Issue number: resolves#28417
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The common `IonRouterOutlet` was trying to inject another common
`IonRouterOutlet` into `parentOutlet`:
dc94ae01fe/packages/angular/common/src/directives/navigation/router-outlet.ts (L119)
None existed, so this field was `null`.
This is a problem if developers are using the module `IonRouterOutlet`
since parent router outlets will not be currently injected because
Angular is trying to use the common `IonRouterOutlet` not the module
`IonRouterOutlet`:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/packages/angular/src/directives/navigation/ion-router-outlet.ts.
The same goes for the standalone `IonRouterOutlet`.
This resulted in things such as `NavController.pop` not working in
nested outlets because the parentOutlet was not defined.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `IonRouterOutlet` now injects the correct router outlet instance for
`parentOutlet`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.3-dev.11698328998.1a79f815`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
**1. Bundle Size Reductions**
All Ionic UI components and Ionicons are added to the final bundle of an
Ionic Angular application. This is because all components and icons are
lazily loaded as needed. This prevents the compiler from properly tree
shaking applications. This does not cause all components and icons to be
loaded on application start, but it does increase the size of the final
app output that all users need to download.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionicons/issues/910https://github.com/ionic-team/ionicons/issues/536https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27280https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24352
**2. Standalone Component Support**
Standalone Components are a stable API as of Angular 15. The Ionic
starter apps on the CLI have NgModule and Standalone options, but all of
the Ionic components are still lazily/dynamically loaded using
`IonicModule`. Standalone components in Ionic also enable support for
new Angular features such as bundling with ESBuild instead of Webpack.
ESBuild does not work in Ionic Angular right now because components
cannot be statically analyzed since they are dynamically imported.
We added preliminary support for standalone components in Ionic v6.3.0.
This enabled developers to use their own custom standalone components
when routing with `ion-router-outlet`. However, we did not ship
standalone components for Ionic's UI components.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/25404https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27251https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27387
**3. Faster Component Load Times**
Since Ionic Angular components are lazily loaded, they also need to be
hydrated. However, this hydration does not happen immediately which
prevents components from being usable for multiple frames.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24352https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/26474
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ionic components and directives are accessible as Angular standalone
components/directives
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Associated documentation branch:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/tree/feature-7.5
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <maria@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#17499
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Currently, there isn't a way to position toasts such that they don't
overlap navigation elements such as headers, footers, and FABs.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
Added the new `positionAnchor` property, which specifies an element that
the toast's position should be anchored to.
While the name can be tweaked, we should take care to keep the relation
between it and the `position` property clear. The `position` acts as a
sort of "origin" point, and the toast is moved from there to sit near
the chosen anchor element. This is important because it helps clarify
why the toast sits above the anchor for `position="bottom"` and vice
versa.
I chose not to rename the `position` prop itself to avoid breaking
changes.
Docs PR: https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/pull/3158
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Resolves#23480
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Angular's min/max validators do not work with `ion-input[type=number]`.
Using the built-in validators with `ion-input` will not update the
control status to invalid, reflect the `ng-invalid` class or report the
correct errors.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The `IonicModule` now includes two additional directive declarations
that extend Angular's built-in min/max validators and target the
`ion-input` component when using `type="number"`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Resolves#27212
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
`ionTabsWillChange` emits _after_ the tab view is activated in the
stack.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `ionTabsWillChange` emits _before_ the tab view is activated in the
stack.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `7.2.4-dev.11692040948.1fd0ecd2`
Issue number: Resolves#27476
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Ionic Angular application on Angular v16 cannot use the
[`bindToComponentInputs`](https://angular.io/api/router/ExtraOptions#bindToComponentInputs)
feature to assign route parameters, query parameters, route data and
route resolve data to component inputs.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ionic Angular developers can use the option on `RouterModule.forRoot`
to enable the Angular feature for binding the route snapshot data to the
component inputs.
**Modules**
```ts
@NgModule({
imports: [
RouterModule.forRoot([/* your routes */], {
bindToComponentInputs: true // <-- enable this feature
})
]
})
export class AppModule { }
```
**Standalone**
```ts
import { withComponentInputBinding } from '@angular/router';
bootstrapApplication(App, {
providers: [
provideRouter(routes,
//... other features
withComponentInputBinding() // <-- enable this feature
)
],
});
```
With this feature enabled, developers can bind route parameters, query
parameters, route data and the returned value from a resolver to input
bindings on their component.
For example, with a route configuration of:
```ts
RouterModule.forChild([
{
path: ':id',
data: {
title: 'Hello world'
},
resolve: {
name: () => 'Resolved name'
},
loadComponent: () => import('./example-component/example.component').then(c => c.ExampleComponent)
}
])
```
and a component configuration of:
```ts
@Component({ })
export class ExampleComponent {
@Input() id?: string;
@Input() title?: string;
@Input() name?: string;
@Input() query?: string;
}
```
Navigating to the component with a url of: `/2?query=searchphrase`
The following would occur:
- `id` would return `2`
- `title` would return `Hello world`
- `name` would return `Resolved name`
- `query` would return `searchphrase`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
This PR will need to be targeted to a minor release once a design doc is
approved by the team.
Dev-build: `7.1.3-dev.11689276547.129acb40`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `angular` directory sits at the root of the project instead of in
`packages` with all the other JS Framework integrations. This does not
cause any functional issues with Ionic, but it is confusing since
integrations are not in a consistent place.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Moves the `angular` directory to `packages/angular`
Note: Most files should remain unchanged. The only files I changed are
the files that had direct paths to the old `angular` directory:
1. Removes the `angular` path in `lerna.json`. This is now covered by
`packages/*`
2. Updated the angular file path in `.gitignore`
3. Updates the path to the angular package in `stencil.config.ts` for
the Angular Output Targets
4. Updates some of Angular's sync scripts to correctly get the core
stylesheets as well as the core package.
5. Updates the test app sync script to correctly sync core and
angular-server
~I'm not entirely sure why GitHub thinks
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/27719/files#diff-f5bba7e7c7c75426e2b9c89868310cb03890493b4efe0252adf8d12cc8398962
is a new file since it exists in `main` here:
1f06be4a31/angular/test/base/scripts/build-ionic.sh~
Fixed in
6e7fc49827
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.1.2-dev.11688052109.13454f5c`
