Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `AnimationController` does not use the correct underlying instance
of the utilities from either the lazy or custom elements build,
depending on if the developer is using `@ionic/angular` or
`@ionic/angular/standalone`. It will always use the lazy instance.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `AnimationController` uses the instance of the utilities based on it's
implementation type, e.g. `@ionic/angular/standalone` uses the custom
elements build with the utilities from `@ionic/core/components`.
- `@ionic/angular` and `@ionic/angular/standalone` now export their own
specific implementation of `AnimationController`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
Ionic was re-exporting the `AnimationController` from both
`@ionic/angular` and `@ionic/angular/standalone` entry points.
Developers will not need to update their implementations or change
import paths to take advantage of this change.
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: #
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Ionic Framework uses Jest 27. Previously, this was due to a limitation
of Stencil. As of Stencil v4.7.0, this limitation no longer exists & the
Framework can upgrade to the latest version of Jest.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
There was a top level dependency on `@jest/core` that I could not find
to be used anywhere. This dependency is included in `jest` by default,
and has been removed as a top level/`package.json` dependency.
Otherwise, all jest packages have been upgraded to jest v29. This is two
major version bumps and a switch to the jest-circus runtime (instead of
jest-jasmine2).
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
There is some inherent risk of _something_ breaking when someone like me
who doesn't work on this project day-to-day bumps packages. I did this
as a part of testing Jest 29 when implementing its support in Stencil
and thought "Well, why not?". Feel free to reject this PR if you feel
it's not worth the risk/effort at the moment.
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
- Removed the common toast provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Other information
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
This is part of my work for hack day, but I wanted to tackle the
following problems:
1. There is no easy way to have angular, angular-server, vue,
vue-router, react, and react-router automatically recompile when you
make a change. Right now you have to manually run `npm run build` every
time you make a change.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds `npm run build.watch` to let developers easily watch for changes
in each project.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common modal provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
We already have test coverage for the modalController, so I did not add
new ones
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#28466
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27060 I fixed an
issue where the main title would be visible briefly before the
collapsible large title a) was configured and b) hid the main title. I
accomplished this by using CSS to target
`ion-header[collapse="condense"]`. However, I failed to account for when
the property is not reflected on the host. Some JS frameworks allow the
property to remain on the element but some do not.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- I improved this fix by also targeting the class set on the host. This
class is set regardless of property reflection status.
| main | branch |
| - | - |
| <video
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/2721089/991523da-8549-451b-930f-5df45c2783de"></video>
| <video
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/2721089/149c9546-2d9b-42a2-89f1-a17fa146aee6"></video>
|
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.4-dev.11699282935.1db450b0`
---------
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in src and
standalone. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common popover provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
I didn't add tests because there's already existing ones for popover
controller.
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common action sheet provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#28468
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The cancel button in the searchbar used to align with the back button,
but that behavior gradually regressed between Ionic v4 and Ionic v7.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adjusted the padding on the searchbar back button
- Reduced the size of the searchbar back button. It was currently set to
25.6px whereas the `ion-back-button` icon was 24px. This caused the
icons to never align even with 9px. (This should cause a few additional
diffs)
- Added a screenshot test
| v4 | v5 | v6 | v7 | branch |
| - | - | - | - | - |
| 
|
|
|
|
|
Note that in v4 the alignment was slightly off. It was fixed in v5, but
then broke in v6 and remained unchanged in v7 (until now).
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.4-dev.11699310489.151b2717`
---------
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The safe area for Item Divider would change sides when the direction
changed. e.g., if the safe area padding should be on the left, it would
be on the left when the direction was LTR but would be on the right when
the direction was RTL. It should always be on the left.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The left safe area padding is on the left side of an Item Divider
whether the direction is LTR or RTL.
- The right safe area padding is on the right side of an Item Divider
whether the direction is LTR or RTL.
- Updated LTR and RTL screenshots for item to include an item divider
Similar to #28403 but for Item Divider.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Bumps [@stencil/core](https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil) from 4.7.0
to 4.7.1.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/releases"><code>@stencil/core</code>'s
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>🍿 v4.7.1 (2023-11-06)</h2>
<h3>Bug Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>compiler:</strong> correctly generate CSS rules using
<code>::slotted</code> outside shadow DOM (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/ionic-team/stencil/issues/4969">#4969</a>)
(<a
href="4fd0ecd17e">4fd0ecd</a>)</li>
<li><strong>compiler:</strong> ignore TS diagnostics on builds where
typedef file changes (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/ionic-team/stencil/issues/5013">#5013</a>)
(<a
href="2a75b6501f">2a75b65</a>)</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Changelog</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md"><code>@stencil/core</code>'s
changelog</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>🍿 <a
href="https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/compare/v4.7.0...v4.7.1">4.7.1</a>
(2023-11-06)</h2>
<h3>Bug Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>compiler:</strong> correctly generate CSS rules using
<code>::slotted</code> outside shadow DOM (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/ionic-team/stencil/issues/4969">#4969</a>)
(<a
href="4fd0ecd17e">4fd0ecd</a>)</li>
<li><strong>compiler:</strong> ignore TS diagnostics on builds where
typedef file changes (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/ionic-team/stencil/issues/5013">#5013</a>)
(<a
href="2a75b6501f">2a75b65</a>)</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="ac812d74bc"><code>ac812d7</code></a>
v4.7.1 (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/ionic-team/stencil/issues/5025">#5025</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="b6387a36d2"><code>b6387a3</code></a>
chore(deps): update dependency terser to v5.24.0 (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/ionic-team/stencil/issues/5024">#5024</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="2a75b6501f"><code>2a75b65</code></a>
fix(compiler): ignore TS diagnostics on builds where typedef file
changes (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/ionic-team/stencil/issues/5">#5</a>...</li>
<li><a
href="9062e1a967"><code>9062e1a</code></a>
refactor(sys): move logger impl to <code>sys/node/logger</code> (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/ionic-team/stencil/issues/5009">#5009</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="4fd0ecd17e"><code>4fd0ecd</code></a>
fix(compiler): correctly generate CSS rules using <code>::slotted</code>
outside shadow ...</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/compare/v4.7.0...v4.7.1">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When using an `ion-label` as a `label` slot inside of an `ion-input`,
`ion-textarea` or `ion-select` it erroneously flags the input as a
legacy component and ignores the `label-placement`:
<table>
<tr>
<td>
Code
</td>
<td>
Result
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<pre lang="html">
<ion-item>
<ion-input label-placement="floating">
<ion-label slot="label">
<ion-icon name="home"></ion-icon>
Slotted Label
</ion-label>
</ion-input>
</ion-item>
<ion-item>
<ion-input label-placement="floating" value="Value">
<ion-label slot="label">
<ion-icon name="person"></ion-icon>
Slotted Label
</ion-label>
</ion-input>
</ion-item>
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<img
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/6577830/91ef5470-aba4-4bb6-b277-09e2b1a4650c">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<img width="1005" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-07 at 10 37 43 AM"
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/6577830/00208625-2bdb-4b60-b7ce-e487dd89c47e">
## What is the new behavior?
Adds `ion-input`, `ion-textarea`, and `ion-select` as components that
can contain a named label slot so it no longer assumes that they are
legacy components.
<table>
<tr>
<td>
Code
</td>
<td>
Result
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<pre lang="html">
<ion-item>
<ion-input label-placement="floating">
<ion-label slot="label">
<ion-icon name="home"></ion-icon>
Slotted Label
</ion-label>
</ion-input>
</ion-item>
<ion-item>
<ion-input label-placement="floating" value="Value">
<ion-label slot="label">
<ion-icon name="person"></ion-icon>
Slotted Label
</ion-label>
</ion-input>
</ion-item>
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<img
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/6577830/75f06c5e-6887-4e8e-8022-264b716b3e62">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The vue, vue-router, react, and react-router packages are bundled with a
version of rollup that are 2 major versions out of date.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Update deps to rollup 4 and made any necessary changes as a result of
breaking changes
- Removed the react projects old treeshaking script. The rollup dep used
was incompatible with Rollup 4, and the script didn't work to begin
with.
- Removed the source maps and resolve plugins. These did not make any
difference in the final result, and source maps are still included in
the final build.
- Removed a PURE annotation from an import. Rollup 4 warns about this,
and this PURE annotation does not seem to be needed since every import
in this file uses "createReactComponent" to begin with.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Rollup has a plugin to handle TypeScript compilation that we are not
using. As a result, we are maintaining unnecessary infrastructure such
as compiling to `dist-transpiled`(TS to JS) and then compiling the
results to `dist` (JS files to bundled code).
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Vue, Vue Router, React, and React Router now make use of the Rollup
Typescript plugin to handle TypeScript compilation for us. This lets us
remove the `dist-transpiled` directory altogether and the manual `tsc`
invocation.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Developers should not see any changes in how they consume Ionic. This
just hands the TypeScript compilation step off to the Rollup plugin.
Dev build: `7.5.3-dev.11698859252.15ac163e`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The "prerelease" script hasn't been used since we switched off our
custom release scripts.
The "test.spec.debug" script doesn't do anything special now because the
`--node-arg` argument has been removed:
```
liamdebeasi@MacBook-Pro core % npx --node-arg=\"--inspect-brk\" stencil test --spec
npx: the --node-arg argument has been removed.
See `npm help exec` for more information
```
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the "prerelease" and "test.spec.debug" scripts from "core"
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#28435
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The item in the last item-sliding still has a border in an inset list.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Item in last item-sliding no longer has a border
I originally only added `ion-item-sliding:last-of-type ion-item` but I
discovered that the original `ion-item:last-child` causes items in
item-sliding where the item is the last element in the item-sliding
container to not have a border, so the original fix was incomplete.
I added comments as to what each line does and why we didn't just do
`ion-item:last-child`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
--------
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Sometimes the screenshot gets captured as
when it should be
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Hopefully the screenshot will be more consistent.
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The safe area for Item would change sides when the direction changed.
e.g., if the safe area padding should be on the left, it would be on the
left when the direction was LTR but would be on the right when the
direction was RTL. It should always be on the left.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The left safe area padding is on the left side of Item whether the
direction is LTR or RTL.
- The right safe area padding is on the right side of Item whether the
direction is LTR or RTL.
- There's now a screenshot test for left and right padding for both
directions.
Note: There is a separate ticket for updating the safe area padding for
ion-item-divider.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
These scripts are old and do not do anything (`np` isn't even a
dependency).
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the scripts from react and react-router
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Resolves#23942
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When an overlay is created (inserted in the DOM), but not presented, the
scroll gesture is prevented. This behavior comes from the
`connectedCallback` of `ion-backdrop`, where the gesture is prevented as
soon as the backdrop is inserted in the DOM.
This means in situations where a developer creates an overlay, but does
not present it immediately, the user cannot scroll. This is not desired.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Scroll blocking behavior tied to the gesture has been removed from
`ion-backdrop` and implemented into the overlays directly.
- When an overlay is presented, scroll blocking is enabled on the `body`
element (the user cannot scroll on the main content).
- When the last presented overlay is dismissed, scroll blocking is
disabled on the `body` element (the user can scroll on the main
content).
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
`ion-backdrop` no longer prevents scrolling on the main content when the
backdrop is either inserted into the DOM or removed from the DOM.
Developers using Ionic overlays do not need to migrate their
implementations.
Developers with custom overlays using `ion-backdrop` internally can
either use Ionic's gesture controller to disable scrolling when their
overlay is presented/dismissed or can manually add the
`backdrop-no-scroll` Ionic global class to the `body` element.
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Issue number: #28121
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
It is not possible to navigate between months when ion-datetime is in
readonly mode. This means that if there are multiple dates selected, the
user cannot browse to view them all.
Also, keyboard navigation is not prevented in `readonly` or `disabled`
mode where it should be.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
When `readonly`:
- Clicking the month-year button changes the month & year in readonly
mode
- Clicking the next & prev buttons changes the month in readonly mode
- Left and right arrow keys change the month in readonly mode
- Swiping/scrolling changes the month in readonly mode
- The selected date does not change when doing any of the above
- You cannot clear the value using keyboard navigation of the clear
button in readonly mode
When `disabled`:
- You cannot navigate months via keyboard navigation of the month-year
button in disabled mode
- You cannot navigate months using keyboard navigation of the previous &
next buttons in disabled mode
- You cannot navigate months via the left and right arrow keys in
disabled mode
- The selected date does not change when doing any of the above
- You cannot clear the value using keyboard navigation of the clear
button in disabled mode
Known bug:
- It is still possible to navigate through dates in `prefers-wheel` when
`disabled`. This bug existed prior to this PR. I created FW-5408 to
track this.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#28431
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
My previous attempt at fixing
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28358 caused inputs
to no longer be correctly proxied to the underlying components. This was
an attempt to work around an underlying ng-packagr bug (see linked
thread for more info).
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
I decided it would be best to continue using `ProxyCmp` (since we know
that works) and find an alternative to working around the ng-packagr
bug. I spoke with the Angular team, and they recommended pulling the
provider into its own object. `forwardRef` is now required since we are
referencing the component before it is declared.
- Revert
82d6309ef1
- Moves provider to an object to avoid ng-packagr issue
- I reverted the proxy e2e tests. These are no longer needed since we
are not ejecting from the typical `ProxyCmp` usage anymore.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.3-dev.11698699090.1151d73f`
Verified that the issue is fixed with the repro provided in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28431
Also verified that this does not regress the issue described in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28358.
Issue number: Resolves#28256
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In the form integrations for Angular and Vue, the value of a range does
not update while the knob is actively being dragged, only when the knob
is released.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
The form integrations now update the range's value when the `ionInput`
event fires, rather than `ionChange`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
I wasn't sure how to add reliable automated tests for this behavior. The
difference only applies when actively dragging the knob, and we've had
issues with such gestures being flaky in the past. I did add value
displays to the test apps so the behavior can be manually tested.
Issue number: resolves#28418
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Due to
https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil-ds-output-targets/issues/397,
calling `proxyInputs` for the form controls caused an error to be logged
in developer applications.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updated to a version of the Angular output targets with a patch for
this error
- I also excluded the `utils.ts` from all `angular-component-lib`
directories from prettier since it was causing a diff. These changes are
autogenerated so we should not be linting them anyways.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.3-dev.11698340692.18daff2f`
Issue number: resolves#28417
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The common `IonRouterOutlet` was trying to inject another common
`IonRouterOutlet` into `parentOutlet`:
dc94ae01fe/packages/angular/common/src/directives/navigation/router-outlet.ts (L119)
None existed, so this field was `null`.
This is a problem if developers are using the module `IonRouterOutlet`
since parent router outlets will not be currently injected because
Angular is trying to use the common `IonRouterOutlet` not the module
`IonRouterOutlet`:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/packages/angular/src/directives/navigation/ion-router-outlet.ts.
The same goes for the standalone `IonRouterOutlet`.
This resulted in things such as `NavController.pop` not working in
nested outlets because the parentOutlet was not defined.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `IonRouterOutlet` now injects the correct router outlet instance for
`parentOutlet`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.3-dev.11698328998.1a79f815`
Issue number: #
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
i found a small typo in the contributing guide
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
update the relative path for updating ionic angular, now that it's code
lives under the `packages/` directory
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Bumps [@capacitor/core](https://github.com/ionic-team/capacitor) from
5.5.0 to 5.5.1.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/releases"><code>@capacitor/core</code>'s
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>5.5.1</h2>
<h2><a
href="https://github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/compare/5.5.0...5.5.1">5.5.1</a>
(2023-10-25)</h2>
<h3>Bug Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>ios:</strong> CAPWebView config update (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/issues/7004">#7004</a>)
(<a
href="f3e8be0453">f3e8be0</a>)</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Changelog</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/blob/5.5.1/CHANGELOG.md"><code>@capacitor/core</code>'s
changelog</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2><a
href="https://github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/compare/5.5.0...5.5.1">5.5.1</a>
(2023-10-25)</h2>
<h3>Bug Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>ios:</strong> CAPWebView config update (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/issues/7004">#7004</a>)
(<a
href="f3e8be0453">f3e8be0</a>)</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="a0f61ed020"><code>a0f61ed</code></a>
Release 5.5.1</li>
<li><a
href="f3e8be0453"><code>f3e8be0</code></a>
fix(ios): CAPWebView config update (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/issues/7004">#7004</a>)</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/ionic-team/capacitor/compare/5.5.0...5.5.1">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
aIssue number: resolves#28388
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
We added a `min-height: 56px` to the input, textarea, and select
components for MD mode. However, these were added for the outline/solid
style inputs to align with the Material Design spec:
https://material-components.github.io/material-components-web-catalog/#/component/text-field
They should not apply to regular inputs in an item. The end result is
inconsistently sized items when used with non-control items.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Non-filled and non-stacked/floating label controls are now have a
minimum height of 44px.
There should be **no changes** to the following types of controls:
1. iOS controls (all variants)
2. MD filled controls
3. MD stacked controls
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.2-dev.11697818830.1a33c881`
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
I forgot to add annotations to tests to indicate the bug fix they are
validating: https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28408
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Added annotations
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#28373
---------
🚨 Reviewers: Please test this on Chrome, Firefox, and Safari
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The fix in
1167a9325f
uncovered a WebKit bug where scrolling an element using `scrollIntoView`
during an accelerated transition causes the segment to jump during the
transition. `scrollIntoView` can cause parent elements to also scroll,
and given that the entering view begins outside the viewport, it's
possible this triggered some sort of WebKit bug where it was trying to
scroll the element into view.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updated the internal implementation to use `scrollBy` instead of
`scrollIntoView`. `scrollBy` does not attempt to scroll parent elements
which avoids the WebKit issue.
- I also updated the initial scroll to be instant rather than smoothly
scroll. If a segment is added to the DOM, I'd expect it to be added with
the correct scroll position (after the first render that is), so
animating on load seemed like a strange behavior. User interaction will
continue to use smooth scrolling though.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.2-dev.11697638908.1f04980a`
Issue number: #19539
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When an app uses Capacitor, then the platform subscriptions will run
outside of the Angular Zone.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The platform subscriptions will run inside of the Angular Zone
regardless if it uses Capacitor or not.
Added an extra `zone.run` within the event listener.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `npm install @ionic/angular@7.5.2-dev.11698187124.1b7ea660`
Issue number: resolves#28406
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
As part of https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/27898 we
updated the radio and checkbox labels to wrap to the next line instead
of truncate. However, we did not consider long words. As a result, long
words run outside of the container.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The radio and checkbox labels now break on words too in addition to
white space characters.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
The safe area padding (both left and right) swap sides when the app's
direction changes from LTR to RTL. The `--ion-safe-area-left` should
always apply to the left side of the device and the
`--ion-safe-area-right` should always apply to the right side of the
device.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates the tab bar stylesheet to always set `padding-left` and
`padding-right`
- Adds an e2e test for the basic directory which adds screenshots in
both modes/directions for:
- the default tab bar
- a tab bar with safe area left applied
- a tab bar with safe area right applied
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
