javascript/ionic-framework
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework.git synced 2026-03-13 10:22:08 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

chore: add workflow for commenting on community feedback labels (#27419)

Browse Source 
Issue number: N/A

---------

<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->

<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->

## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->

The team would like to provide more context surrounding the `community
feedback wanted` label in terms of setting expectations that we may
accept or reject the feedback after a community feedback period.

## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->

- Ionitron will now comment on `community feedback wanted` issues.

## Does this introduce a breaking change?

- [ ] Yes
- [x] No

<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->


## Other information

<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
This commit is contained in:
Liam DeBeasi
2023-05-08 16:16:20 -04:00
committed by GitHub
parent 12139e2cf4
commit 170bcd8124
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
.github/ionic-issue-bot.yml vendored
View File

@@ -34,6 +34,15 @@ comment:
For a guide on how to create a good reproduction, see our [Contributing Guide](https://ionicframework.com/docs/contributing/how-to-contribute#creating-a-good-code-reproduction).
- label: "community feedback wanted"
message: >
This issue has been labeled as `community feedback wanted`. This label is added to issues that we would like to hear from the community on before moving forward with any final decision on the feature request.
If the requested feature is something you would find useful for your applications, please react to the original post with 👍 (`+1`). If you would like to provide an additional use case for the feature, please post a comment.
The team will review this feedback and make a final decision. Any decision will be posted on this thread, but please note that we may ultimately decide not to pursue this feature.
Thank you!
dryRun: false
closeAndLock: