Issue number: resolves#24260
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
When replacing a route (`router.push(newRoute, 'none', 'replace')`) the
`RouterDirection` from the route being replaced is being used (if it
exists) instead of the new one the user specifies.
## What is the new behavior?
User-specified `RouteDirection` is used, if it exists. If it doesn't it
falls back to the `RouteDirection` of the route being replaced.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
Please see the following comment for why I think the current behavior is
incorrect, and why this change is needed:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24260#issuecomment-1078960780
---------
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#28673
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When reviewing https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28671
I noticed a bug where the custom animation was not used when going back
after a replace.
`handleNavigate` will override whatever is in `incomingRouteParams`.
Since we were passing `routeAnimation` (which is `undefined`), it was
overriding the animation we set in `handleNavigateBack`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `routeAnimation` is no longer overridden
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.1-dev.11702048520.13c82dad`
Issue number: Resolves#26524
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## Definitions
**Parameterized routes**: A route that includes one or more variables in
the path segments, such as `/form/:index`.
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When an application routes from a parameterized route, to an
intermediary route, to the same parameterized route, but with a
different value/url, Ionic's routing logic is incorrectly reusing the
view item from the first instance of the parameterized route instead of
calculating that the matched path is different. This results in the
wrong view item being recycled and rendered.
Another way of representing it:
- User navigates to `/form/0` which resolves `FormPage`
- User enters `0` into the form and submits the form
- User navigates to `/link`, which resolves `LinkPage`
- User navigates to `/form/1`, which resolves `FormPage`
- However, instead of creating a new instance of `FormPage` it is
reusing the instance of `FormPage` from `/form/0` which includes the
form having `0` in the input.
- The user now sees a "new view", but with cached data in the form.
This is not expected or desired.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ionic's routing logic will validate if the entering view item matches
the match route data before reusing it. This results in new instances of
the view item being constructed when using parameterized routes.
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/13732623/e7e3d03f-2848-4429-9f60-9074d0761e45
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `7.5.8-dev.11701383555.17254408`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
This is part of my work for hack day, but I wanted to tackle the
following problems:
1. There is no easy way to have angular, angular-server, vue,
vue-router, react, and react-router automatically recompile when you
make a change. Right now you have to manually run `npm run build` every
time you make a change.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds `npm run build.watch` to let developers easily watch for changes
in each project.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The vue, vue-router, react, and react-router packages are bundled with a
version of rollup that are 2 major versions out of date.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Update deps to rollup 4 and made any necessary changes as a result of
breaking changes
- Removed the react projects old treeshaking script. The rollup dep used
was incompatible with Rollup 4, and the script didn't work to begin
with.
- Removed the source maps and resolve plugins. These did not make any
difference in the final result, and source maps are still included in
the final build.
- Removed a PURE annotation from an import. Rollup 4 warns about this,
and this PURE annotation does not seem to be needed since every import
in this file uses "createReactComponent" to begin with.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Rollup has a plugin to handle TypeScript compilation that we are not
using. As a result, we are maintaining unnecessary infrastructure such
as compiling to `dist-transpiled`(TS to JS) and then compiling the
results to `dist` (JS files to bundled code).
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Vue, Vue Router, React, and React Router now make use of the Rollup
Typescript plugin to handle TypeScript compilation for us. This lets us
remove the `dist-transpiled` directory altogether and the manual `tsc`
invocation.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Developers should not see any changes in how they consume Ionic. This
just hands the TypeScript compilation step off to the Rollup plugin.
Dev build: `7.5.3-dev.11698859252.15ac163e`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
These scripts are old and do not do anything (`np` isn't even a
dependency).
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the scripts from react and react-router
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
CI is failing for Cypress apps due to
https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress/issues/27804#issuecomment-1721476731.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- All Cypress test apps have been updated to Cypress 13.2.0 which is not
affected by this issue.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
