Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
While debugging #28186, Maria and I identified that Ionic's lifecycle
event listeners (`ionViewWillEnter`, etc.) were being registered
multiple times on the same `.ion-page` element. This resulted in
problematic behavior, where a user's implementation of our lifecycle
hooks, would execute their callback multiple times.
```ts
useIonViewWillEnter(() => {
// This is called 2x for every time the `ionViewWillEnter` event is emitted (in React 18, dev mode)
console.log('hello world');
});
```
When the Ionic lifecycle event listeners are registered in React, we
bind the scope of the class to the callback function. When removing the
event listener we additional use the `.bind` syntax.
```tsx
componentDidMount() {
element.addEventListener('ionViewWillEnter', this.ionViewWillEnter.bind(this));
}
componentWillUnmount() {
// This creates a new instance of the function to remove! It doesn't remove the original event listener.
element.removeEventListener('ionViewWillEnter', this.ionViewWillEnter.bind(this));
}
```
The `.bind` method returns a new instance of the function. This means in
the implementation we are creating a new instance of the function when
both adding and removing the event listener - resulting in the
`removeEventListener` to never remove the original event listener.
This behavior only occurred in React 18 in dev mode, as a result of the
mount/unmount behavior running 2x for `useEffect` hooks.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ionic lifecycle event listeners are removed from element references
when they are unmounted.
- User's lifecycle callback methods are only invoked once per event
emission.
|Before|After|
|----|----|
|<img alt="CleanShot 2023-10-09 at 18 32 08@2x"
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/13732623/53f2ef5d-5900-4a84-b427-fa6c9d35d081">|<img
alt="CleanShot 2023-10-09 at 18 29 37@2x"
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/13732623/c8a9a657-a0bf-4d6d-9f21-a41a686de490">|
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <maria@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
"Owning" a test didn't really work out like I expected/hoped. A lot of
changes to the test files were minor, so I ended up just getting
assigned to more-or-less random PRs. It wasn't really hurting anything,
but I might as well just let the bot assign me.
---------
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
Issue number: resolves#24638, resolves#18592
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Developers have requested that Ionic Framework support the dynamic type
feature on iOS for accessibility purposes. Ionic applications do not
respond to font scaling on iOS which can create inaccessible
applications particularly for users with low vision. Ionic apps on
Android devices currently support the Android equivalent due to
functionality in the Chromium webview.
Developers have also requested a way of adjusting the fonts in their
Ionic UI components consistently.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ionic components now use `rem` instead of `px` where appropriate. This
means devs can change the font size on `html` and the text in supported
Ionic components will scale up/down appropriately
- Add support for Dynamic Type on iOS (the iOS version of Dynamic Font
Scaling)
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Shawn Taylor <shawn@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#28284
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Select focuses the first popover option when no value is provided. This
means that the first option is focused even if it disabled.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Select focuses the first **enabled** popover option when no value is
provided.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
**1. Bundle Size Reductions**
All Ionic UI components and Ionicons are added to the final bundle of an
Ionic Angular application. This is because all components and icons are
lazily loaded as needed. This prevents the compiler from properly tree
shaking applications. This does not cause all components and icons to be
loaded on application start, but it does increase the size of the final
app output that all users need to download.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionicons/issues/910https://github.com/ionic-team/ionicons/issues/536https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27280https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24352
**2. Standalone Component Support**
Standalone Components are a stable API as of Angular 15. The Ionic
starter apps on the CLI have NgModule and Standalone options, but all of
the Ionic components are still lazily/dynamically loaded using
`IonicModule`. Standalone components in Ionic also enable support for
new Angular features such as bundling with ESBuild instead of Webpack.
ESBuild does not work in Ionic Angular right now because components
cannot be statically analyzed since they are dynamically imported.
We added preliminary support for standalone components in Ionic v6.3.0.
This enabled developers to use their own custom standalone components
when routing with `ion-router-outlet`. However, we did not ship
standalone components for Ionic's UI components.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/25404https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27251https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27387
**3. Faster Component Load Times**
Since Ionic Angular components are lazily loaded, they also need to be
hydrated. However, this hydration does not happen immediately which
prevents components from being usable for multiple frames.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24352https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/26474
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ionic components and directives are accessible as Angular standalone
components/directives
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Associated documentation branch:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/tree/feature-7.5
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <maria@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#18974
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When multiple menus on the same `side` are registered, all but the most
recent menu are disabled. For example, if a user starts on PageA with a
`start` menu and then navigates to PageB which also has a `start` menu,
then the menu on PageA will be disabled. The problem is that if users
navigates back to PageA they will be unable to open the menu on that
view because it is still disabled. This behavior impacts any Ionic
developer trying to open a menu whether by calling the `open` method on
the menu itself or on the `menuController`.
After discussing with the team, we believe the original intent of this
behavior was to prevent users from accidentally opening the wrong menu
when calling `menuController.open('start')`. This API allows developers
to reference a menu by side, and since it's possible to have multiple
menus on the same side it's also possible to open the wrong menu when
referencing by side only.
However, this API starts to break down pretty quickly in a navigation
scenario.
Sample Repo: https://github.com/liamdebeasi/multiple-menu-bug-repro
## Scenario 1: Referencing Menu by Side
1. On the "home" route click "Open 'start' menu". Observe that the home
page menu opens.
2. Close the menu and click "Go to Page Two".
3. On the "page-two" route click "Open 'start' menu". Observe that the
page two menu opens.
4. Go back to "home".
5. Click "Open 'start' menu". Observe that nothing happens.
6. Click "Enable and Open 'start'" Menu". Observe that the home menu
opens.
## Scenario 2: Referencing Menu by ID
1. On the "home" route click "Open '#menu1' menu". Observe that the home
page menu opens.
2. Close the menu and click "Go to Page Two".
3. On the "page-two" route click "Open '#menu2' menu". Observe that the
page two menu opens.
4. Go back to "home".
5. Click "Open '#menu1' menu". Observe that nothing happens.
6. Click "Enable and Open '#menu1'" Menu". Observe that the home menu
opens.
## Scenario 3: Using 3 or more menus even when enabling menus
1. On the "home" route click "Open 'start' menu". Observe that the home
page menu opens.
2. Close the menu and click "Go to Page Two".
3. On the "page-two" route click "Open 'start' menu". Observe that the
page two menu opens.
4. Close the menu and click "Go to Page Three"
5. On the "page-three" route click "Open 'start' menu". Observe that the
page three menu opens.
6. Go back to "page-two".
8. Click "Open 'start' menu". Observe that nothing happens.
9. Click "Enable and Open 'start' Menu". Observe that nothing happens.
The menu controller attempts to find an enabled menu on the specified
side:
a04a11be35/core/src/utils/menu-controller/index.ts (L79C12-L79C12)
Step 6 is where this breaks down. In this scenario, the menus on "home"
and "page-two" are disabled. This leads menu controller to use its
fallback which tries to get the first menu registered on the specified
side:
a04a11be35/core/src/utils/menu-controller/index.ts (L86)
This means that the menu controller would attempt to open the "home"
menu even though the user is on "page-two" (because the start menu on
"home" was the first to be registered).
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Menus are no longer automatically disabled when a new menu on the same
side is registered
- Referencing menus by side when multiple menus with that side exist in
the DOM will cause a warning to be logged
This change has a couple implications:
1. Developers no longer need to manually enable a menu as noted in
https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/menu#multiple-menus. Note that
continuing to manually enable the menus will not cause any adverse side
effects and will effectively be a no-op.
2. Developers using the menuController to open a menu based on "side"
may end up having the wrong menu get opened.
Example before to this change:
1. Start on PageA with a `start` menu. Calling
`menuController.open('start')` opens the menu on PageA.
2. Go to PageB with a `start` menu. Calling
`menuController.open('start')` opens the menu on PageB because the menu
on PageA is disabled.
Example after to this change:
1. Start on PageA with a `start` menu. Calling
`menuController.open('start')` opens the menu on PageA.
2. Go to PageB with a `start` menu. Calling
`menuController.open('start')` attempts to opens the menu on PageA
because both menus are enabled. However, since PageA is hidden nothing
will appear to happen.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
I manually verified that removing the Angular Universal code does not
regress the behavior fixed in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/27814. The menu is
never automatically disabled, so the bug does not happen.
This is a partial fix for
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/18683. Properly
fixing this requires another change which is out of scope for this work.
Issue number: resolves#28293
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Disabled toggles, radios, and checkboxes can still be enabled by
manually dispatching a click event on them.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Toggles, radios, and checkboxes no longer activate if `disabled` is
set to `true`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.4.4-dev.11696545130.1171e7a9`
Issue number: resolves#20092, resolves#19676, resolves#19000
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Menu is currently throwing errors because it expects no animations to be
running when any state changes happen (such as changing `disabled` or
`swipeGesture`).
For example, if you set `swipeGesture="false"` mid-gesture then the menu
will error. Alternatively, if you set `disabled="true"` mid-open
animation then the menu will error also. This is undesirable because it
can cause visual flickering and other undesirable behaviors as noted in
the linked threads.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Any in-progress animation is cancelled if the state updates such that
the animation is no longer relevant (i.e. `disabled` is set to `true`
while the menu is opening)
- Removed relevant assertions
- Added tests
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.4.3-dev.11696264821.1755dd6a`
Issue number: resolves#27911
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `openURL` utility is not available to developers.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Export `openURL` utilities from `@ionic/core`, `@ionic/angular`,
`@ionic/react` and `@ionic/vue`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When trying to fix
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/20092, I discovered
that
ac2c8e6c22/core/src/components/menu/menu.tsx (L483)
was never resolving when the animation was aborted in
ac2c8e6c22/core/src/components/menu/menu.tsx (L699).
This can happen if `menu.disabled` is set to `true` mid-animation.
In order to fix the menu bug, I need this promise to resolve when the
animation is stopped.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The `play` method now correctly resolves when the animation is
cancelled.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
The `play` method resolves when a particular run of the animation is
finished. The `stop` method ensures that this run never finishes which
is why I've chosen to have `play` resolve. Note that `onFinish`
callbacks should not be fired because the animation run did not
complete.
Issue number: resolves#28303
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
- Swipe back gesture is inconsistently clobbered by ion-item-sliding's
gesture.
## What is the new behavior?
- Swipe back gesture now has a higher priority than ion-item-sliding
-
-
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
This patch has been in use in
[Voyager](https://github.com/aeharding/voyager) for the past couple
months to great success!
---------
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
when the stencil team wants to test a dev build of stencil against the
framework team's ci, they push a branch to this repo that overrides the
stencil nightly job's npm tag (replacing 'nightly' with the dev build
version) and manually kick off the nightly workflow. this commit would
eliminate the need for that first step there
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
update the stencil nightly job to accept any npm release tag, rather
than always default to 'nightly'. doing so allows the stencil team to
reuse this workflow for cases where we'd like to test a _dev_ build of
stencil by running it through the framework's ci process, without
landing the feature in stencil first.
I was able to test that `nightly` gets set by default (and the field is
required) by running the workflow from this branch.
I then also tested this against a dev build of Stencil:
Interestingly enough, it helped me catch something to consider if we
were to accept the PR this dev build is accepted!
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
I considered making a separate workflow for this (rather than
override/use nightly) - it didn't quite seem worth the maintenance
effort 🤷
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#27060
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The main header is controlled by the header with `collapse="condense"`
set:
a04a11be35/core/src/components/header/header.tsx (L144)
The collapse header will hide the main header and then show it once the
user has scrolled enough. However, if the main header is rendered before
the collapse header is rendered, then the main header will be visible
for a brief moment before being hidden by the collapse header. This
gives the perception of flicker that is reported on the linked issue.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The main header will be hidden on load if it loads before the collapse
header
The selector was written in a way such that once the collapse header
loads, this CSS no longer applies (since the collapse header will add
`.header-collapse-main` to the main header)
| `main` | branch |
| - | - |
| <video
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/2721089/3cb11a57-e084-435a-89c2-e1c2afba04b1"></video>
| <video
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/2721089/c5caeb5e-3b33-4598-986f-bf097c46251c"></video>
|
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Note: `:has` browser compat is still fairly new. However, it is
available on both Chromium and WebKit browsers (and has been for at
least a year): https://caniuse.com/?search=%3Ahas
Given that this bug is a fairly minor UI glitch (as opposed to something
that would cause an app to crash or otherwise malfunction), I think this
is an acceptable tradeoff. As time goes on this will become less of a
concern as more users update their devices.
Dev build: `7.4.3-dev.11696365694.156f41d3`
Bumps [@capacitor/core](https://github.com/ionic-team/capacitor) from
5.4.1 to 5.4.2.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/releases"><code>@capacitor/core</code>'s
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>5.4.2</h2>
<h2><a
href="https://github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/compare/5.4.1...5.4.2">5.4.2</a>
(2023-10-04)</h2>
<h3>Bug Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>android:</strong> make local urls use unpatched fetch (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/issues/6954">#6954</a>)
(<a
href="56fb8536af">56fb853</a>)</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Changelog</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/blob/5.4.2/CHANGELOG.md"><code>@capacitor/core</code>'s
changelog</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2><a
href="https://github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/compare/5.4.1...5.4.2">5.4.2</a>
(2023-10-04)</h2>
<h3>Bug Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>android:</strong> make local urls use unpatched fetch (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/issues/6954">#6954</a>)
(<a
href="56fb8536af">56fb853</a>)</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="5b437986db"><code>5b43798</code></a>
Release 5.4.2</li>
<li><a
href="56fb8536af"><code>56fb853</code></a>
fix(android): make local urls use unpatched fetch (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/issues/6954">#6954</a>)</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/compare/5.4.1...5.4.2">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#17676
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The IonNav, IonRouterOutlet, and .ion-page elements have `overflow:
hidden` which prevent content from spilling out of it. This was likely
done to prevent these elements from having overflow scroll (since the
inner IonContent should be scrollable). However, this breaks the
translucency effect on IonTabBar because the content in IonContent can
not scroll under the IonTabBar.
```html
<ion-tabs>
<ion-router-outlet> <!-- this has overflow: hidden -->
...
<ion-content fullscreen="true">...</ion-content>
</ion-router-outlet>
<ion-tab-bar translucent="true">...</ion-tab-bar>
</ion-tabs>
```
In Ionic v3 components such as IonTabs and IonNav did have `overflow:
hidden`:
cf35d5eb7f/src/components/app/app.scss (L241-L246)
However, components like IonNav were not used inside of tabs at the
time, so the reported bug was not a problem then.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed `overflow: hidden` from IonNav, IonRouterOutlet, and
.ion-page. This change seems safe to make because the `position:
absolute` and top/right/bottom/left values should ensure that these
elements take up the available screen space and avoid having overflow
scrolling.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.4.2-dev.11695832397.13fa6703`
Note: Fixing this reveals
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/21130 which is why
this fix is dependent on the linked issue getting fixed first.
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: resolves#17499
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Currently, there isn't a way to position toasts such that they don't
overlap navigation elements such as headers, footers, and FABs.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
Added the new `positionAnchor` property, which specifies an element that
the toast's position should be anchored to.
While the name can be tweaked, we should take care to keep the relation
between it and the `position` property clear. The `position` acts as a
sort of "origin" point, and the toast is moved from there to sit near
the chosen anchor element. This is important because it helps clarify
why the toast sits above the anchor for `position="bottom"` and vice
versa.
I chose not to rename the `position` prop itself to avoid breaking
changes.
Docs PR: https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/pull/3158
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#21130
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
IonContent sets `--offset-top` and `--offset-bottom` variables to allow
the content to scroll under headers, footers, and tab bars. This is
essential to creating the translucency effect on these components.
IonContent does this by computing its offsetHeight and offsetTop
coordinates which take into account the dimensions of headers, footers,
and tab bars. Occasionally, this code will run before the IonTabBar has
been hydrated which means that the offset will be wrong because the
IonTabBar will have a dimension of 0x0 prior to hydration.
This impacts Ionic Angular devs who are using the lazy loaded build of
Ionic. React and Vue devs are not impacted because they are using the
dist-custom-elements build of Ionic which does not have hydration.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- IonContent will re-run the offset computation code whenever the
`ionTabBarLoaded` event is emitted. This event is emitted at most once
per IonTabBar instance.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.4.2-dev.11695831341.191bdf12`
Note: I did not write a test since this is fixing a race condition. I
wasn't able to find a non-flaky way of testing this. You can test this
in an Ionic Angular Tabs starter application with the dev build. The
`--offset-bottom` variable on `ion-content` should be large enough such
that the content will scroll under the tab bar. The translucency effect
won't work just yet, but that is being fixed in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28246.
Issue number: resolves#28096
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When a segment button is clicked, the segment will auto-scroll to
position the newly active button fully in view. However, this behavior
does not occur on first load. This means that when a segment is
initialized with a `value` corresponding to an off-screen button, the
button will remain off-screen.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
The same auto-scroll behavior from button click now also occurs on
component load.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Code is duplicated between the router outlet and the overlays
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Code is reused between the router outlet and the overlays
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Resolves#25444
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In the custom elements build, currently used by React and Vue packages,
the range knob can be rendered incorrectly if the value is assigned
after the `connectedCallback` but before the initial render of the
component. This is most apparent with the dual knobs implementation in
React (referenced issue).
This results in the range's value being correct, but the visual
representation of the range to be incorrect.
This also causes issues with the custom elements build in the standalone
implementation of Ionic's components in Angular. If a range is presented
in a modal via a controller, the range will never render with the value
that is initially assigned to it.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates the range knob positioning when the range has initially
rendered.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
This change needs to be pulled into the Ionic angular standalone work.
Dev-build: `7.4.3-dev.11695926109.13b1266a`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Team members often need to update the ground truth screenshots when
validating visual regressions or working on a design change. The command
may be unfamiliar to them or they may be new to the project/playwright.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds a new script to the `core` package for updating the local (to the
file system) ground truth screenshots.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `getSnapshotSettings` method was used in the pre-generator test
infrastructure. It was deprecated at the start of the generator
migration.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Now that the generator migration is complete, this method is no longer
needed. As a result, I removed it. Developers should use the
`screenshot` function:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/core/src/utils/test/playwright/docs/api.md#using-the-return-value-from-each-configuration
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#23750
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Datetime does not support h11 and h24 hour formats
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Datetime supports h11 and h24 formats
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Implementation Notes:
1. I broke up the `is24Hour` function into two functions:
- The first function, `is24Hour`, accepts an hour cycle and returns true
if the hourCycle preference uses a 24 hour format
- The second function, getHourCycle, accepts a locale and an optional
hour cycle and returns the computed hour cycle. I found that the hour
cycle is not always set via `hourCycle` (such as when we are using the
system default if it's specified in the `locale` prop using locale
extension tags). This was coupled to is24Hour, but I needed this
functionality elsewhere to add support for this feature, so I decided to
break the functions up.
2. We were using the hour cycle types in several places, so I decided to
create a shared `DatetimeHourCycle` to avoid accidental typos.
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
During planning the team discussed that some of our internal docs are
outdated. Additionally, some of this info would be useful for
contributors.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ported remaining E2E docs to GitHub
- Added info on installing deps, running tests, and updating
screenshots. API and best practices are already on the repo.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#22564
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Changing the size of the FAB button causes it to be positioned
incorrectly. This was happening because we set position values based on
the assumption that the default FAB button would always be 56px x 56px.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- FAB and FAB List positioning is now computed based on intrinsic size
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.4.1-dev.11695395641.14897417`
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When testing Dynamic Font Scaling with a custom font I noticed that the
large title does not respect `--ion-font-family` on transition.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The cloned large title now respect `--ion-font-family`
Note: This happens in `main` too which is why I am merging into there
instead of the Dynamic Font Scaling branch.
| `main` | branch |
| - | - |
|
|
|
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
