mirror of
https://github.com/espressif/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-06-01 03:41:58 +08:00
2011-05-24 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
gdb/ * breakpoint.c (watchpoint_check): If the watchpoint went out of scope, clear its command list. (map_breakpoint_numbers): Don't walk the related breakpoints list of each breakpoint. gdb/testsuite/ * gdb.base/commands.exp (watchpoint_command_test): Check that the watchpoint's command list didn't execute when the watchpoint went out of scope.
This commit is contained in:
@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
|
||||
2011-05-24 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* breakpoint.c (watchpoint_check): If the watchpoint went out of
|
||||
scope, clear its command list.
|
||||
(map_breakpoint_numbers): Don't walk the related breakpoints list
|
||||
of each breakpoint.
|
||||
|
||||
2011-05-24 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* MAINTAINERS: Move Jim Blandy to past maintainers.
|
||||
|
@ -3866,6 +3866,8 @@ watchpoint_check (void *p)
|
||||
" deleted because the program has left the block in\n\
|
||||
which its expression is valid.\n");
|
||||
|
||||
/* Make sure the watchpoint's commands aren't executed. */
|
||||
decref_counted_command_line (&b->commands);
|
||||
watchpoint_del_at_next_stop (b);
|
||||
|
||||
return WP_DELETED;
|
||||
@ -11585,25 +11587,8 @@ map_breakpoint_numbers (char *args, void (*function) (struct breakpoint *,
|
||||
ALL_BREAKPOINTS_SAFE (b, tmp)
|
||||
if (b->number == num)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct breakpoint *related_breakpoint;
|
||||
|
||||
match = 1;
|
||||
related_breakpoint = b;
|
||||
do
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct breakpoint *next_related_b;
|
||||
|
||||
/* FUNCTION can be also delete_breakpoint. */
|
||||
next_related_b = related_breakpoint->related_breakpoint;
|
||||
function (related_breakpoint, data);
|
||||
|
||||
/* For delete_breakpoint of the last entry of the ring we
|
||||
were traversing we would never get back to B. */
|
||||
if (next_related_b == related_breakpoint)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
related_breakpoint = next_related_b;
|
||||
}
|
||||
while (related_breakpoint != b);
|
||||
function (b, data);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (match == 0)
|
||||
|
@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
|
||||
2011-05-24 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* gdb.base/commands.exp (watchpoint_command_test): Check that the
|
||||
watchpoint's command list didn't execute when the watchpoint went
|
||||
out of scope.
|
||||
|
||||
2011-05-24 Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
|
||||
|
||||
Centralize -DSYMBOL_PREFIX=\"_\" additional flags in gdb.exp.
|
||||
@ -30,7 +36,6 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Cope with async mode.
|
||||
|
||||
gdb/testsuite/
|
||||
* gdb.mi/mi-break.exp (test_breakpoint_commands): Split gdb_test
|
||||
into gdb_test + mi_expect_stop.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -294,6 +294,9 @@ proc watchpoint_command_test {} {
|
||||
pass "begin commands on watch"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
# See the 'No symbol "value...' fail below. This command will
|
||||
# fail if it's executed in the wrong frame. If adjusting the
|
||||
# test, make sure this property holds.
|
||||
gdb_test_multiple "print value" "add print command to watch" {
|
||||
-re ">$" {
|
||||
pass "add print command to watch"
|
||||
@ -308,9 +311,18 @@ proc watchpoint_command_test {} {
|
||||
"" \
|
||||
"end commands on watch"
|
||||
|
||||
gdb_test "continue" \
|
||||
"Continuing.*\[Ww\]atchpoint $wp_id deleted because the program has left the block in.*which its expression is valid.*run.c:(57|82).*" \
|
||||
"continue with watch"
|
||||
set test "continue with watch"
|
||||
gdb_test_multiple "continue" "$test" {
|
||||
-re "No symbol \"value\" in current context.\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
|
||||
# Happens if GDB actually runs the watchpoints commands,
|
||||
# even though the watchpoint was deleted for not being in
|
||||
# scope.
|
||||
fail $test
|
||||
}
|
||||
-re "Continuing.*\[Ww\]atchpoint $wp_id deleted because the program has left the block in.*which its expression is valid.*run.c:(57|82).*$gdb_prompt $" {
|
||||
pass $test
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
proc test_command_prompt_position {} {
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user