If we select "unconfined" as AppArmor profile, then we should not error
even if the host does not support it at all. This behavior has been
fixed and a corresponding e2e test has been added as well.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@suse.com>
In podman 1.0 if you executed a command like:
podman run --user dwalsh --cap-add net_bind_service alpine nc -l 80
It would work, and the user dwalsh would get the capability, in
podman 2.0, only root and the binding set gets the capability.
This change restores us back to the way podman 1.0 worked.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
To sync the behavior between AppArmor and seccomp it is now possible to
also specify seccomp profiles for privileged containers.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@suse.com>
Currently you can not apply an ApparmorProfile if you specify
--privileged. This patch will allow both to be specified
simultaniosly.
By default Apparmor should be disabled if the user
specifies --privileged, but if the user specifies --security apparmor:PROFILE,
with --privileged, we should do both.
Added e2e run_apparmor_test.go
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
With the advent of Podman 2.0.0 we crossed the magical barrier of go
modules. While we were able to continue importing all packages inside
of the project, the project could not be vendored anymore from the
outside.
Move the go module to new major version and change all imports to
`github.com/containers/libpod/v2`. The renaming of the imports
was done via `gomove` [1].
[1] https://github.com/KSubedi/gomove
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
If user sets capabilities list we need handle minimal capabilities.
Also handle seccomp-policy being passed in.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
