Issue number: internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
The `ion-button` component is used in several tests to navigate or show
overlays. This causes screenshot diffs in unrelated tests any time the
UI of the `ion-button` is updated.
## What is the new behavior?
Removes the `ion-button` elements from unrelated tests.
Did not remove the `ion-button`s from the following tests:
- All `ion-button`s in an `ion-buttons` component
- An `ion-button` inside of a menu
- breadcrumbs/test/basic (uses a clear button in a list header, needs to
be moved)
- input/test/slot
- item/test/buttons
- item/test/colors
- item/test/dividers
- item/test/inputs
- item/test/media
- list-header/test/basic
- ripple-effect/test/basic
- router/test/basic
- router/test/guards
- router-outlet/test/basic
- select/test/slot
- textarea/test/slot
Updates the icon/basic test to use the right icon names by comparing
against the v3 names: https://ionicframework.com/docs/v3/ionicons/
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Framework has a structure when it comes to PR titles. However, there
aren't any reinforcements to it unless a reviewer checks it.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Added a GitHub action that will validate the PR title. It checks that
there is a valid type, checks that it has a scope, and that the subject
doesn't start with a uppercase character.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Create a branch from this one to test it out.
Issue number: resolves#29414
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In Angular when the segment buttons are dynamically rendered, the
segment will not set the active visual state for the selected segment
after the re-render.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- In Angular the segment will set the active item visually when the
items are dynamically changed
Previously this PR:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28837 aimed to
resolve https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28816. I
have confirmed that the modified approach in the dev-build fixes#29414
and #28816 and the previous change is no longer needed.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `8.0.2-dev.11714411675.10f48160`
Issue number: resolves#23650
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In traditional native applications, navigation will inform screen
readers that the view has changed. This allows screen readers to focus
the correct view. In a single page app on the web, this same concept
does not exist. As a result, transitioning from Page A to Page B results
in screen reader focus remaining on Page A. This means that users who
rely on screen readers are not informed of view changes.
Currently, developers are responsible for implementing this on their
own.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Introduces a new focus manager priority global config. When defined,
the app developer can specify which area of the view focus should be
moved to when the transition ends. The developer does this by specifying
areas in order of priority which allows for fallbacks in the event that
a particular UI component (such as a header) does not exist on a view.
There is some risk here by managing focus for the application. As a
result, this feature is considered experimental and disabled by default.
The team should collect feedback based on usage and enable it by default
when they feel this feature is stable enough.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
⚠️ Due to the `tsconfig.json` change, reviewers should restart the
Stencil dev server when checking out these changes locally.
Reviewers: Please test both of the test template files on physical iOS
and Android device with VoiceOver and TalkBack enabled, respectively.
Docs Link: https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/pull/3627
This PR makes the following changes:
1. Clarifies when `.ion-focusable` should be used versus
`:focus-visible`.
2. Clarifies that `Locator` needs to be typecast when using
`Locator.spyOnEvent`.
Issue number: resolves#28751
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The large title transition does not account for back buttons with no
text value. We assume that the [`.button-text` element
](bfaf528e61/core/src/components/back-button/back-button.tsx (L168))
is always defined, but that is not the case when `text=""` on the back
button. As a result, devs were getting errors because we tried to get
the bounding box of a undefined.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Revised the large title logic to only grab values from the back button
text if the back button text element is actually defined
There should be **no behavior change** when the back button text element
is defined.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev Build: `7.8.5-dev.11713282122.18cabf98`
⚠️ Reviewers: Please test this in the sample application on the linked
issue. Please be sure to test the following conditions:
1. When the back button text is defined
2. When the back button text is not defined
3. With the default font scale
4. With a larger font scale
Issue number: resolves#29198
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/27917 I failed to
account for RTL. This caused the navigation with the arrow buttons to
break because the scroll position was always < 2.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Datetime now checks if the component is in RTL mode when creating the
scrollLeft threshold.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#29393
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
With Stencil v4.17.1, in Angular apps Stencil's `MockDoc` will be
bundled with the consumer's code resulting in a significant increase to
the main chunk.
|v8.0.0|
|---|
||
|v8.0.1|
|---|
||
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates to v4.17.2 of Stencil, which resolves this regression 🎉
|Dev-build|
|---|
||
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `8.0.2-dev.11714402065.169342dc`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The current border implementation causes layout shift.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Matches MD highlight effect for the focus border
- Border implementation does not cause layout shift
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#29321
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When using a select with `fill="outline"`, `interface="popover"` and a
width that fits the content of the options, the select options are not
visible. The hidden radio is covering the text of the radio text
options.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Select options are visible and no longer covered by the hidden radio
container
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `8.0.2-dev.11714165638.13e7dd5b`
Reproduction (issue): https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-mndtkr
Reproduction (with dev-build):
https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-mndtkr-d7wsnp
Reproduction steps:
1. Open the select
2. Observe: The popover displays the options, but the options are not
visible/readable to the user
3. Use the dev-build
4. Open the select
5. Observe: The popover displays the options and they are
visible/readable to the user (5, 10, 15).
Issue number: resolves#29386
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The item border does not have sufficient contrast in dark mode making
the border almost invisible.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the `--ion-border-color` in the MD dark palette. Instead,
we're using the [theme
default](dc1172a841/core/src/themes/ionic.theme.default.md.scss (L31)).
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
The earliest reference to the offending line Brandy and I could find was
[here](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/18713#issuecomment-510644371).
Issue number: resolves
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/issues/3588
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The documentation around `ionChange` not being emitted when
programmatically changing the property associated to the "value" is
either inconsistent or missing from certain components.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds the documentation to the missing components.
- Makes the documentation consistent across components.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
## What is the current behavior?
Currently, every Sass variable in Ionic has the `!default` flag added to
the end.
From the [Sass variables
documentation](https://sass-lang.com/documentation/variables/):
> Normally when you assign a value to a variable, if that variable
already had a value, its old value is overwritten. But if you’re writing
a Sass library, you might want to allow your users to configure your
library’s variables before you use them to generate CSS.
>
> To make this possible, Sass provides the `!default` flag. This assigns
a value to a variable only if that variable isn’t defined or its value
is [null](https://sass-lang.com/documentation/values/null). Otherwise,
the existing value will be used.
In past versions of Ionic Framework, developers wrote Sass variables to
rebuild Ionic Framework using their own values. In the latest versions
of Ionic Framework, this is not possible.
## What is the new behavior?
Removes the `!default` flag from all Sass variables.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
-------
Co-authored-by: brandyscarney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR removes the v5 and v4 lts tags from the release scripts. The
main branch should always be used to deploy to the latest/next tags and
never in the past. Instead, the version branches have the option to
deploy to their respective LTS tags.
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Syncs the `next` branch with the latest from `main`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates to the latest version of Stencil
- Includes a fix for the api.txt diff issue we are experiencing off
`next`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#29358
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When the clear button is focused, `focusin` is dispatched and bubbles up
to the `ion-input`. Our [scroll assist utility listens for
`focusin`](2fc81ddc9b/core/src/utils/input-shims/hacks/scroll-assist.ts (L135))
to adjust the scroll position. It also causes the input to be
re-focused. As a result, when swiping to the clear button with a screen
reader, focus will be forcibly moved back to the input. This means that
users cannot swipe away from the input to the right when using a screen
reader.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- To fix this, I decided to have the `focusin` event from the clear
button not bubble (as opposed to add a really specific workaround to the
scroll assist utility).
Adding `stopPropagation` was easy enough, but it turned out that the
scroll assist listeners were all configured to listen during the capture
phase instead of the bubble phase. As a result, `stopPropgation` had no
effect because the scroll assist callback had already fired. To address
this, I updated the listeners to listen during the bubbling phase
instead of the capture phase. Based on my testing the capture phase was
not required for scroll assist to work, so it appears safe to remove.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `8.0.1-dev.11713535425.1a4afba3`
Reviewers: Please test this on a physical iOS device and be sure to test
the scroll assist behavior. There is a test at
http://localhost:3333/src/utils/input-shims/hacks/test you can use.
