Issue number: N/A
---------
## What is the current behavior?
Item includes `ion-anchor` in the list of clickable components it
queries. This component was renamed to `ion-router-link` in
[v5](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/BREAKING_ARCHIVE/v5.md#anchor).
## What is the new behavior?
Updates the reference to `ion-anchor` to `ion-router-link` in
`ion-item`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
Issue number: resolves#29640
---------
## What is the current behavior?
(Angular) If a list inside of a popover contains a disabled item and is
included in the following way:
```html
<ion-list>
<ion-item [button]="true">Option 1</ion-item>
<ion-item [button]="true" [disabled]="true">Option 2</ion-item>
<ion-item [button]="true">Option 3</ion-item>
</ion-list>
```
when you try to navigate using the arrow down keys, it will stop at the
disabled item instead of continuing over it.
Note that changing the item to the following will work:
```html
<ion-item [button]="true" disabled="true">Option 2</ion-item>
```
## What is the new behavior?
Reflect the `disabled` property in the item so that when items are
queried in the popover, the arrow down key skips over the disabled item.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Other information
This can be tested in the Angular test app by following the
documentation here:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/angular/testing.md
Removing my fix in `core`, then running `npm run build` and re-syncing
the test app should reproduce the problem.
Issue number: internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
The `ion-button` component is used in several tests to navigate or show
overlays. This causes screenshot diffs in unrelated tests any time the
UI of the `ion-button` is updated.
## What is the new behavior?
Removes the `ion-button` elements from unrelated tests.
Did not remove the `ion-button`s from the following tests:
- All `ion-button`s in an `ion-buttons` component
- An `ion-button` inside of a menu
- breadcrumbs/test/basic (uses a clear button in a list header, needs to
be moved)
- input/test/slot
- item/test/buttons
- item/test/colors
- item/test/dividers
- item/test/inputs
- item/test/media
- list-header/test/basic
- ripple-effect/test/basic
- router/test/basic
- router/test/guards
- router-outlet/test/basic
- select/test/slot
- textarea/test/slot
Updates the icon/basic test to use the right icon names by comparing
against the v3 names: https://ionicframework.com/docs/v3/ionicons/
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: resolves#29386
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The item border does not have sufficient contrast in dark mode making
the border almost invisible.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the `--ion-border-color` in the MD dark palette. Instead,
we're using the [theme
default](dc1172a841/core/src/themes/ionic.theme.default.md.scss (L31)).
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
The earliest reference to the offending line Brandy and I could find was
[here](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/18713#issuecomment-510644371).
Issue number: N/A
---------
## What is the current behavior?
Currently, every Sass variable in Ionic has the `!default` flag added to
the end.
From the [Sass variables
documentation](https://sass-lang.com/documentation/variables/):
> Normally when you assign a value to a variable, if that variable
already had a value, its old value is overwritten. But if you’re writing
a Sass library, you might want to allow your users to configure your
library’s variables before you use them to generate CSS.
>
> To make this possible, Sass provides the `!default` flag. This assigns
a value to a variable only if that variable isn’t defined or its value
is [null](https://sass-lang.com/documentation/values/null). Otherwise,
the existing value will be used.
In past versions of Ionic Framework, developers wrote Sass variables to
rebuild Ionic Framework using their own values. In the latest versions
of Ionic Framework, this is not possible.
## What is the new behavior?
Removes the `!default` flag from all Sass variables.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
-------
Co-authored-by: brandyscarney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/27134 we fixed a
bug for item button colors on dark mode. We added a test for this in
dark mode, but it was created before we had the infrastructure to test
dark mode within Playwright. As a result, the dark mode theme is hard
coded into the test.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- This test has been simplified to only test the things we need to test
- It also relies on the built-in dark theme testing instead of hard
coding the theme.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
In Ionic Framework v7, we [simplified the form control
syntax](https://ionic.io/blog/ionic-7-is-here#simplified-form-control-syntax),
eliminating the requirement to place form controls inside of an
`ion-item`. We ensured backwards compatibility by introducing a `legacy`
property for the form controls and keeping, but deprecating, the
following CSS variables on item:
```css
--highlight-color-focused
--highlight-color-invalid
--highlight-color-valid
--highlight-height
```
While this was supported in v7, console warnings were logged to notify
developers that they needed to update to the modern syntax if they were
using form controls in an item for the best accessibility experience.
## What is the new behavior?
Removes the `--highlight-color-focused`, `--highlight-color-invalid`,
`--highlight-color-valid`, and `--highlight-height` variables from item.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
Steps taken to mitigate this breaking change:
1. Developers have had console warnings when using the legacy syntax
since the v7 release and the variables were marked as `deprecated`.
2. The removal of these CSS variables has been documented in the
Breaking Changes document with a link to the migration guides for the
affected form controls.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The following CSS variables have been removed from item:
`--highlight-height`, `--highlight-color-focused`,
`--highlight-color-valid`, and `--highlight-color-invalid`. These
variables were used on the bottom border highlight of an item when the
form control inside of that item was focused. The form control syntax
was [simplified in
v7](https://ionic.io/blog/ionic-7-is-here#simplified-form-control-syntax)
so that inputs, selects, and textareas would no longer be required to be
used inside of an item.
If you have not yet migrated to the modern form control syntax,
migration guides for each of the form controls that added a highlight to
item can be found below:
- [Input migration
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/input#migrating-from-legacy-input-syntax)
- [Select migration
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/select#migrating-from-legacy-select-syntax)
- [Textarea migration
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/textarea#migrating-from-legacy-textarea-syntax)
The highlight variables should then be moved from the item to the form
control:
```diff
- ion-item {
+ ion-input,
+ ion-textarea,
+ ion-select {
--highlight-color-focused: purple;
--highlight-color-valid: blue;
--highlight-color-invalid: orange;
--highlight-height: 6px;
}
```
> [!NOTE]
> The input and textarea components are scoped, which means they will
automatically scope their CSS by appending each of the styles with an
additional class at runtime. Overriding scoped selectors in CSS requires
a [higher
specificity](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Specificity)
selector. Targeting the `ion-input` or `ion-textarea` for customization
will not work; therefore we recommend adding a class and customizing it
that way.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean@ionic.io>
BREAKING CHANGE:
- The `helper` slot has been removed. Developers should use the `helperText` property on `ion-input` and `ion-textarea`.
- The `error` slot has been removed. Developers should use the `errorText` property on `ion-input` and `ion-textarea`.
- Counter functionality has been removed including the `counter` and `counterFormatter` properties. Developers should use the properties of the same name on `ion-input` and `ion-textarea`.
- The `fill` property has been removed. Developers should use the property of the same name on `ion-input`, `ion-select`, and `ion-textarea`.
- The `shape` property has been removed. Developers should use the property of the same name on `ion-input`, `ion-select`, and `ion-textarea`.
resolves#21982
BREAKING CHANGE:
- Item no longer automatically delegates focus to the first focusable element. While most developers should not need to make any changes to account for this update, usages of `ion-item` with interactive elements such as form controls (inputs, textareas, etc) should be evaluated to verify that interactions still work as expected.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved placing an `ion-range` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have been removed from range. For more information on migrating from the legacy range syntax, refer to the [Range documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/range#migrating-from-legacy-range-syntax).
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved placing an `ion-checkbox` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have been removed from checkbox. For more information on migrating from the legacy checkbox syntax, refer to the [Checkbox documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/checkbox#migrating-from-legacy-checkbox-syntax).
- Fix Internal issue (FW-5205) - Removed the build conditional in the
`item` component since the previous issue is already fixed in Stencil.
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
- No changes were made in terms of behavior.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- No changes were made in terms of behavior so it will work as before.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
- Spec tests still pass even after this change (we can see below the
results before and after the change)
- Ran the command `npm run test.spec
src/components/item/test/item.spec.ts
src/components/item/test/item.spec.tsx`
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved placing an `ion-radio` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have been removed from radio. For more information on migrating from the legacy radio syntax, refer to the [Radio documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/radio#migrating-from-legacy-radio-syntax).
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved placing an `ion-toggle` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have been removed from toggle. For more information on migrating from the legacy toggle syntax, refer to the [Toggle documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/toggle#migrating-from-legacy-toggle-syntax).
Issue number: internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
In Ionic Framework v7, we [simplified the select
syntax](https://ionic.io/blog/ionic-7-is-here#simplified-form-control-syntax)
so that it was no longer required to be placed inside of an `ion-item`.
We maintained backwards compatibility by adding a `legacy` property
which allowed it to continue to be styled properly when written in the
following way:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-label>Label</ion-label>
<ion-select></ion-select>
</ion-item>
```
While this was supported in v7, console warnings were logged to notify
developers that they needed to update this syntax for the best
accessibility experience.
## What is the new behavior?
- Removes the `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax.
Developers should follow the [migration
guide](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/select#migrating-from-legacy-select-syntax)
in the select documentation to update their apps. The new syntax
requires a `label` or `aria-label` on `ion-select`:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-select label="Label"></ion-select>
</ion-item>
```
- Removes the legacy tests under under `select/test/legacy/` and all
related screenshots
- Removes the select usage from `item/test/disabled`,
`item/test/legacy/alignment`, and `item/test/legacy/disabled` and all
related screenshots if the test was removed
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
1. Developers have had console warnings when using the legacy syntax
since the v7 release. The migration guide for the new select syntax is
outlined in the [Select
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/select#migrating-from-legacy-select-syntax).
2. This change has been documented in the Breaking Changes document with
a link to the migration guide.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved
placing an `ion-select` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`,
have been removed from select. For more information on migrating from
the legacy select syntax, refer to the [Select
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/select#migrating-from-legacy-select-syntax).
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
In Ionic Framework v7, we [simplified the input
syntax](https://ionic.io/blog/ionic-7-is-here#simplified-form-control-syntax)
so that it was no longer required to be placed inside of an `ion-item`.
We maintained backwards compatibility by adding a `legacy` property
which allowed it to continue to be styled properly when written in the
following way:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-label>Label</ion-label>
<ion-input></ion-input>
</ion-item>
```
While this was supported in v7, console warnings were logged to notify
developers that they needed to update this syntax for the best
accessibility experience.
## What is the new behavior?
- Removes the `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax.
Developers should follow the [migration
guide](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/input#migrating-from-legacy-input-syntax)
in the input documentation to update their apps. The new syntax requires
a `label` or `aria-label` on `ion-input`:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-input label="Label"></ion-input>
</ion-item>
```
- Removes the legacy tests under under `input/test/legacy/` and all
related screenshots
- Removes the input usage from `item/test/a11y`, `item/test/counter`,
`item/test/disabled`, `item/test/highlight`,
`item/test/legacy/alignment`, `item/test/legacy/disabled`,
`item/test/legacy/fill`, and `item/test/legacy/form` and all related
screenshots if the test was removed
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
1. Developers have had console warnings when using the legacy syntax
since the v7 release. The migration guide for the new input syntax is
outlined in the [Input
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/input#migrating-from-legacy-input-syntax).
2. This change has been documented in the Breaking Changes document with
a link to the migration guide.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved
placing an `ion-input` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have
been removed from input. For more information on migrating from the
legacy input syntax, refer to the [Input
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/input#migrating-from-legacy-input-syntax).
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
⚠️ This is a combination of previously approved PRs with the
exception of
fe9dca513c.
This change was made as a result of
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework-design-documents/pull/248.
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Users do not have a way of increasing the contrast in Ionic apps. This
is valuable for people with low vision as increasing the contrast
between foreground and background content helps improve readability.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds a high contrast light and high contrast dark theme. As with our
other themes, developers can choose between system, class, and always
stylesheets.
While we aim to improve contrast for text and UI components, this
feature prioritizes text in the event that both text and UI component
cannot be improved without one negatively impacting the other.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.7-dev.11706894781.1cd59fde`
Testing instructions:
1. Open `src/themes/test/css-variables`. Activate the high contrast
light and dark themes to verify that contrast does increase.
2. Use the dev build to integrate the theme into a test app (conference
app, starter app, etc).
I'd recommend using these imports:
```css
@import "@ionic/angular/css/themes/high-contrast.system.css";
@import "@ionic/angular/css/themes/high-contrast-dark.system.css";
```
Note: Make sure this is imported **after** `core.scss`
---------
Co-authored-by: Shawn Taylor <shawn@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
In Ionic Framework v7, we [simplified the textarea
syntax](https://ionic.io/blog/ionic-7-is-here#simplified-form-control-syntax)
so that it was no longer required to be placed inside of an `ion-item`.
We maintained backwards compatibility by adding a `legacy` property
which allowed it to continue to be styled properly when written in the
following way:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-label>Label</ion-label>
<ion-textarea></ion-textarea>
</ion-item>
```
While this was supported in v7, console warnings were logged to notify
developers that they needed to update this syntax for the best
accessibility experience.
## What is the new behavior?
- Removes the `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax.
Developers should follow the [migration
guide](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/textarea#migrating-from-legacy-textarea-syntax)
in the textarea documentation to update their apps. The new syntax
requires a `label` or `aria-label` on `ion-textarea`:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-textarea label="Label"></ion-textarea>
</ion-item>
```
- Removes the legacy tests under `textarea/test/legacy/` and all related
screenshots
- Removes the textarea usage in `input/test/legacy/spec`,
`item/test/disabled`, `item/test/legacy/disabled` and
`item/test/legacy/fill`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
1. Developers have had console warnings when using the legacy syntax
since the v7 release. The migration guide for the new textarea syntax is
outlined in the [Textarea
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/textarea#migrating-from-legacy-textarea-syntax).
2. This change has been documented in the Breaking Changes document with
a link to the migration guide.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved
placing an `ion-textarea` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`,
have been removed from textarea. For more information on migrating from
the legacy textarea syntax, refer to the [Textarea
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/textarea#migrating-from-legacy-textarea-syntax).
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Several tests were still using the legacy form syntax.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrated tests in `core`, `angular`, and `vue` to use the modern form
syntax (`react` did not have form controls).
I opted not to migrate `item/test/highlight` and `item/test/counter`
because those tests are going to be removed in the future once the
deprecate item APIs are removed.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#28769
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
As part of https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28146, we
allowed text wrapping inside of `ion-item` for accessibility purposes.
One of the behaviors we added was to allow start, default, and end
slotted containers to wrap to the next line to align with the iOS spec.
However, this decision was based on an incorrect assumption.
The following screenshot shows the Settings app on iOS:
| default scale | 310% scale |
| - | - |
| <img width="1170" alt="Frame 4"
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/2721089/462ef153-a060-41c8-9a00-f0aad17839be">
| <img width="1170" alt="Frame 5"
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/2721089/f047f880-7b80-4710-939b-96da075fbbf9">
|
At the default scale, the blue icon is in the iOS equivalent of the
"start" slot, "Bluetooth" is in the default slot, and "On" is in the
"end" slot. We incorrectly assumed the same markup was true when scaling
the text up. However, at 310% scale the icon, "Bluetooth" text, and "On"
text all become part of the default slot in a single container that
wraps. You can tell because the bottom border runs underneath the blue
icon at 310% whereas it does not at the default scale. This allows the
text to wrap underneath the blue icon. When we originally implemented
#28146 we thought that this meant the start, default, and end slot
containers should wrap to the next line.
I further validated this behavior by creating an app with Swift UI. I
created a list of items where each item has the native equivalent of a
checkbox in the `start` slot and multiple `ion-labels` in the default
slot of the item:
| Default Scale | 310% Scale |
| - | - |
|
|
|
The content within each label wraps within the container, but the
containers themselves never wrap to the next line.
Demo code:
```swift
import SwiftUI
struct ContentView: View {
struct Item: Identifiable, Hashable {
let id = UUID()
}
private var items = [
Item(),
Item(),
Item(),
Item(),
Item()
]
@State private var multiSelection = Set<UUID>()
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List(items, selection: $multiSelection) {_ in
HStack {
Text("Column 1 with really long text")
Text("Column 2 with really long text")
Text("Column 3 with really long text")
Text("Column 4 with really long text")
}
}
.toolbar { EditButton() }
}
Text("\(multiSelection.count) selections")
}
}
#Preview {
ContentView()
}
```
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- This PR removes the ability for the start, default, and end slot
containers to wrap to the next line. This behavior aligns with
pre-v7.6.0 behaviors. The containers inside of the default slot will not
wrap to the next line. However, content within each container (such as
text within an `ion-label`) will continue to wrap to meet the team's
accessibility requirements.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.5-dev.11704916749.1e64a3a7`
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: resolves#28525
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When navigated via tab-key, the ion-item is not highlighted correctly
after switching from button=false to button=true.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
Now, when dynamically changing the the `button` option to `True`,
there's a `@watch` callback that will make sure the internal
`isFocusable` `@state` will be updated.
- A new unit test was added to item/test. As there was still any unit
test for the `ion-item`, a new files was created - `item.spec.tsx`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
New behavior in runtime:
---------
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean@ionic.io>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The team would like to ensure that Ionic Framework components that use
an Ionic color (primary, secondary, etc) on top of a contrast color pass
minimum contrast ratios as defined in the WCAG.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Introduces a revised set of Ionic colors that pass AA color contrast
guidelines when with the appropriate contrast.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandy@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Shawn Taylor <shawn@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The Toggle styles do not match iOS 17.
| iOS 17 Screenshot | New Design | Ionic |
| --------------------------------------------- |
------------------------------------------------------- |
------------------------------------------------- |
| 
| 
| 
|
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The Toggle handle box shadow matches iOS 17 specs
- The Toggle height matches iOS 17 specs
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
While working on an unrelated task, I noticed the list items in the list
starter app run off the page. This is due to the text wrapping behavior
in v7.6 where we allows the labels to grow/shrink. However, we do not
set a limit on how much they can grow. This means that child elements
inside of `ion-label` with long text can cause the label container to
grow indefinitely.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Labels in item have a max-width of 100%
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.1-dev.11702498225.1ad6eda6`
| before | after |
| - | - |
| 
| 
|
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
We currently apply a workaround to `ion-select` so it can wrap correctly
inside of `ion-item`:
357b8b2beb/core/src/components/select/select.scss (L99-L103)
However, this causes issues when a parent element has `display: flex`
because the `ion-select` width becomes 0.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- In order to get the desired behavior, we need the `ion-select` (and
other elements in the default slot) to either truncate or wrap within
its own container and then have the entire container (i.e. the entire
`ion-select`) wrap to the next line once the container is too small.
To achieve this, I needed to set a min-width on `.item-inner` to define
the point at which the element should wrap to the next line. I also
changed the flex basis from `auto` to `0` which means the initial main
size of the flex item will be 0px. In reality, this will be
`--inner-min-width` since we also set `min-width:
var(--inner-min-width)`. I used `0` for simplicity but I can change this
to use the CSS variable if that's more clear. Since we also set
`flex-grow: 1` we indicate that the element can grow from that basis
(but it cannot shrink).
I chose `--inner-min-width: 4rem` to minimize the number of diffs. We
can certainly change this, but it may cause some diffs as certain
elements will start wrapping sooner. I also chose to use `rem` because
having a fixed min-width means that fewer characters are going to fit in
the same space as text scales.
I made this a CSS variable but left it undocumented. If developers need
a way of changing this `min-width` they can request it and we can easily
expose this variable. However, I think `4rem` is small enough that this
should be sufficient.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
The visual diffs here are correct. The table below shows the screenshot
group and an explanation for why the changes are correct.
| Path | Example | Details |
| - | - | - |
| `disabled` |
[Link](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28631/files#diff-d529716f95f7a7aa82c88588104220775b728af67077f48cd47a8afa04423143)
| The searchbar is able to shrink slightly to fit on the same line as
the checkbox at the bottom. |
| `highlight` |
[Link](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28631/files#diff-0b64f24c91393923701d1ced4e330a1c6b926d72ee461b8ab1e135e708be3457)
| We're changing how small the main content can get, so the input is
only wrapping once it gets to `--inner-min-width`. |
| `legacy/fill` |
[Link](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28631/files#diff-2ef8dbfa5e69e2b96c3e1ed29ab962f08cf5ba2aaf2af773e40bd143e38a4bef)
| We're changing how small the main content can get, so the input is
only wrapping once it gets to `--inner-min-width`. |
| `slotted-inputs` |
[Link](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28631/files#diff-2f173c7303969d6a6c58f30a618cebc3caf918d3761fc83df5642fd48dfabd7b)
| We're changing how small the main content can get, so the range is
only wrapping once it gets to `--inner-min-width`. |
`slotted-inputs` note: I'd argue many of these examples are not best
practices. For example, adding a range in the start slot and the end
slot is a bit unusual. I'm not aware of any native apps that implement
this pattern.
popover note: I [removed the `ion-item` from the `popover/test/async`
test](331fcb859c).
There was a diff because the min-width increased, but IMO that component
should not be used in the popover test since we want to test the
popover, not the item.
--------
Demo:
| `feature-7.6` | `branch` |
| - | - |
| <video
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/2721089/693d4947-fa33-460d-bc7f-7b96b6338032"></video>
| <video
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/2721089/df35ca73-87aa-4e76-9bb7-99f0f2810640"></video>
|
(In this demo I updated the `ion-select` to wrap within its own
container first instead of truncate. We may want to consider doing this
by default, but I think this is out of scope for this task)
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandy@ionic.io>
When an item containing a select is used inside of a flex container, the item collapses to `0px` width. Example code:
```html
<div style="display: flex">
<ion-item>
<ion-select aria-label="fruit" placeholder="Select fruit">
<ion-select-option value="apples">Apples</ion-select-option>
<ion-select-option value="oranges">Oranges</ion-select-option>
<ion-select-option value="bananas">Bananas</ion-select-option>
</ion-select>
</ion-item>
</div>
```
This change sets the flex property to `1` on `ion-item` so that it will grow inside of a flex container, resulting in the select being displayed. The `flex` property is ignored when item is inside of a block container.
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Type checking inside of the Stencil unit tests have been disabled for a
long time. This has resulted in a difficult developer experience and
numerous issues (both types and implementation) within our unit tests.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Type checking is now enabled for all Stencil unit tests
- Tests have been updated to resolve type errors and implementation
errors
- Many `as any` casts were introduced, as many legacy tests test invalid
configurations of functions that require it (for example passing
`undefined` to an argument that cannot be `undefined`).
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
To test this PR you can checkout the branch locally. Install
dependencies in the `/core` directory to make sure you are on at least
`@stencil/core@4.7.2`.
Opening either a `.spec.ts` or `.spec.tsx` file, validate that your IDE
detects types and can provide auto completions for jest global types.
If you desire, you can provide an invalid type and try building the
project - you will observe the build will fail due to the invalid type.
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The safe area for Item would change sides when the direction changed.
e.g., if the safe area padding should be on the left, it would be on the
left when the direction was LTR but would be on the right when the
direction was RTL. It should always be on the left.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The left safe area padding is on the left side of Item whether the
direction is LTR or RTL.
- The right safe area padding is on the right side of Item whether the
direction is LTR or RTL.
- There's now a screenshot test for left and right padding for both
directions.
Note: There is a separate ticket for updating the safe area padding for
ion-item-divider.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
