Issue number: resolves#20053
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
There are a few methods that that are missing for the menu in the
Angular packages. This leads to users to not being able to use methods
like `isAnimating()`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The missing methods have been added by implementing `MenuControllerI`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: 7.5.8-dev.11701461830.1be851fd
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common loading provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common alert provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common picker provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `GestureController` provider does not use the correct underlying
instance of the utilities from either the lazy or custom elements build,
depending on if the developer is using `@ionic/angular` or
`@ionic/angular/standalone`. It will always use the lazy instance.
This applied to the `createGesture` function.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `GestureController` uses the instance of the utilities based on it's
implementation type, e.g. `@ionic/angular/standalone` uses the custom
elements build with the utilities from `@ionic/core/components`.
- `@ionic/angular` and `@ionic/angular/standalone` now export their own
specific implementation of `GestureController`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `AnimationController` does not use the correct underlying instance
of the utilities from either the lazy or custom elements build,
depending on if the developer is using `@ionic/angular` or
`@ionic/angular/standalone`. It will always use the lazy instance.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `AnimationController` uses the instance of the utilities based on it's
implementation type, e.g. `@ionic/angular/standalone` uses the custom
elements build with the utilities from `@ionic/core/components`.
- `@ionic/angular` and `@ionic/angular/standalone` now export their own
specific implementation of `AnimationController`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
Ionic was re-exporting the `AnimationController` from both
`@ionic/angular` and `@ionic/angular/standalone` entry points.
Developers will not need to update their implementations or change
import paths to take advantage of this change.
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
- Removed the common toast provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Other information
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common modal provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
We already have test coverage for the modalController, so I did not add
new ones
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in src and
standalone. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common popover provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
I didn't add tests because there's already existing ones for popover
controller.
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common action sheet provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: #19539
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When an app uses Capacitor, then the platform subscriptions will run
outside of the Angular Zone.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The platform subscriptions will run inside of the Angular Zone
regardless if it uses Capacitor or not.
Added an extra `zone.run` within the event listener.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `npm install @ionic/angular@7.5.2-dev.11698187124.1b7ea660`
Issue number: resolves#28337
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Duplicate instances of `menuController` are being created in
`@ionic/angular`. `ion-menu` registers itself in the `menuController`
from `@ionic/core`, but the `MenuController` from `@ionic/angular` uses
the `menuController` from `@ionic/core/components`. This is how the
overlay providers work too. Normally, this is not a problem. However,
`menuController` caches references to registered menus in each
controller instances:
dcbf45101f/core/src/utils/menu-controller/index.ts (L14)
This means that since there are two different controllers,
`menuController` B does not know about the menus in `menuController` A.
The end result is that the menu controller used in developer
applications did not have references to the registered menus, which gave
the impression that the menu controller did not work.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updated the architecture of `MenuController` in Ionic Angular to
accept a `menuController` instance. This allows `@ionic/angular` to pass
the `menuController` from `@ionic/core` and for
`@ionic/angular/standalone` to pass the `menuController` from
`@ionic/core/components`.
Note: Overlay controllers don't **need** this change per-se since they
don't cache references to overlays internally (they just query the DOM).
However, I think it would be good to have a consistent architecture
here, so I'll put up a separate PR that makes this change for overlays
too.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
Dev build: `7.5.1-dev.11697123035.1ee6b4a2`
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
Resolves feedback identified here:
baa37ef1e3 (r1356414362)
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The lifecycle interfaces are not exported from
`@ionic/angular/standalone`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Lifecycle interfaces are exported from `@ionic/angular/standalone`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
**1. Bundle Size Reductions**
All Ionic UI components and Ionicons are added to the final bundle of an
Ionic Angular application. This is because all components and icons are
lazily loaded as needed. This prevents the compiler from properly tree
shaking applications. This does not cause all components and icons to be
loaded on application start, but it does increase the size of the final
app output that all users need to download.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionicons/issues/910https://github.com/ionic-team/ionicons/issues/536https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27280https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24352
**2. Standalone Component Support**
Standalone Components are a stable API as of Angular 15. The Ionic
starter apps on the CLI have NgModule and Standalone options, but all of
the Ionic components are still lazily/dynamically loaded using
`IonicModule`. Standalone components in Ionic also enable support for
new Angular features such as bundling with ESBuild instead of Webpack.
ESBuild does not work in Ionic Angular right now because components
cannot be statically analyzed since they are dynamically imported.
We added preliminary support for standalone components in Ionic v6.3.0.
This enabled developers to use their own custom standalone components
when routing with `ion-router-outlet`. However, we did not ship
standalone components for Ionic's UI components.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/25404https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27251https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27387
**3. Faster Component Load Times**
Since Ionic Angular components are lazily loaded, they also need to be
hydrated. However, this hydration does not happen immediately which
prevents components from being usable for multiple frames.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24352https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/26474
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ionic components and directives are accessible as Angular standalone
components/directives
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Associated documentation branch:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/tree/feature-7.5
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <maria@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
