mirror of
				https://github.com/fastapi-users/fastapi-users.git
				synced 2025-10-31 09:28:45 +08:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			84 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			84 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
| # Authentication
 | |
| 
 | |
| **FastAPI Users** allows you to plug in several authentication methods.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## How it works?
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can have **several** authentication methods, e.g. a cookie authentication for browser-based queries and a JWT token authentication for pure API queries.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When checking authentication, each method is run one after the other. The first method yielding a user wins. If no method yields a user, an `HTTPException` is raised.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For each backend, you'll be able to add a router with the corresponding `/login` and `/logout`. More on this in the [routers documentation](../routers/index.md).
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Transport + Strategy = Authentication backend
 | |
| 
 | |
| An authentication backend is composed of two parts:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Transport
 | |
| 
 | |
| It manages how the token will be carried over the request. We currently provide two methods:
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### [Bearer](transports/bearer.md)
 | |
| 
 | |
| The token will be send through an `Authorization: Bearer` header.
 | |
| 
 | |
| !!! tip "Pros and cons"
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * ✅ Easy to read and set in every requests.
 | |
|     * ❌ Needs to be stored manually somewhere in the client.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ➡️ Use it if you want to implement a mobile application or a pure REST API.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### [Cookie](transports/cookie.md)
 | |
| 
 | |
| The token will be send through a cookie.
 | |
| 
 | |
| !!! tip "Pros and cons"
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * ✅ Automatically stored and sent securely by web browsers in every requests.
 | |
|     * ✅ Automatically removed at expiration by web browsers.
 | |
|     * ❌ Needs a CSRF protection for maximum security.
 | |
|     * ❌ Harder to work with outside a browser, like a mobile app or a server.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ➡️ Use it if you want to implement a web frontend.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Strategy
 | |
| 
 | |
| It manages how the token is generated and secured. We currently provide two methods:
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### [JWT](strategies/jwt.md)
 | |
| 
 | |
| The token is self-contained in a JSON Web Token.
 | |
| 
 | |
| !!! tip "Pros and cons"
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * ✅ Self-contained: it doesn't need to be stored in a database.
 | |
|     * ❌ Can't be invalidated on the server-side: it's valid until it expires.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ➡️ Use it if you want to get up-and-running quickly.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### [Database](strategies/database.md)
 | |
| 
 | |
| The token is stored in a table (or collection) in your database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| !!! tip "Pros and cons"
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * ✅ Secure and performant.
 | |
|     * ✅ Tokens can be invalidated server-side by removing them from the database.
 | |
|     * ✅ Highly customizable: add your own fields, create an API to retrieve the active sessions of your users, etc.
 | |
|     * ❌ Configuration is a bit more complex.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ➡️ Use it if you want maximum flexibility in your token management.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### [Redis](strategies/redis.md)
 | |
| 
 | |
| The token is stored in a Redis key-store.
 | |
| 
 | |
| !!! tip "Pros and cons"
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * ✅ Secure and performant.
 | |
|     * ✅ Tokens can be invalidated server-side by removing them from Redis.
 | |
|     * ❌ A Redis server is needed.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ➡️ Use it if you want maximum performance while being able to invalidate tokens.
 | 
