Value of `--force-compression` should be already `true` is
`--compression-format` is selected otherwise let users decide.
Signed-off-by: Aditya R <arajan@redhat.com>
Adds support for --force-compression which allows end-users to force
push blobs with the selected compresison in --compression option, in
order to make sure that blobs of other compression on registry are not
reused.
Signed-off-by: Aditya R <arajan@redhat.com>
Adds support for --force-compression which allows end-users to force
push blobs with the selected compresison in --compression option, in
order to make sure that blobs of other compression on registry are not
reused.
Is equivalent to: force-compression here: https://docs.docker.com/build/exporters/#compression
Closes: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/18660
Signed-off-by: Aditya R <arajan@redhat.com>
Remote clients only support the docker transport which is mentioned in
the destination table below. So drop the redundant text on supported
transports from the main description to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <vrothberg@redhat.com>
(podman push) and (podman manifest push) now support --sign-by-sigstore=param-file,
using the containers-sigstore-signing-params.yaml(5) file format.
That notably adds support for Fulcio and Rekor signing.
Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmač <mitr@redhat.com>
Trivial one: no human intervention needed, the man page text
was already identical between both files.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Ugh. This had about five different variations among twelve files.
I went with the version from podman-create, kube play, login, pull,
push, run. The others:
- manifest-add and create did not include the "true, false, missing"
text. Now they do. (If this text is N/A to these two, please yell).
Also, these two were written with "talking" instead of "contacting"
the registry.
- podman-build had "does not work with remote", but this
does not seem to be true, so I removed it. None of the
other files had that.
- the wording in podman-search is just weird, with "if needed"
and "is listed" and unclear "insecure registries". I just
nuked it all. If that wording was deliberate, for some reason
that applies only to podman-search, please yell.
- podman-container-runlabel has one diff that I like, actually
spelling out containers-registries.conf(5), but incorporating
that would make this even harder to review. I will add that
to my in-progress doc-cleanup PR.
Review recommendation: run hack/markdown-preprocess-review but
just quit out of it immediately (on both popups). Ignore it completely.
Then cd /tmp/markdown-preprocess-review.diffs/tls-verify and run
$ clear;for i in podman-*;do echo;echo $i;wdiff -t $i zzz-chosen.md;done
This will show the major diffs between each version and the chosen one.
Assumes you have wdiff installed. If you have another colorize-actual-
individual-word-diffs tool installed, use that. I like cdif[1].
[1] https://github.com/kaz-utashiro/sdif-tools
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
A NOP option. I chose the container word, of course, and the
word 'option' instead of 'flag'. I also hyphenated where needed.
I'm choosing to eliminate the "not on remote" text, because I
don't think it's true: podman-remote happily accepts that
flag on all those commands, including build. (It's marked
as hidden on build, but still accepted).
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
I've been doing the man-page cleanup distractedly, while
fighting other fires, and submitted some crap:
* #15339: I used single angle brackets, not double
* #15407: I only refactored --cert-dir from some man pages, not all
Easy to review with hack/markdown-preprocess-review, because all the
removed texts are identical. The only diff is that container-certs.d
is now a link.
Sorry about that. I'm going to spend more time being careful.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Refactor the --creds option. I went with the one in podman-pull
The main difference between all of them is the '####' line,
differences in the param descriptions. podman-pull had the
clearest one.
This is another one that hack/markdown-preprocess-review is
good for reviewing.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Refactor the --authfile option.
My suggestion for review:
1) run hack/markdown-preprocess-review and immediately Ctrl-Q to
quit out of diffuse, which is completely unusable for this
many files; then
2) cd /tmp/markdown-preprocess-review.diffs/authfile
- this is the directory created by the review script
3) rm podman-image-sign* podman-log* podman-search.1.md.in
- because they're essentially identical to podman-create
4) rm podman-manifest-* podman-push.*
- because they're 100% identical to podman-kube-play
5) rm podman-kube-play*
- because it's apart-from-whitespace identical to podman-build
(use "wdiff" to confirm)
6) rm podman-auto-update*
- because that's the one I chose (hence == zzz-chosen.md)
(You should obviously run your own diff/cmp before rm, to confirm
my assertions about which files are identical).
After all that, you have a manageable number of files which
you can scan, read, diff against zzz-chosen.md, even run diffuse.
This option is IMHO the poster child for why we need this kind
of man page refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
