Issue number: Resolves#26391
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When updating the `value` programmatically on an `ion-datetime` after it
has already been created:
- With grid style: The selected date visually updates, but the calendar
does not scroll to the newly selected month.
- With wheel style: The selected date does not visually update, i.e. the
wheels do not move to show the newly selected date.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Grid style datetimes now scroll to the selected date using the same
animation as when clicking the next/prev month buttons.
- This animation mirrors the behavior in both MUI and native iOS. See
the [design
doc](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework-design-documents/blob/main/projects/ionic-framework/components/datetime/0003-datetime-async-value.md)
for more information and screen recordings.
- The animation will not occur if the month/year did not change, or when
the datetime is hidden.
- Wheel style datetimes now visually update to the selected date. No
animation occurs, also mirroring native.
- The `parseDate` util has also had its type signatures updated to
account for returning `undefined` when the date string is improperly
formatted. This was missed when the util was refactored to support
multiple date selection.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
- Docs PR: https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/pull/3053
- While this can technically be considered a bug fix, we are merging it
into a feature branch for safety; it's a fairly significant change to
how datetime behaves, and may interfere with custom logic when updating
a datetime's value async.
- Jumping to the newly selected value is handled by replacing everything
[here](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/27806/files#diff-4a407530c60e3cf72bcc11acdd21c4803a94bf47ea81b99e757db1c93d2735b8L364-L407)
with `processValue()`. This covers both wheel and grid datetimes.
- `activePartsClone` as a whole was also removed. It was added in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/24244 to enable
changing `activeParts` without triggering a rerender (and thus jumping
to the new value) but since we now want to do that jump, the clone is no
longer needed.
- The animation code might be tricky to follow, so I recorded going
through it:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/90629384/1afa5762-f493-441a-b662-f0429f2d86a7
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
`ion-datetime` has a state variable `isPresented`, which is never set
and goes unused except to add a CSS class (also unused).
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
State variable and class removed.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#27913
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When determining what the changed month is, we grab the element at the
center of the datetime and then grab the nearest calendar month. This
works fine if the datetime is fully in view, but if the center point is
out of the viewport then this will return `null`. As a result, scrolling
in the datetime will break.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- We now check scroll position instead of querying for DOM elements at
coordinates. This allows the view to continue to update even if the
entire calendar body is outside the viewport.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.2.2-dev.11690996559.1019674a`
Issue number: resolves#27797
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Datetime Button passes a parsed value to one of the many text formatting
utilities we have, such as `getMonthAndYear`. However, developers can
pass partial date values such as `2022` or `2022-04` (April 2022).
According to
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Date#date_time_string_format,
these are still valid date strings.
However, the `parseDate` utility does not add fallback values. So
passing `2022` will cause the `day` and `month` fields to be
`undefined`. This means that `getNormalizedDate` passes `'//2022'` to
the `Date` constructor.
Some browsers, such as Chrome, will automatically account for the stray
slashes and still return a valid date. Other browsers, such as Safari,
do not do this and will either return "Invalid Date" or throw an error.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Date normalizing utility now has fallback values so we always pass in
a valid date. In the example above, `getNormalizedDate` will now pass
`'1/1/2022'` instead of `'//2022'` to the `Date` constructor.
- Refactored other utils that use `new Date` to make use of
`getNormalizedDate` since they are also impacted.
Note: I added an E2E test instead of a spec test because I want to test
cross-browser behavior to ensure consistency.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#26596
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
There is no way to customize the month/year toggle button using CSS.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds a Shadow Part to the month/year toggle button.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `ion-header` and `ion-footer` use a base64 encoded image for a box
shadow instead of using the CSS box-shadow property directly. The use of
the background image creates CSP violations. The historic reasoning of
using an image instead of box shadow was to improve scroll performance.
Browsers and devices have improved a lot since that was implemented (5
years ago).
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates the usage of `ion-header` and `ion-footer` to use a box
shadow. The value comes from Material's web implementation:
https://material-components.github.io/material-components-web-catalog/#/component/top-app-bar
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: resolves#25945
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Datetime wheel pickers cannot be styled.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
Adds styling APIs in accordance with the Wheel Pickers and Time Picker
sections of [this design
doc](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework-design-documents/blob/main/projects/ionic-framework/components/datetime/datetime-styling.md).
Shadow parts added:
- `wheel-item`
- `wheel-item active`
- `time-button`
- `time-button active`
CSS properties added:
- `--wheel-highlight-background`
- `--wheel-fade-background-rgb`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.0.7-dev.11685554390.10c2ca9b`
Docs PR: https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/pull/2982
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Sometimes the datetime picker hasn't scrolled to the correct date yet
before the screenshot is taken. (See JIRA ticket for a failing build.)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The test waits until the picker has scrolled before taking the
screenshot.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Hopefully this is all that's needed. I did a few runs and it hasn't
failed, but it's hard to know with flaky tests 🙃
resolves#27422
Co-authored-by: Jón Prüßmeier <jon-pruessmeier@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Years in the date picker are displayed in descending order.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Years in the date picker are displayed in ascending order
- This matches the native behavior
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
This is not a breaking change, but it may be unexpected and also may
cause users' visual diff tests to fail. As such, we'll target this to
7.1
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
The updated snapshots show the change
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Datetime tests use the legacy syntax
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Datetime tests use the generator syntax
**Note to reviewers:**
I recommend reviewing this commit by commit because datetime has a lot
of tests. A few commits I'd like to call out:
77d9ab0ff2
- I removed several screenshots that were not being tested anymore. It
seems the actual test was modified/removed in the past, but the
screenshot ground truths remained.
ed45c7fa05
- This test checks that the datetime can properly expand in width based
on the `cover` property. As a result, no RTL tests are needed because
the behavior does not vary across directions. I narrowed the config of
this test to only check LTR and removed extraneous screenshots.
96c08410f2
- This test only checks that the correct text content is used within the
component. As a result, I narrowed the config to only check LTR
direction and removed extraneous screenshots.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
This is the first PR to introduce the infrastructure required to add
test generators to the Ionic Framework project. This PR introduces the
file name changes necessary to support two playwright configs, so I
recommend reviewing the PR by commit:
1e5012cea1
- Created a `playwright.config-legacy.ts` file and updates
`package.json`.
- Running `npm run test.e2e` will run the generator tests, and running
`npm run test.e2e.legacy` will run the legacy tests.
4fe8de7df7
- Updates the GitHub Action scripts to run both the modern and legacy
E2E tests. I added command modifiers to avoid collisions with output
directories.
e8bcfaf926
- Updates `*.e2e.ts` files to have the legacy format name:
`*.e2e-legacy.ts`. This naming scheme is required for the two Playwright
configs to pull in the correct files. When migrating tests to
generators, team members will rename the file to remove the `-legacy`
part.
5bf196c36d
(warning: lots of files!)
- Updates the `*.e2e.ts-snapshots` directories to have the legacy format
name: `*.e2e-legacy.ts-snapshots`. The screenshot directory in
Playwright is generated based on the test file name which is why we are
updating the screenshot directory. When migrating tests to generators,
team members will rename the directory to remove the `-legacy` part.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The team decided on some new processes for adding tests. One of those
processes is that test directories should use kebab case.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates test directories to use kebab case
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
<!-- Please refer to our contributing documentation for any questions on
submitting a pull request, or let us know here if you need any help:
https://ionicframework.com/docs/building/contributing -->
<!-- Some docs updates need to be made in the `ionic-docs` repo, in a
separate PR. See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#modifying-documentation
for details. -->
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When using the dropdown month picker, the value is updated when the
month is changed, to follow native behavior. However, because only the
month is updated (the day remains the same), it's possible for the newly
chosen date to fall outside the min/max bounds of the datetime.
For example, if you have a datetime with `min="2021-01-15"
value="2021-02-01"`, then use the month picker to switch to January, the
new value will be `2021-01-01` which is earlier than the `min`.
<!-- Issues are required for both bug fixes and features. -->
Issue URL: Resolves#27027
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
When updating the `activeParts` in any scenario, the date to set is now
clamped between the max and min.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
The Ionic Framework team would like to re-evaluate our approach to improving customization options when building mobile applications. We are looking at other solutions that a) make customizing an app UI easier and b) are applicable to a broader set of developers.
