From 781dfa1252b51f4d807454d5791e299804a1d380 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Allen Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:31:07 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] cleanup name publish argument tests 1. Don't bother testing the peer IDs. These commands won't ever use them. 2. Move the `--help` test out from in-between the missing argument tests. License: MIT Signed-off-by: Steven Allen --- test/sharness/t0100-name.sh | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/sharness/t0100-name.sh b/test/sharness/t0100-name.sh index 367262d4a..10e8b7ca4 100755 --- a/test/sharness/t0100-name.sh +++ b/test/sharness/t0100-name.sh @@ -94,21 +94,17 @@ test_expect_success "publish an explicit node ID as key name looks good" ' # test publishing nothing test_expect_success "'ipfs name publish' fails" ' - PEERID=`ipfs id --format=""` && - test_check_peerid "${PEERID}" && printf '' | test_expect_code 1 ipfs name publish >publish_out 2>&1 ' -test_expect_success "'ipfs name publish --help' succeeds" ' - PEERID=`ipfs id --format=""` && - test_check_peerid "${PEERID}" && - ipfs name publish --help -' - test_expect_success "publish output has the correct error" ' grep "argument \"ipfs-path\" is required" publish_out ' +test_expect_success "'ipfs name publish --help' succeeds" ' + ipfs name publish --help +' + test_launch_ipfs_daemon test_expect_success "empty request to name publish doesn't panic and returns error" '