Issue number: internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
There are a few tests that were disabled due to being flaky from
gestures.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
While fixing the tests, I found a bug that the scroll was never being
disabled on scroll. Additionally, we were not taking into account that a
custom scroll target could be used so it was never disabled either.
- Fixed the flaky tests.
- Content doesn't scroll when range is being dragged.
- Content can be either `ion-content` or a custom scroll target.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
[Preview for
`ion-content`](https://ionic-framework-git-fw-2873-ionic1.vercel.app/src/components/range/test/scroll)
[Preview for custom scroll
target](https://ionic-framework-git-fw-2873-ionic1.vercel.app/src/components/range/test/scroll-target)
How to test:
1. Open either of the previews
2. Render the screen with the device simulator from the browser
3. Verify that you can scroll the page
4. Drag the range but don't let go
5. Verify that you cannot scroll the page
6. Repeat steps 2-5 with the other preview
Issue number: resolves#29792
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When the user drags the range knob (most easily reproduced in fullscreen
mode) and the gesture emits a current x position of `0`, the range
incorrectly emits a value of `NaN`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `ion-range` does not emit `NaN` and instead emits the correct range
value for the knob
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
Several screenshot images were not removed when their e2e test was.
## What is the new behavior?
I ran the following command in `ionic-framework/core` to find all
`*.png` files that did not have a parent `*.e2e.ts` file:
```bash
find ./src/components -iname '*.png' -exec bash -c 'cd "${1%/*}";
shopt -s nullglob; files=(../*.e2e.ts);
((${#files[@]} == 0)) && echo "$1"' _ {} \;
```
I have deleted all of these images.
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandy@ionic.io>
Issue number: resolves
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/issues/3588
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The documentation around `ionChange` not being emitted when
programmatically changing the property associated to the "value" is
either inconsistent or missing from certain components.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds the documentation to the missing components.
- Makes the documentation consistent across components.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
## What is the current behavior?
Currently, every Sass variable in Ionic has the `!default` flag added to
the end.
From the [Sass variables
documentation](https://sass-lang.com/documentation/variables/):
> Normally when you assign a value to a variable, if that variable
already had a value, its old value is overwritten. But if you’re writing
a Sass library, you might want to allow your users to configure your
library’s variables before you use them to generate CSS.
>
> To make this possible, Sass provides the `!default` flag. This assigns
a value to a variable only if that variable isn’t defined or its value
is [null](https://sass-lang.com/documentation/values/null). Otherwise,
the existing value will be used.
In past versions of Ionic Framework, developers wrote Sass variables to
rebuild Ionic Framework using their own values. In the latest versions
of Ionic Framework, this is not possible.
## What is the new behavior?
Removes the `!default` flag from all Sass variables.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
-------
Co-authored-by: brandyscarney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrates the test infrastructure to use `palettes` instead of `themes`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
This **does not** change where the light/dark/high contrast styles live
or how they are consumed in the test infra. That work is done here:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/29149
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#28487
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
There are two behaviors that need to be addressed.
1. The range value is updated when the gesture `onStart` event is fired.
This can lead to the values being accidentally updated when the user is
scrolling on the view.
The user might tap on the range to scroll on the view, but the range
value is updated instead.
2. The component prevents the view from scrolling while the user has
touched any part of the range.
The user might want to scroll and they happen to touch the range. This
can lead to the user feeling disoriented because they can't scroll on
the view anymore.
These behaviors do not follow the native behavior of mobile devices.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The range value is updated on touch end or when the knob is being
dragged.
- The view can be scrolled while the user is not dragging the knob.
- A new variable `isScrollingView` is used to determine if the user is
scrolling on the view regardless of whether the user is dragging the
knob or not. This determines what logic to apply.
- The `pressedKnob` variable is no longer being set in the `onStart`
event. It is now being set in the `onMove` and `onEnd` events. (the
reason behind this can be found within the newly added comments)
- The `initialContentScrollY` variable is no longer being set in the
`onStart` event. It is now being set in the `onMove` event. (the reason
behind this can be found within the newly added comments)
I did not change the behavior of the range when the user is dragging the
knob. The view should not scroll while the user is dragging the knob.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
The new behavior aligns with the native mobile devices.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved placing an `ion-range` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have been removed from range. For more information on migrating from the legacy range syntax, refer to the [Range documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/range#migrating-from-legacy-range-syntax).
⚠️ This is a combination of previously approved PRs with the
exception of
fe9dca513c.
This change was made as a result of
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework-design-documents/pull/248.
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Users do not have a way of increasing the contrast in Ionic apps. This
is valuable for people with low vision as increasing the contrast
between foreground and background content helps improve readability.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds a high contrast light and high contrast dark theme. As with our
other themes, developers can choose between system, class, and always
stylesheets.
While we aim to improve contrast for text and UI components, this
feature prioritizes text in the event that both text and UI component
cannot be improved without one negatively impacting the other.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.7-dev.11706894781.1cd59fde`
Testing instructions:
1. Open `src/themes/test/css-variables`. Activate the high contrast
light and dark themes to verify that contrast does increase.
2. Use the dev build to integrate the theme into a test app (conference
app, starter app, etc).
I'd recommend using these imports:
```css
@import "@ionic/angular/css/themes/high-contrast.system.css";
@import "@ionic/angular/css/themes/high-contrast-dark.system.css";
```
Note: Make sure this is imported **after** `core.scss`
---------
Co-authored-by: Shawn Taylor <shawn@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
The old `border-radius` mixin added additional selectors and styles
depending on whether the direction was set to `ltr` or `rtl`.
Old mixin usage:
```scss
.old-border-radius {
@include border-radius(5px, 6px, 7px, 8px)
}
```
generates:
```css
.old-border-radius {
border-top-left-radius: 5px;
border-top-right-radius: 6px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 7px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 8px;
}
:host-context([dir=rtl]) .old-border-radius {
border-top-left-radius: 6px;
border-top-right-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 8px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 7px;
}
[dir=rtl] .old-border-radius {
border-top-left-radius: 6px;
border-top-right-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 8px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 7px;
}
@supports selector(:dir(rtl)) {
.old-border-radius:dir(rtl) {
border-top-left-radius: 6px;
border-top-right-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 8px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 7px;
}
}
```
## What is the new behavior?
The new `border-radius` mixin uses the [logical
properties](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_logical_properties_and_values/Margins_borders_padding)
which handles switching based on the
[writing-mode](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/writing-mode),
[direction](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/direction),
and
[text-orientation](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/text-orientation):
| Before | After |
| -----------------------------| ----------------------------|
| `border-top-left-radius` | `border-start-start-radius` |
| `border-bottom-left-radius` | `border-end-start-radius` |
| `border-top-right-radius` | `border-start-end-radius` |
| `border-bottom-right-radius` | `border-end-end-radius` |
New mixin usage:
```scss
.new-border-radius {
@include border-radius(5px, 6px, 7px, 8px)
}
```
```css
.new-border-radius {
border-start-start-radius: 5px;
border-start-end-radius: 6px;
border-end-end-radius: 7px;
border-end-start-radius: 8px;
}
```
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Other information
The `select` styles have been updated to use the mixin instead of
hardcoding `border-radius`.
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Several tests were still using the legacy form syntax.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrated tests in `core`, `angular`, and `vue` to use the modern form
syntax (`react` did not have form controls).
I opted not to migrate `item/test/highlight` and `item/test/counter`
because those tests are going to be removed in the future once the
deprecate item APIs are removed.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The team would like to ensure that Ionic Framework components that use
an Ionic color (primary, secondary, etc) on top of a contrast color pass
minimum contrast ratios as defined in the WCAG.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Introduces a revised set of Ionic colors that pass AA color contrast
guidelines when with the appropriate contrast.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandy@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Shawn Taylor <shawn@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28694 there was
some confusion around how to access `this` inside of a callback function
passed to a property on Ionic components. The root issue was due to how
the `this` context is determined with developers being responsible for
setting the appropriate `this` context.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- While this isn't an Ionic bug, I think it's worth calling out this
behavior so developers are aware of how to account for it.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Note: The link in the docs will not work until
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/pull/3333 is merged.
---------
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Type checking inside of the Stencil unit tests have been disabled for a
long time. This has resulted in a difficult developer experience and
numerous issues (both types and implementation) within our unit tests.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Type checking is now enabled for all Stencil unit tests
- Tests have been updated to resolve type errors and implementation
errors
- Many `as any` casts were introduced, as many legacy tests test invalid
configurations of functions that require it (for example passing
`undefined` to an argument that cannot be `undefined`).
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
To test this PR you can checkout the branch locally. Install
dependencies in the `/core` directory to make sure you are on at least
`@stencil/core@4.7.2`.
Opening either a `.spec.ts` or `.spec.tsx` file, validate that your IDE
detects types and can provide auto completions for jest global types.
If you desire, you can provide an invalid type and try building the
project - you will observe the build will fail due to the invalid type.
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
This project has several unused Sass variables still in the code base.
The team would like to remove these.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed unused Sass variables
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
The original scope of this ticket was for checkbox only, but many other
components had unused sass variables, so I decided to tackle everything
all at once.
Since these variables are not used anywhere:
1. The build should pass
2. There should be no screenshot diffs
1) Wraps the label text and other content in an item when there is not enough room for everything to fit, instead of truncating the label with an ellipsis. Does not apply to items containing legacy inputs.
2) Passes the legacy property up to item from checkbox, input, radio, range, select, textarea and toggle. Item adds classes for all of these and does not wrap its contents if that class exists. If a developer is using a legacy input without the legacy property on it then they will need to add the legacy property to prevent the wrapping.
3) If a developer does not want the text to wrap for labels in modern items, the `ion-text-nowrap` class can be added to the label.
Issue number: resolves#24638, resolves#18592
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Developers have requested that Ionic Framework support the dynamic type
feature on iOS for accessibility purposes. Ionic applications do not
respond to font scaling on iOS which can create inaccessible
applications particularly for users with low vision. Ionic apps on
Android devices currently support the Android equivalent due to
functionality in the Chromium webview.
Developers have also requested a way of adjusting the fonts in their
Ionic UI components consistently.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ionic components now use `rem` instead of `px` where appropriate. This
means devs can change the font size on `html` and the text in supported
Ionic components will scale up/down appropriately
- Add support for Dynamic Type on iOS (the iOS version of Dynamic Font
Scaling)
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Shawn Taylor <shawn@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Resolves#25444
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In the custom elements build, currently used by React and Vue packages,
the range knob can be rendered incorrectly if the value is assigned
after the `connectedCallback` but before the initial render of the
component. This is most apparent with the dual knobs implementation in
React (referenced issue).
This results in the range's value being correct, but the visual
representation of the range to be incorrect.
This also causes issues with the custom elements build in the standalone
implementation of Ionic's components in Angular. If a range is presented
in a modal via a controller, the range will never render with the value
that is initially assigned to it.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates the range knob positioning when the range has initially
rendered.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
This change needs to be pulled into the Ionic angular standalone work.
Dev-build: `7.4.3-dev.11695926109.13b1266a`
Issue number: resolves#27199
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When using the modern range in an item, the knob will get cut off by the
item when the value is at either the min or the max.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Range knob is no longer cut off by the item
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
This is an extension of
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/27188. I decided to
make a separate branch/PR since I added tests and changed the
implementation a bit. Feel free to take all/some/none of this code.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Several tests for this component are still using Playwright's old
`toMatchSnapshot` assertion. It's now recommended to use the newer
`toHaveScreenshot` assertion. This new assertion reduces the size of
each screenshot and brings anti-flake improvements such as disabling
animations by default.
We previously migrated most of our codebase to use `toHaveScreenshot`,
but it looks like we missed the tests that were written during the
development of Ionic 7 in a separate branch off `main`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrate component tests to use `toHaveScreenshot`.
Note: There should be no layout changes to any of the screenshots. The
only difference between the old and new screenshots should be image and
file size.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: multiple internals
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Multiple tests that use gestures are flaky on GitHub. Due to that those
tests are being skipped.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `page.mouse.move` will not work as expected if it the mouse moves
outside of the viewport. This may lead to events to not fire every time.
There's now a check to determine if the coordinates are valid. If they
are not, then it will update the coordinates to be as close to the
viewport's edge instead of being outside.
- Safari doesn't repaint the frame as often as the other browsers. This
causes the tests on GitHub to appear to be lagging. Now the frame is
forced to repaint only for Safari.
- Most tests are no longer being skipped.
- Range is still having issues on GitHub. It is no longer flaky locally
with the changes in this PR. I've had to revert them back to skip until
further notice.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
If this PR is merged, then:
- FW-3006, FW-2795, and FW-3079 can be closed
- FW-4556 still needs to remain open since range is still flaky on
GitHub
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `ion-header` and `ion-footer` use a base64 encoded image for a box
shadow instead of using the CSS box-shadow property directly. The use of
the background image creates CSP violations. The historic reasoning of
using an image instead of box shadow was to improve scroll performance.
Browsers and devices have improved a lot since that was implemented (5
years ago).
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates the usage of `ion-header` and `ion-footer` to use a box
shadow. The value comes from Material's web implementation:
https://material-components.github.io/material-components-web-catalog/#/component/top-app-bar
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: resolves#27184
---------
## What is the current behavior?
The modern form controls do not use the same opacity for their labels
when disabled, resulting in inconsistent UI when using two different
types in the same view (select vs checkbox, for example).
## What is the new behavior?
The checkbox, input, radio, range, select, textarea and toggle labels
have been updated on both modes to use the same opacity as each other
when disabled. The checkbox and radio icons have been updated to use a
different opacity than the label for `md` mode.
- Updates `ios` mode so all form controls use the same opacity of `0.3`
- I could not find any guidelines by Apple for what color these should
be, so I decided to just make them the same as what is most commonly
used & match item
- Updates `md` mode so all form control labels use the same opacity of
`0.38`
- I used the [Material Design 3
documentation](https://m2.material.io/components) to get this number as
well as the opacity of the disabled selection controls in the [Material
Design 2 figma design
kit](https://www.figma.com/community/file/778763161265841481). The
Material Design 2 documentation does not mention the opacity, but this
is also the number used by Material Design 1 so it's safe to assume it
is what the disabled form labels should also use for Material Design 2.
- Updates the `md` range so the slotted elements are also included when
setting the opacity on the label
- Updates the range, radio & checkbox tests to make sure there are
screenshots in the different disabled states
- Updates the item/disabled test to include radio & textarea so you can
see all form controls side by side
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Other information
I downloaded screenshots of the item disabled tests and put them side by
side for `main` and this branch in order to see the differences in the
labels. The grey boxes to the left of each item are just a bigger
version of the label color for that item, so it's easier to see when
they aren't the same.
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: resolves#27129
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Material Design has 16px of margin between the form control and the
label, but we have 8px:
https://m2.material.io/components/selection-controls#usage
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates default margin from 8px to 16px for checkbox, input, radio,
range, select, textarea, and toggle.
Note: This should only apply to labels that are on the same line as the
form control. In other words, they do not apply to stacked/floating
labels.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Labels on `ion-range` can only be set via the `label` slot. When only
plain text is needed, this is cumbersome because you need to add an
entire new element to wrap the label.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
Label prop added. If both the prop and slot are used, the prop will take
priority.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
- Docs PR: https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/pull/2955
- Dev build: `7.0.6-dev.11683657201.139d03f4`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The team has observed that Playwright's default screenshot diff
threshold of 0.2 is not sensitive enough, and screenshots that should be
getting updated are not getting updated.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates the threshold to 0.1
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: Resolves#21968
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When using fractional values for `min`, `max`, or `step`, it is possible
for floating point rounding errors to cause unexpected values to be
emitted. For example, `step="0.05" min="0.1" max="1"` emits a value of
`0.150000000004` after moving one step.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
Values are rounded to the max number of decimal places between the three
props. Note that it isn't mathematically possible to arrive at a value
with more decimal places than the props*, since addition (i.e. starting
at `min` and adding multiples of `step`) can't increase the precision of
a number.
\* Unless the `value` is set manually, but in that case, `ion-range`
currently snaps to a multiple of `step` as soon as the slider is moved,
resuming normal behavior.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Range tests are using legacy syntax
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Range tests are using generator syntax
849e127974
- The scroll target tests do not vary across modes so I removed those
additional checks.
0b8c15838a
- The standalone directory had some screenshots that were not in use, so
I deleted them
5b306f28b7
- The modern range event tests do not vary across modes/directions, so I
removed the additional checks.
699fb62789
- The legacy scroll target tests do not vary across modes so I removed
those additional checks.
c7dbb2d380
- The legacy range functional tests do not vary across modes/directions,
so I removed the additional checks.
aa06ba8ebf
- The legacy range event tests do not vary across modes/directions, so I
removed the additional checks.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#27305
---------
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Checkbox, radio, range, select, and toggle take up 100% of its width
even when in a start/end slot.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Checkbox, radio, range, select, and toggle do not take up 100% of its
width even when in a start/end slot.
. The "no slot" behavior is unchanged and aligns with the legacy select.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
