Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Improves the developer message when generating a test app to include
the next steps to running the test app.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
CSS is not copied from the `core/` package when running each respective
framework package in watch mode.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Copies the global styles from the `core/` package to each respective
framework package when running the build in watch mode.
Note: This does not register a file watcher to copy CSS updates after
the initial command is ran. This just avoids a scenario of the global
styles being updated and the developer _not_ running a `pnpm build`
prior to running `pnpm build.watch` and the global styles not being
reflected in the framework package.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
This script was used to aid in the test of local version of
`@ionic/angular`. However, these instructions have been replaced by the
instructions in `packages/angular/test/README.md`. This PR removes the
old script.
Issue number: resolves#28827
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
This import was renamed to `IonBackButton` as part of
9f20780d66.
However, we did not consider that some developers are importing this to
use with `ViewChild`. While we should keep alignment with other
component imports, we need to support the old import until we can make a
breaking change in Ionic 8.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds the old IonBackButtonDelegate import
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.5-dev.11705352188.1c6cdb08`
Issue number: resolves#28716
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
All components that have per-mode stylesheets can have their mode
adjusted by setting `mode` on the component. We use the `setMode`
function to determine which mode to use on the component:
516b84475e/core/src/global/ionic-global.ts (L75)
While this works on refresher, it is missing the `virtualProp` jsdoc
comment which causes it to not have the appropriate type information. As
a result, when developers try to use a JS binding for `mode`, they will
get compilation errors.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds virtualProp for mode to refresher
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
I am considering this a bug fix instead of a feature. In non-TypeScript
environments you can set `mode` on `ion-refresher` and it does change
the mode. What's missing here is the type information associated with
it.
Dev build: `7.6.2-dev.11702914017.1ae72da5`
Issue number: resolves#20053
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
There are a few methods that that are missing for the menu in the
Angular packages. This leads to users to not being able to use methods
like `isAnimating()`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The missing methods have been added by implementing `MenuControllerI`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: 7.5.8-dev.11701461830.1be851fd
Issue number: resolves#28385
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Overlay controllers do not register their respective overlays
components. This results in the overlay not appearing.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Each standalone overlay controller manually calls
`defineCustomElement` for their respective overlay component to ensure
the component is loaded/registered.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.6-dev.11700492285.1581ed02`
Issue number: Resolves#28514
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When using the `@ionic/angular` schematic in an Angular 17 project (`ng
add @ionic/angular`), developers will receive an error preventing the
schematic from running.
Additionally, the previous implementations of the schematic are out of
sync with the current state of the Ionic starters:
- `variables.css` is empty and missing Ionic's defaults
- `ionic.config.json` is not created
- Schematic does not have support for module vs. standalone projects.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `ng add @ionic/angular` works with Angular 17 projects
- `ng add @ionic/angular` has fallback behavior for Angular 16 projects
using `AppModule`
- Schematics now includes the proper `variables.css` from Ionic starters
- Ionicons assets will no longer be copied when being added to a
standalone project
- Refactors a majority of the implementation to use the utilities that
come directly from `@angular-devkit/schematics` and
`@schematics/angular`.
- Sets the `@ionic/angular-toolkit` CLI configuration and schematics
configuration in the `angular.json`
- Creates missing `ionic.config.json`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `7.5.5-dev.11700239837.1925bbdb`
To test this PR:
1. Install Angular CLI v17 - `npm install -g @angular/cli@17`
2. Create a new project - `ng new angular-17`
3. Use the dev-build: - `ng add
@ionic/angular@7.5.5-dev.11700239837.1925bbdb`
4. Confirm the prompts
5. Validate that `provideIonicAngular({})` is added to the
`app.config.ts`
6. Validate that `ionic.config.json` was created
7. Validate that `angular.json` was updated with the
`@ionic/angular-devkit` configurations
Now verify legacy behavior:
1. Install Angular CLI v16 - `npm install -g @angular/cli@16`
2. Create a new project - `ng new angular-16`
3. Use the dev-build - `ng add
@ionic/angular@7.5.5-dev.11700239837.1925bbdb`
4. Confirm the prompts
5. Validate that `IonicModule.forRoot({})` is added to the
`app.module.ts`
8. Validate the ionicons glob pattern is added to the `angular.json`
9. Validate the `ionic.config.json` was created
10. Validate the `angular.json` was updated with the
`@ionic/angular-devkit` configurations
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common loading provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common alert provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common picker provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
