e2e test failures are rife with messages like:
Expected 1 to equal 0
These make me cry. They're anti-helpful, requiring the reader
to dive into the source code to figure out what those numbers
mean.
Solution: Go tests have a '.Should(Exit(NNN))' mechanism. I
don't know if it spits out a better diagnostic (I have no way
to run e2e tests on my laptop), but I have to fantasize that
it will, and given the state of our flakes I assume that at
least one test will fail and give me the opportunity to see
what the error message looks like.
THIS IS NOT REVIEWABLE CODE. There is no way for a human
to review it. Don't bother. Maybe look at a few random
ones for sanity. If you want to really review, here is
a reproducer of what I did:
cd test/e2e
! positive assertions. The second is the same as the first,
! with the addition of (unnecessary) parentheses because
! some invocations were written that way. The third is BeZero().
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Equal\((\d+)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(\(Equal\((\d+)\)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(BeZero\(\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit(0))/' *_test.go
! Same as above, but handles three non-numeric exit codes
! in run_exit_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Equal\((\S+)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
! negative assertions. Difference is the spelling of 'To(Not)',
! 'ToNot', and 'NotTo'. I assume those are all the same.
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Not\(Equal\((0)\)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.ToNot\(Equal\((0)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.NotTo\(Equal\((0)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
! negative, old use of BeZero()
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.ToNot\(BeZero\(\)\)/Expect($1).Should(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
Run those on a clean copy of main branch (at the same branch
point as my PR, of course), then diff against a checked-out
copy of my PR. There should be no differences. Then all you
have to review is that my replacements above are sane.
UPDATE: nope, that's not enough, you also need to add gomega/gexec
to the files that don't have it:
perl -pi -e '$_ .= "$1/gexec\"\n" if m!^(.*/onsi/gomega)"!' $(grep -L gomega/gexec $(git log -1 --stat | awk '$1 ~ /test\/e2e\// { print $1}'))
UPDATE 2: hand-edit run_volume_test.go
UPDATE 3: sigh, add WaitWithDefaultTimeout() to a couple of places
UPDATE 4: skip a test due to bug #10935 (race condition)
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
We missed bumping the go module, so let's do it now :)
* Automated go code with github.com/sirkon/go-imports-rename
* Manually via `vgrep podman/v2` the rest
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
- When one or more containers in the Pod reports an error on an operation
report StatusConflict and report the error(s)
- jsoniter type encoding used to marshal error as string using error.Error()
- Update test framework to allow setting any flag when creating pods
- Fix test_resize() result check
Fixes#8865
Signed-off-by: Jhon Honce <jhonce@redhat.com>
With additional stores there is a risk that you could have
multiple images with the same name. IE An older image in a
read/only store versus a newer version in the read/write store.
This patch will ignore multiple images with the same name iff
one is read/write and all of the others are read/only.
Fixes: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/8176
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
in an effort to speed up the remote testing, we should be using
lookaside storage to avoid pull images as well as importing multiple
images into the RW store.
one test was removed and added into system test by Ed in #8325
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Followon to #7965 (mirror registry). mirror.gcr.io doesn't
cache all the images we need, and I can't find a way to
add to its cache, so let's just use quay.io for those
images that it can't serve.
Tools used:
skopeo copy --all docker://docker.io/library/alpine:3.10.2 \
docker://quay.io/libpod/alpine:3.10.2
...and also:
docker.io/library/alpine:3.2
docker.io/library/busybox:latest
docker.io/library/busybox:glibc
docker.io/library/busybox:1.30.1
docker.io/library/redis:alpine
docker.io/libpod/alpine-with-bogus-seccomp:label
docker.io/libpod/alpine-with-seccomp:label
docker.io/libpod/alpine_healthcheck:latest
docker.io/libpod/badhealthcheck:latest
Since most of those were new quay.io/libpod images, they required
going in through the quay.io GUI, image, settings, Make Public.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
With the advent of Podman 2.0.0 we crossed the magical barrier of go
modules. While we were able to continue importing all packages inside
of the project, the project could not be vendored anymore from the
outside.
Move the go module to new major version and change all imports to
`github.com/containers/libpod/v2`. The renaming of the imports
was done via `gomove` [1].
[1] https://github.com/KSubedi/gomove
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
when doing localized tests (not varlink), we can use secondary image
stores as read-only image caches. this cuts down on test time
significantly because each test does not need to restore the images from
a tarball anymore.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
a series of improvements to our ginkgo test framework so we can
get better ideas of whats going on when run in CI
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Add the ability to run the integration (ginkgo) suite using
the remote client.
Only the images_test.go file is run right now; all the rest are
isolated with a // +build !remotelinux. As more content is
developed for the remote client, we can unblock the files and
just block single tests as needed.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
like containers and images, users would benefit from being able to check
if a pod exists in local storage. if the pod exists, the return code is 0.
if the pod does not exists, the return code is 1. Any other return code
indicates a real errors, such as permissions or runtime.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Add an exists subcommand to podman container and podman image that allows
users to verify the existence of a container or image by ID or name. The return
code can be 0 (success), 1 (failed to find), or 125 (failed to work with runtime).
Issue #1845
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
