Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `ion-header` and `ion-footer` use a base64 encoded image for a box
shadow instead of using the CSS box-shadow property directly. The use of
the background image creates CSP violations. The historic reasoning of
using an image instead of box shadow was to improve scroll performance.
Browsers and devices have improved a lot since that was implemented (5
years ago).
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates the usage of `ion-header` and `ion-footer` to use a box
shadow. The value comes from Material's web implementation:
https://material-components.github.io/material-components-web-catalog/#/component/top-app-bar
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Bumps [@playwright/test](https://github.com/Microsoft/playwright) from
1.33.0 to 1.34.0.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/Microsoft/playwright/releases"><code>@playwright/test</code>'s
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v1.34.0</h2>
<h3>Highlights</h3>
<ul>
<li>
<p>UI Mode now shows steps, fixtures and attachments:
<!-- raw HTML omitted --></p>
</li>
<li>
<p>New property <a
href="https://playwright.dev/docs/api/class-testproject#test-project-teardown"><code>testProject.teardown</code></a>
to specify a project that needs to run after this
and all dependent projects have finished. Teardown is useful to cleanup
any resources acquired by this project.</p>
<p>A common pattern would be a <code>setup</code> dependency with a
corresponding <code>teardown</code>:</p>
<pre lang="js"><code>// playwright.config.ts
import { defineConfig } from '@playwright/test';
<p>export default defineConfig({
projects: [
{
name: 'setup',
testMatch: /global.setup.ts/,
teardown: 'teardown',
},
{
name: 'teardown',
testMatch: /global.teardown.ts/,
},
{
name: 'chromium',
use: devices['Desktop Chrome'],
dependencies: ['setup'],
},
{
name: 'firefox',
use: devices['Desktop Firefox'],
dependencies: ['setup'],
},
{
name: 'webkit',
use: devices['Desktop Safari'],
dependencies: ['setup'],
},
],
});
</code></pre></p>
</li>
<li>
<p>New method <a
href="https://playwright.dev/docs/test-assertions#expectconfigure"><code>expect.configure</code></a>
to create pre-configured expect instance with its own defaults such as
<code>timeout</code> and <code>soft</code>.</p>
<pre lang="js"><code>const slowExpect = expect.configure({ timeout:
10000 });
await slowExpect(locator).toHaveText('Submit');
<p>// Always do soft assertions.
const softExpect = expect.configure({ soft: true });
</code></pre></p>
</li>
</ul>
<!-- raw HTML omitted -->
</blockquote>
<p>... (truncated)</p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="4aee014caf"><code>4aee014</code></a>
chore: mark 1.34.0 (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/Microsoft/playwright/issues/23123">#23123</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="bf25a93617"><code>bf25a93</code></a>
cherry-pick(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/Microsoft/playwright/issues/23171">#23171</a>):
fix(tracing): when zipping remotely, use correct file na...</li>
<li><a
href="7effaf4f22"><code>7effaf4</code></a>
cherry-pick(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/Microsoft/playwright/issues/23166">#23166</a>):
chore: fix file view padding</li>
<li><a
href="ef18287266"><code>ef18287</code></a>
cherry-pick(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/Microsoft/playwright/issues/23165">#23165</a>):
docs: update release notes</li>
<li><a
href="552cba8c05"><code>552cba8</code></a>
cherry-pick(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/Microsoft/playwright/issues/23148">#23148</a>):
chore: do not annotate actions after failed ones as time...</li>
<li><a
href="cd94a3f01d"><code>cd94a3f</code></a>
cherry-pick(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/Microsoft/playwright/issues/23144">#23144</a>):
feat(connect): <code>pw:server:channel</code> and <code>pw:socks</code>
debug ...</li>
<li><a
href="3543a741fd"><code>3543a74</code></a>
cherry-pick(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/Microsoft/playwright/issues/23140">#23140</a>):
docs: add dialog/consoleMessage helper methods for langu...</li>
<li><a
href="7196f82e52"><code>7196f82</code></a>
cherry-pick(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/Microsoft/playwright/issues/23143">#23143</a>):
test: add attachment tests</li>
<li><a
href="32c247b815"><code>32c247b</code></a>
cherry-pick(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/Microsoft/playwright/issues/23139">#23139</a>):
chore: opt out of trace attachments</li>
<li><a
href="c551cce74e"><code>c551cce</code></a>
cherry-pick(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/Microsoft/playwright/issues/23130">#23130</a>):
feat(chromium): roll to r1064 (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/Microsoft/playwright/issues/23132">#23132</a>)</li>
<li>Additional commits viewable in <a
href="https://github.com/Microsoft/playwright/compare/v1.33.0...v1.34.0">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
---------
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: resolves#27184
---------
## What is the current behavior?
The modern form controls do not use the same opacity for their labels
when disabled, resulting in inconsistent UI when using two different
types in the same view (select vs checkbox, for example).
## What is the new behavior?
The checkbox, input, radio, range, select, textarea and toggle labels
have been updated on both modes to use the same opacity as each other
when disabled. The checkbox and radio icons have been updated to use a
different opacity than the label for `md` mode.
- Updates `ios` mode so all form controls use the same opacity of `0.3`
- I could not find any guidelines by Apple for what color these should
be, so I decided to just make them the same as what is most commonly
used & match item
- Updates `md` mode so all form control labels use the same opacity of
`0.38`
- I used the [Material Design 3
documentation](https://m2.material.io/components) to get this number as
well as the opacity of the disabled selection controls in the [Material
Design 2 figma design
kit](https://www.figma.com/community/file/778763161265841481). The
Material Design 2 documentation does not mention the opacity, but this
is also the number used by Material Design 1 so it's safe to assume it
is what the disabled form labels should also use for Material Design 2.
- Updates the `md` range so the slotted elements are also included when
setting the opacity on the label
- Updates the range, radio & checkbox tests to make sure there are
screenshots in the different disabled states
- Updates the item/disabled test to include radio & textarea so you can
see all form controls side by side
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Other information
I downloaded screenshots of the item disabled tests and put them side by
side for `main` and this branch in order to see the differences in the
labels. The grey boxes to the left of each item are just a bigger
version of the label color for that item, so it's easier to see when
they aren't the same.
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: resolves#27129
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Material Design has 16px of margin between the form control and the
label, but we have 8px:
https://m2.material.io/components/selection-controls#usage
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates default margin from 8px to 16px for checkbox, input, radio,
range, select, textarea, and toggle.
Note: This should only apply to labels that are on the same line as the
form control. In other words, they do not apply to stacked/floating
labels.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: resolves#27116
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
With `ion-input`, `ion-select`, or `ion-textarea` using
`fill="outline"`, applying a large value for the `--border-radius` CSS
prop causes the radius to render differently on the left and right
sides:
This is due to the structure of the outline container, which is used to
render the empty space in the border when a `stacked` or `floating`
label floats upwards. The container has three pieces, which combine to
form a seamless-looking border:
The issue is that the browser will only render a radius that fits within
the element's dimensions, and the piece on the left side (or right on
RTL) is not wide enough.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
While we could fix this issue by making the left-side piece wider (and
there was originally a PR for this at
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/27459), it was
decided to not include this fix in Ionic automatically. This is because
the fix does not work for `label-placement="stacked"` or `"floating"`;
the notch spacer (the middle piece of the outline) is pushed to the
side, leading to broken visuals:
We decided that introducing inconsistent behavior across different
values for `label-placement` would be confusing for developers. Even if
we did restructure the outline container to position the notch spacer
correctly, it could easily be made to fall on the curve of the border,
creating awkward visuals.
Instead, developers looking to use a large `--border-radius` with
`fill="outline"` should either increase `--padding-start` to be at least
as high as the `--border-radius` (which will increase the width of the
left outline piece while also moving the floating label in step), or use
`shape="round"` (which will change both the padding and border radius
automatically). This PR documents this workaround in the
`--border-radius` description.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Input had two spec files for the same behavior. The only difference was
the file type: `.ts` and `.tsx`
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Merged the spec test into one file
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
N/A
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The team has observed that Playwright's default screenshot diff
threshold of 0.2 is not sensitive enough, and screenshots that should be
getting updated are not getting updated.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates the threshold to 0.1
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Input tests use legacy syntax
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Input tests use modern syntax
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
This is the first PR to introduce the infrastructure required to add
test generators to the Ionic Framework project. This PR introduces the
file name changes necessary to support two playwright configs, so I
recommend reviewing the PR by commit:
1e5012cea1
- Created a `playwright.config-legacy.ts` file and updates
`package.json`.
- Running `npm run test.e2e` will run the generator tests, and running
`npm run test.e2e.legacy` will run the legacy tests.
4fe8de7df7
- Updates the GitHub Action scripts to run both the modern and legacy
E2E tests. I added command modifiers to avoid collisions with output
directories.
e8bcfaf926
- Updates `*.e2e.ts` files to have the legacy format name:
`*.e2e-legacy.ts`. This naming scheme is required for the two Playwright
configs to pull in the correct files. When migrating tests to
generators, team members will rename the file to remove the `-legacy`
part.
5bf196c36d
(warning: lots of files!)
- Updates the `*.e2e.ts-snapshots` directories to have the legacy format
name: `*.e2e-legacy.ts-snapshots`. The screenshot directory in
Playwright is generated based on the test file name which is why we are
updating the screenshot directory. When migrating tests to generators,
team members will rename the directory to remove the `-legacy` part.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue URL: resolves#27086
---------
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When an `ion-select` is inside a card, the label is slightly lower than
it should be, making it out of alignment with the label of an
`ion-input`.
<!-- Issues are required for both bug fixes and features. -->
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- When inside a card, the labels of `ion-input` and `ion-select` are in
line with each other.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
This bug was occurring because the label of ion-select is in the shadow
DOM. [As
recommended](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27086#issuecomment-1494427311),
this fix was also added to ion-input and ion-textarea in case those
labels are also later moved to the shadow DOM.
Before:
<img width="534" alt="Screenshot 2023-04-13 at 4 35 44 PM"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/14926794/231877123-02f8e381-2137-4d3c-8dab-ae9051ad3591.png">
After:
<img width="535" alt="Screenshot 2023-04-13 at 4 36 02 PM"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/14926794/231877151-bd49b87b-762a-4d20-b6b7-57c1ab3bb368.png">
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: resolves#27249
---------
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The cloned input/textarea for scroll assist is not sized correctly. For
legacy inputs, this causes the clone to be off by ~1px because it does
not have the correct height. For modern inputs, this causes the same bug
as the legacy inputs plus cloned inputs overlap any floating/stacked
labels. This was not a concern for legacy inputs because those inputs
did not contain the label element where modern inputs do.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Sets `bottom: 0` for cloned inputs so they have the correct height
- Sets `position: relative` on the `.native-wrapper` so the cloned input
does not flow outside of the parent container.
**Before**
| Modern Input | Legacy Input |
| - | - |
| <video
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2721089/233385644-3c15f98e-2646-41e1-b206-34c505791bde.MP4"></video>
| <video
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2721089/233385681-8d682222-44b4-4cdc-b0de-96ed3fd38792.MP4"></video>
|
(Note: The legacy input bug is subtle -- the input only shifts by ~1px)
**After**
| Modern Input | Legacy Input |
| - | - |
| <video
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2721089/233385911-243dea95-39b4-4d81-bfe9-26e52382a702.mp4"></video>
| <video
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2721089/233386237-2c9eede3-ca91-429b-8a35-15428529a883.mp4"></video>
|
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The team decided on some new processes for adding tests. One of those
processes is that test directories should use kebab case.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates test directories to use kebab case
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue URL: resolves#27218
---------
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Padding is not applied to the `.native-textarea` element when using a
legacy textarea. It is applied in v6:
ae9689bf3e/core/src/components/textarea/textarea.scss (L98-L100)
The modern textarea is not impacted.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Padding is now added to `.native-textarea` with the legacy textarea.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `InputChangeEventDetail` and `InputInputEventDetail` interfaces were
updated to add a number type to the value key:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/26176
This was done to align with the value property on ion-input which allows
for strings and numbers. However, this is incorrect as the value emitted
is always forced to a string:
c9bddbdb4c/core/src/components/input/input.tsx (L416)
We likely copied the the type definition for the `value` prop not
realizing that number values are never emitted.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The `InputChangeEventDetail` and `InputInputEventDetail` interfaces no
longer have the `number` type
- The value passed to `ionInput` is converted to a string. (This isn't
really needed since the native `<input>` element will have a type of
string when the user types, but I added it for consistency with the
`ionChange` emission).
- Added a code comment to highlight this behavior
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
Note: This is not a breaking change because `number` values were never
emitted in the first place.
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Developers that are using Ionic v7 are experiencing an issue where
implementations that are intended to use the modern control syntax will
render with the legacy syntax and a warning will be displayed.
The issue is most easily reproduced by not assigning a label to the
control and then asynchronously assigning a label after a duration.
Angular example:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-input [label]="label"></ion-input>
</ion-item>
```
```ts
@Component({ ... })
export class MyComponent {
@Input() label?: string; // initially unset
ngOnInit() {
setTimeout(() => this.label = 'Hello world', 500);
}
}
```
<!-- Issues are required for both bug fixes and features. -->
Issue URL: resolves#27085
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Form controls that do not have a decorative label or
`aria-label`/`aria-labelledby` assigned, will default render as modern
controls.
- Legacy form implementations that render an `<ion-label>` within the
item, will continue to render with the legacy template and a warning
will be displayed in the console.
- Modern form syntax supports dynamically set labels
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
Legacy implementations that do not have a decorative label and do not
specify `aria-label` on the control, will be upgraded to the modern
syntax.
For example:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-input></ion-input>
</ion-item>
```
Developers that do not want to update to the modern syntax yet should
add the `legacy="true"` attribute to their form control.
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `7.0.2-dev.11681157690.1060bc7f`
When migrating the range tests to modern syntax, I observed a visual
clipping issue. This is being addressed in:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/27188. This PR simply
adds the legacy flag so that screenshots are the same as `main`.
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
There are tests for `ion-input` that are not in the `/legacy` test
folder, that are using invalid modern syntax.
Inversely, there is legacy tests that do not explicitly set
`legacy="true"` that will be updated the modern syntax when
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/27156 is merged.
<!-- Issues are required for both bug fixes and features. -->
Issue URL: N/A
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates modern tests to use modern label syntax (using `aria-label`)
- Applies `legacy="true"` to legacy test templates
- Fixes a typo in a legacy test where the selector was incorrect
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `setFocus` method does not mention extra implementation details
required when working within an overlay.
<!-- Issues are required for both bug fixes and features. -->
Issue URL: N/A
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds additional detail about how to use `setFocus()` when inside an
overlay
- Aligns the `ion-searchbar` documentation to match the `ion-input`
documentation
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
## Pull request checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [ ] Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
- [ ] Docs have been reviewed and added / updated if needed (for bug
fixes / features)
- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See the [contributing
guide](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation)
for details.
- [x] Build (`npm run build`) was run locally and any changes were
pushed
- [x] Lint (`npm run lint`) has passed locally and any fixes were made
for failures
## Pull request type
Please check the type of change your PR introduces:
- [x] Bugfix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Code style update (formatting, renaming)
- [ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
- [ ] Build related changes
- [ ] Documentation content changes
- [ ] Other (please describe):
## What is the current behavior?
End slots are lacking margin of 2px when in RTL.
Issue URL: Part of #17012
## What is the new behavior?
- Simplifying `property-horizontal` by removing any margin unset
End slots with buttons will have a margin-end of 2px regardless of
direction.
### Screenshots
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Other information
- Continuation of ionic-team/ionic-framework#27024 in order to apply it
to Framework v7
---------
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
resolves#26828
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `detail` payload for the `ionInput` event now on `ion-searchbar` contains an object with the current `value` as well as the native event that triggered `ionInput`.
The Ionic Framework team would like to re-evaluate our approach to improving customization options when building mobile applications. We are looking at other solutions that a) make customizing an app UI easier and b) are applicable to a broader set of developers.
