pane-side)` has a
specificity of 0-1-1
`:host(.menu-page-visible.menu-pane-side)` has a specificity of 0-1-0
There shouldn't be any changes needed to developer code since the
selectors are in the Shadow DOM and developer styles are in the Light
DOM. However, we aren't able to anticipate every edge case so we'd like
to place this in a major release just to be safe.
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.2-dev.11704922151.1fd3369f`
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The light theme tokens are included in the starter apps but not in Ionic
Framework itself.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The light mode tokens are bundled with Ionic Framework. This allows
developers to always have the light mode accessible to them including
the tokens.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: None
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Similar to #28809, in my work for FW-5822, I found that I had unexpected
screenshot diffs. `--ion-color-dark` was not defined in our test
infrastructure, and this toggle icon was therefore displaying in the
wrong color in the tests.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Toggle has the correct icon color even when the --ion-color-dark token
is not defined
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
Introduces style changes if the token is undefined, but it should always
be defined in real-world uses.
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: None
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In my work for FW-5822, I found that I had unexpected screenshot diffs.
`--ion-color-light` was not defined in our test infrastructure, and the
white fallback for the datetime background was causing snapshots to have
a white background when they should have had a light one.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Datetime has the correct background color even when the
`--ion-color-light` token is not defined
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
Introduces style changes if the token is undefined, but it should always
be defined in real-world uses.
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Our theme tests currently consume an internal dark theme. This was
needed to add light/dark theme tests prior to us shipping separate
stylesheets to developers. However, now that these stylesheets have been
created we should always be testing with them so we can catch any bugs
in the dark mode stylesheet.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Remove the custom dark.css file and removed references to it
- Added a TODO to do the same thing for the light theme once FW-5862 is
done.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#28534
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Page views in Ionic need to be rendered as a child of
`ion-router-outlet` in order for page transitions and swipe to go back
to function correctly. However, Angular always inserts components as
siblings of the insertion point. Previously, the insertion point was
`ion-router-outlet` (the host element). This meant that page views were
mounted as siblings of `ion-router-outlet`. We then added code to move
the component inside of `ion-router-outlet`.
This caused two issues:
1. A DOM tree mismatch during hydration (the linked issue) because
hydration is expecting the page view to be a sibling of the router
outlet, but Ionic moves the view around in the DOM.
2. A performance issue where all components effectively have
`connectedCallback` fired twice. This callback runs when the component
is added to the DOM. On initial mount, `connectedCallback` for each
component runs. Once the page view is moved, the elements are removed
from the DOM (thus causing `disconnectedCallback` to run), and then
added to the correct location in the DOM which causes
`connectedCallback` to run again.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- IonRouterOutlet now renders a `ng-container`. This appears as a
comment in the DOM inside of `ion-router-outlet`. This comment is used
as the injection point for adding new views. The new views are added as
siblings of the comment, but since the comment is inside of
`ion-router-outlet` then the views themselves are inside of
`ion-router-outlet` too.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
This doesn't cause any known breaking changes. However, the placement of
views is pretty critical to the functionality of Ionic, so I wanted to
ship this in a major release so we have a solid public testing period
before the code is considered stable.
We already have test coverage that verifies page views are mounted in
the correct order, so I did not add more tests for this.
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: 7.6.2-dev.11704390532.1202188d
Testing:
1. Clone and install dependencies for
https://github.com/bashoogzaad/ionic-ssr-test
2. Run `npm run dev:ssr`.
3. Open app in a browser. Observe that error noted in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28534#issue-1995002926
appears.
4. Install dev build.
5. Run `npm run dev:ssr`. Observe that the error noted in the original
issue does not appear.
Note: The Angular SSR package does not support Web Components. As a
result, there are other errors you will encounter. However, I still
think it's worth fixing this issue a) in the event that the Angular SSR
package adds support for Web Components and b) to get the performance
gain of not having to re-mount components.
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The team would like to ensure that Ionic Framework components that use
an Ionic color (primary, secondary, etc) on top of a contrast color pass
minimum contrast ratios as defined in the WCAG.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Introduces a revised set of Ionic colors that pass AA color contrast
guidelines when with the appropriate contrast.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandy@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Shawn Taylor <shawn@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The picker heading level is currently an `h2`, where the other component
headings are `h4`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates the heading level for Picker to `h4`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Buttons slotted in the start/end slots of input, textarea, or select
have a lot of excess padding that can cause them to look misaligned from
other pieces such as the control's label, especially when using
`fill="clear"`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
Padding removed, and a border radius added so that non-clear buttons as
well as the focus state on clear buttons still look okay. Existing
screenshot tests have also been updated to include buttons (non-clear
ones so you can see the border radius in the screenshots).
Let me know if you think this should go on a feature branch instead. I
chose `main` because the current experience looks somewhat broken and we
just did a minor release recently, but this could be considered a
notable enough behavior change.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
While working on an unrelated task, I noticed the list items in the list
starter app run off the page. This is due to the text wrapping behavior
in v7.6 where we allows the labels to grow/shrink. However, we do not
set a limit on how much they can grow. This means that child elements
inside of `ion-label` with long text can cause the label container to
grow indefinitely.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Labels in item have a max-width of 100%
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.1-dev.11702498225.1ad6eda6`
| before | after |
| - | - |
| 
| 
|
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
This best practice currently resides in our internal testing process
docs. I think this is valuable information for contributors to have as
well, so I've added it to our public best practices doc.
The team had feedback during a sprint retro that the breaking change
process documentation was a bit spread out. In particular, some team
members were not clear that you need to a) update the breaking.md file
and b) add the "BREAKING CHANGE" comment to the commit description.
This PR adds both of these things are comments for awareness.
Issue number: resolves#24905, resolves#26840, resolves#15710
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The current picker is only displayed as an overlay which makes it
impossible to use inline with the rest of the application. Additionally,
there are several bugs and missing features. For example, it is
impossible to know when the value of the picker column has changed using
public APIs. This is valuable for updating other columns in response to
that data.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Introduces `ion-picker` as an inline wheel picker component. The
overlay picker is still available using `ion-picker-legacy`.
- The implementation of this component resolves linked bugs. It also
resolves linked features by exposing an `ionChange` event for developers
to listen for.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `7.5.8-dev.11702398696.1ab62ea9`
---------
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: Shawn Taylor <shawn@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Ionic React projects using `@types/react@18.2.43` or greater will run
into a type-check error on build with `IonRouterOutlet` and potentially
other components:
```
Property 'placeholder' is missing in type '{ children: Element[]; }' but required in type 'Pick<IonRouterOutlet & { basePath?: string | undefined; ref?: Ref<any> | undefined; ionPage?: boolean | undefined; } & IonicReactProps & Omit<...>, "color" | ... 254 more ... | "ionPage">'.
```
Definitely typed decided to make a breaking type change in a patch
release:
b954269038
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Patches the type to allow for compatibility between React v16, 17 and
18.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
### Testing
1. Create a new Ionic react project with the "list" template.
2. Run `npm run build`
3. Observe: Exception posted above
4. Install the dev-build
5. Run `npm run build`
6. Observe: No exception, build passes
7. You can additionally serve the app to verify no runtime
exceptions/broken behavior.
Dev-build: `7.6.1-dev.11702322681.17e39348`
Issue number: resolves#21530
---------
## What is the current behavior?
The `box-shadow` and `transform` properties cannot be styled on a menu
when it is inside of a split pane and visible due to the following:
1) The `box-shadow` and `transform` properties are set to `none` with
`!important`
2) The menu itself is not on "top" of the split pane content so the
content hides any box shadow
## What is the new behavior?
- Removes all uses of `!important` in split pane and menu
- Developers will need to change the `z-index` from `0` to `1` on the
`ion-menu` so the menu will sit on top of the split pane and show the
`box-shadow`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Other information
I considered putting the test for this in `split-pane` but I thought
since it was styling the `ion-menu` it should go in menu. I can move
this if others think it makes more sense in `split-pane`.
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
I've noticed a few instances where the team forgets to add the
"resolves" keyword (or similar "closes"/"fixes" keywords) when linking a
PR to an issue. GitHub will not link the PR with the issue and will not
close the issue on PR merge unless one of these keywords is used.
I've updated the PR template to add the "resolves" keyword so team
members don't need to worry about remembering to add it.
Older versions of WebKit used an old `constant()` syntax for safe area
variables: https://caniuse.com/?search=env
As of Safari 11.3, `env()` is supported instead. We haven't supported
Safari 11 in years, so I think this is safe to remove.
Issue number: resolves#24260
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
When replacing a route (`router.push(newRoute, 'none', 'replace')`) the
`RouterDirection` from the route being replaced is being used (if it
exists) instead of the new one the user specifies.
## What is the new behavior?
User-specified `RouteDirection` is used, if it exists. If it doesn't it
falls back to the `RouteDirection` of the route being replaced.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
Please see the following comment for why I think the current behavior is
incorrect, and why this change is needed:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24260#issuecomment-1078960780
---------
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#28633
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28005 I introduced
a fix that causes "clearOnEdit" to not clear input/textarea when the Tab
key was pressed. However, there were several edge cases I missed. For
instance, pressing the "shift" key and then the "tab" key would still
clear the input because "shift" was not explicitly excluded.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Input and textarea now explicitly ignores modifier keys that do not
change the value of the input
- `didInputClearOnEdit` is not set to `true` when an ignored key is
pressed. Otherwise, pressing an ignored key and then an accepted key
would not cause the input to be cleared. For example, pressing "shift",
releasing "shift", then pressing "A" should cause the input to still get
cleared.
- Added test coverage
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Playwright bug report for
a9f34a54f1:
https://github.com/microsoft/playwright/issues/28495
Issue number: resolves#28673
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When reviewing https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28671
I noticed a bug where the custom animation was not used when going back
after a replace.
`handleNavigate` will override whatever is in `incomingRouteParams`.
Since we were passing `routeAnimation` (which is `undefined`), it was
overriding the animation we set in `handleNavigateBack`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `routeAnimation` is no longer overridden
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.1-dev.11702048520.13c82dad`
Issue number: resolves#25839
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Confirming the working day when a datetime using a wheel picker without
an initial value will result in a value of `undefined` instead of the
displayed working day the user sees.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `preferWheel` uses the working value on confirmation
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `7.5.7-dev.11701896424.13d40ac9`
Co-authored-by: liamdebeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Bumps [@axe-core/playwright](https://github.com/dequelabs/axe-core-npm)
from 4.8.1 to 4.8.2.
<details>
<summary>Changelog</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/dequelabs/axe-core-npm/blob/develop/CHANGELOG.md"><code>@axe-core/playwright</code>'s
changelog</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h1>Change Log</h1>
<p>All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
See <a href="https://conventionalcommits.org">Conventional Commits</a>
for commit guidelines.</p>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/dequelabs/axe-core-npm/commits">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
We currently apply a workaround to `ion-select` so it can wrap correctly
inside of `ion-item`:
357b8b2beb/core/src/components/select/select.scss (L99-L103)
However, this causes issues when a parent element has `display: flex`
because the `ion-select` width becomes 0.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- In order to get the desired behavior, we need the `ion-select` (and
other elements in the default slot) to either truncate or wrap within
its own container and then have the entire container (i.e. the entire
`ion-select`) wrap to the next line once the container is too small.
To achieve this, I needed to set a min-width on `.item-inner` to define
the point at which the element should wrap to the next line. I also
changed the flex basis from `auto` to `0` which means the initial main
size of the flex item will be 0px. In reality, this will be
`--inner-min-width` since we also set `min-width:
var(--inner-min-width)`. I used `0` for simplicity but I can change this
to use the CSS variable if that's more clear. Since we also set
`flex-grow: 1` we indicate that the element can grow from that basis
(but it cannot shrink).
I chose `--inner-min-width: 4rem` to minimize the number of diffs. We
can certainly change this, but it may cause some diffs as certain
elements will start wrapping sooner. I also chose to use `rem` because
having a fixed min-width means that fewer characters are going to fit in
the same space as text scales.
I made this a CSS variable but left it undocumented. If developers need
a way of changing this `min-width` they can request it and we can easily
expose this variable. However, I think `4rem` is small enough that this
should be sufficient.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
The visual diffs here are correct. The table below shows the screenshot
group and an explanation for why the changes are correct.
| Path | Example | Details |
| - | - | - |
| `disabled` |
[Link](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28631/files#diff-d529716f95f7a7aa82c88588104220775b728af67077f48cd47a8afa04423143)
| The searchbar is able to shrink slightly to fit on the same line as
the checkbox at the bottom. |
| `highlight` |
[Link](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28631/files#diff-0b64f24c91393923701d1ced4e330a1c6b926d72ee461b8ab1e135e708be3457)
| We're changing how small the main content can get, so the input is
only wrapping once it gets to `--inner-min-width`. |
| `legacy/fill` |
[Link](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28631/files#diff-2ef8dbfa5e69e2b96c3e1ed29ab962f08cf5ba2aaf2af773e40bd143e38a4bef)
| We're changing how small the main content can get, so the input is
only wrapping once it gets to `--inner-min-width`. |
| `slotted-inputs` |
[Link](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28631/files#diff-2f173c7303969d6a6c58f30a618cebc3caf918d3761fc83df5642fd48dfabd7b)
| We're changing how small the main content can get, so the range is
only wrapping once it gets to `--inner-min-width`. |
`slotted-inputs` note: I'd argue many of these examples are not best
practices. For example, adding a range in the start slot and the end
slot is a bit unusual. I'm not aware of any native apps that implement
this pattern.
popover note: I [removed the `ion-item` from the `popover/test/async`
test](331fcb859c).
There was a diff because the min-width increased, but IMO that component
should not be used in the popover test since we want to test the
popover, not the item.
--------
Demo:
| `feature-7.6` | `branch` |
| - | - |
| <video
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/2721089/693d4947-fa33-460d-bc7f-7b96b6338032"></video>
| <video
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/2721089/df35ca73-87aa-4e76-9bb7-99f0f2810640"></video>
|
(In this demo I updated the `ion-select` to wrap within its own
container first instead of truncate. We may want to consider doing this
by default, but I think this is out of scope for this task)
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandy@ionic.io>
Issue number: resolves#20053
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
There are a few methods that that are missing for the menu in the
Angular packages. This leads to users to not being able to use methods
like `isAnimating()`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The missing methods have been added by implementing `MenuControllerI`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: 7.5.8-dev.11701461830.1be851fd
Issue number: resolves#18071
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When adding elements to the DOM in the `ionInfinite` callback, scrolling
again would sometimes not cause `ionInfinite` to trigger again. We [set
the didFire flag to
`true`](388d19e04f/core/src/components/infinite-scroll/infinite-scroll.tsx (L126))
before calling `ionInfinite`. This flag ensures that `ionInfinite` is
not called multiple times if users continue to scroll after
`ionInfinite` is fired but before the `complete` method is called.
The [didFire flag is
reset](388d19e04f/core/src/components/infinite-scroll/infinite-scroll.tsx (L131))
once the user scrolls outside of the threshold. Normally this is fine:
If an application adds several new items to a list the current scroll
position will be outside of the threshold. However, if the scroll
position remains in the threshold (such as if an application append a
small number of new items to a list) then the `didFire` flag will not
get reset.
Additionally, there are some instances where the scroll position
restoration when `position="top"` may not work which can cause this bug
to trigger as well. For example, if users quickly scroll to the top, the
scroll position will not be restored correctly and the scroll position
will still be at the top of the screen. That is another instance where
this bug can trigger even if a large number of items were added to the
DOM.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The `didFire` flag is reset when the `complete` method is called. This
ensures that even if the scroll position is still in the threshold
`ionInfinite` can fire again.
Note that developers may notice `ionInfinite` firing more times as a
result of this change. This can happen when appending a small number of
items to the DOM such that the scroll position remains in the threshold.
Previously `ionInfinite` would not fire again, but now it does since
users are scrolling in the threshold. I decided to target this change
for a minor release to minimize any surprises for developers.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.4-dev.11700602203.1e7155a1`
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The labeler action is currently failing:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/actions/runs/7090913880/job/19298918578?pr=28622.
This is happening due to a breaking change in v5 of the action.
We currently pull from `main` for this action so we are now receiving v5
of the action:
fe3c3d500a/.github/workflows/label.yml (L16)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- This PR updates the action explicitly to v5 so we don't unexpectedly
take on breaking changes
- This PR also updates the labeler yaml file to account for the v5
breaking changes
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Related to #18132
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The documentation about the `autofocus` prop is unclear and does not
accurately reflect how it actually works across browsers and devices.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The documentation for `autofocus` and `setFocus` are more detailed.
- The documentation links to the relevant page in the docs.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
