mirror of
https://github.com/espressif/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-06-20 01:50:24 +08:00

Macro arguments may be separated by commas or just whitespace. Macro arguments may also be quoted (where one level of quotes is removed in the course of determining the values for the respective formal parameters). Furthermore this quote removal knows _two_ somewhat odd escaping mechanisms: One, apparently in existence forever, is that a pair of quotes counts as the escaping of a quote, with the pair being transformed to a single quote in the course of quote removal. The other (introduced by c06ae4f232e6) looks more usual on the surface in that it deals with \" sequences, but it _retains_ the escaping \. Hence only the former mechanism is suitable when the value to be used by the macro body is to contain a quote. Yet this results in ambiguity of what "a""b" is intended to mean; elsewhere (e.g. for .ascii) it represents two successive string literals. However, in any event is the above different from "a" "b": I don't think this can be viewed the same as "a""b" when processing macro arguments. Change the scrubber to retain such whitespace, by making the processing of strings more similar to that of symbols. And indeed this appears to make sense when taking into account that for quite a while gas has been supporting quoted symbol names. Taking a more general view, however, the change doesn't go quite far enough. There are further cases where significant whitespace is removed by the scrubber. The new testcase enumerates a few in its ".if 0" section. I'm afraid the only way that I see to deal with this would be to significantly simplify the scrubber, such that it wouldn't do much more than collapse sequences of unquoted whitespace into a single blank. To be honest problems in this area aren't really surprising when seeing that there's hardly any checking of .macro use throughout the testsuite (and in particular in the [relatively] generic tests under all/).
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
README for GNU development tools This directory contains various GNU compilers, assemblers, linkers, debuggers, etc., plus their support routines, definitions, and documentation. If you are receiving this as part of a GDB release, see the file gdb/README. If with a binutils release, see binutils/README; if with a libg++ release, see libg++/README, etc. That'll give you info about this package -- supported targets, how to use it, how to report bugs, etc. It is now possible to automatically configure and build a variety of tools with one command. To build all of the tools contained herein, run the ``configure'' script here, e.g.: ./configure make To install them (by default in /usr/local/bin, /usr/local/lib, etc), then do: make install (If the configure script can't determine your type of computer, give it the name as an argument, for instance ``./configure sun4''. You can use the script ``config.sub'' to test whether a name is recognized; if it is, config.sub translates it to a triplet specifying CPU, vendor, and OS.) If you have more than one compiler on your system, it is often best to explicitly set CC in the environment before running configure, and to also set CC when running make. For example (assuming sh/bash/ksh): CC=gcc ./configure make A similar example using csh: setenv CC gcc ./configure make Much of the code and documentation enclosed is copyright by the Free Software Foundation, Inc. See the file COPYING or COPYING.LIB in the various directories, for a description of the GNU General Public License terms under which you can copy the files. REPORTING BUGS: Again, see gdb/README, binutils/README, etc., for info on where and how to report problems.
Description
Languages
C
51.8%
Makefile
22.4%
Assembly
12.3%
C++
6%
Roff
1.4%
Other
5.4%