mirror of
https://github.com/espressif/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-06-25 21:41:47 +08:00

This commit addresses the issue in PR gdb/30087. If a breakpoint with multiple locations has a thread condition, then the 'info breakpoints' output is a little messed up, here's an example of the current output: (gdb) break foo thread 1 Breakpoint 2 at 0x401114: foo. (3 locations) (gdb) break bar thread 1 Breakpoint 3 at 0x40110a: file /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c, line 32. (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 2 breakpoint keep y <MULTIPLE> thread 1 stop only in thread 1 2.1 y 0x0000000000401114 in foo at /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25 2.2 y 0x0000000000401146 in foo at /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25 2.3 y 0x0000000000401168 in foo at /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25 3 breakpoint keep y 0x000000000040110a in bar at /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:32 thread 1 stop only in thread 1 Notice that, at the end of the location for breakpoint 3, the 'thread 1' condition is printed, but this is then repeated on the next line with 'stop only in thread 1'. In contrast, for breakpoint 2, the 'thread 1' appears randomly, in the "What" column, though slightly offset, non of the separate locations have the 'thread 1' information. Additionally for breakpoint 2 we also get a 'stop only in thread 1' line. There's two things going on here. First the randomly placed 'thread 1' for breakpoint 2 is due to a bug in print_one_breakpoint_location, where we check the variable part_of_multiple instead of header_of_multiple. If I fix this oversight, then the output is now: (gdb) break foo thread 1 Breakpoint 2 at 0x401114: foo. (3 locations) (gdb) break bar thread 1 Breakpoint 3 at 0x40110a: file /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c, line 32. (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 2 breakpoint keep y <MULTIPLE> stop only in thread 1 2.1 y 0x0000000000401114 in foo at /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25 thread 1 2.2 y 0x0000000000401146 in foo at /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25 thread 1 2.3 y 0x0000000000401168 in foo at /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25 thread 1 3 breakpoint keep y 0x000000000040110a in bar at /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:32 thread 1 stop only in thread 1 The 'thread 1' condition is now displayed at the end of each location, which makes the output the same for single location breakpoints and multi-location breakpoints. However, there's still some duplication here. Both breakpoints 2 and 3 include a 'stop only in thread 1' line, and it feels like the additional 'thread 1' is redundant. In fact, there's a comment to this very effect in the code: /* FIXME: This seems to be redundant and lost here; see the "stop only in" line a little further down. */ So, lets fix this FIXME. The new plan is to remove all the trailing 'thread 1' markers from the CLI output, we now get this: (gdb) break foo thread 1 Breakpoint 2 at 0x401114: foo. (3 locations) (gdb) break bar thread 1 Breakpoint 3 at 0x40110a: file /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c, line 32. (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 2 breakpoint keep y <MULTIPLE> stop only in thread 1 2.1 y 0x0000000000401114 in foo at /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25 2.2 y 0x0000000000401146 in foo at /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25 2.3 y 0x0000000000401168 in foo at /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25 3 breakpoint keep y 0x000000000040110a in bar at /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:32 stop only in thread 1 All of the above points are also true for the Ada 'task' breakpoint condition, and the changes I've made also update how the task information is printed, though in the case of the Ada task there was no 'stop only in task XXX' line printed, so I've added one of those. Obviously it can't be quite that easy. For MI backwards compatibility I've retained the existing code (but now only for MI like outputs), which ensures we should generate backwards compatible output. I've extended an Ada test to cover the new task related output, and updated all the tests I could find that checked for the old output. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30087 Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
README for GNU development tools This directory contains various GNU compilers, assemblers, linkers, debuggers, etc., plus their support routines, definitions, and documentation. If you are receiving this as part of a GDB release, see the file gdb/README. If with a binutils release, see binutils/README; if with a libg++ release, see libg++/README, etc. That'll give you info about this package -- supported targets, how to use it, how to report bugs, etc. It is now possible to automatically configure and build a variety of tools with one command. To build all of the tools contained herein, run the ``configure'' script here, e.g.: ./configure make To install them (by default in /usr/local/bin, /usr/local/lib, etc), then do: make install (If the configure script can't determine your type of computer, give it the name as an argument, for instance ``./configure sun4''. You can use the script ``config.sub'' to test whether a name is recognized; if it is, config.sub translates it to a triplet specifying CPU, vendor, and OS.) If you have more than one compiler on your system, it is often best to explicitly set CC in the environment before running configure, and to also set CC when running make. For example (assuming sh/bash/ksh): CC=gcc ./configure make A similar example using csh: setenv CC gcc ./configure make Much of the code and documentation enclosed is copyright by the Free Software Foundation, Inc. See the file COPYING or COPYING.LIB in the various directories, for a description of the GNU General Public License terms under which you can copy the files. REPORTING BUGS: Again, see gdb/README, binutils/README, etc., for info on where and how to report problems.
Description
Languages
C
51.8%
Makefile
22.4%
Assembly
12.3%
C++
6%
Roff
1.4%
Other
5.4%