Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
We checked `git diff` to see if new screenshots were generated. If no
new screenshots were generated then we print a user-friendly message
informing the dev what happened. However, `git diff` does not account
for untracked changes (i.e. new screenshots).
As a result, this prevented new screenshots from being committed.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- To fix this we use the `-N` flag which is short for `--intent-to-add`.
This adds an entry with no content which causes the new screenshots to
show up when running `git diff`. We later add the contents of the image.
Example test run of this working:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/actions/runs/6174263712/job/16759260534
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#28137
---------
Changes according to [this
comment](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28137#issuecomment-1710283096)
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
@liamdebeasi Sorry for replacing the previous PR. I only copied the main
branch to my fork so I couldn't rebase properly. I am unfortunately not
extremely familiar with Github.
---------
Co-authored-by: Philipp Heuer <philipp@studysmarter.de>
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `--ion-safe-area-left` and `--ion-safe-area-right` variables in
`ion-menu` are being set as if they use the app's direction. It's been
determined that safe area is not logical and uses the device's
direction. The current implementation is adding padding in the wrong
sides for `ion-toolbar` and `ion-content` within a `ion-menu`.
Additionally, `ion-menu` does not use the entire screen so the safe area
only needs to be applied to the side that is touching the device screen.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Set the `--ion-safe-area-left` and `--ion-safe-area-right` variables
to the correct values based on the device's direction.
- Padding is only added to the side that is not in the safe area.
- `ion-toolbar` is adding `--ion-safe-area-left` and
`--ion-safe-area-right` based on the device's direction.
- `ion-toolbar` can now inherit the correct values from
`--ion-safe-area-left` and `--ion-safe-area-right`.
- `ion-content` can now inherit the correct values from
`--ion-safe-area-left` and `--ion-safe-area-right`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: 7.3.4-dev.11694015543.18bc484f
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When the "Update Reference Screenshot" job is run but no new screenshots
are generated, the following error is logged:
```
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
```
This is happening because there are no files to commit when running `git
commit`. Brandy noted that this was confusing since it doesn't actually
tell you why there are no files to commit.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- If there are no diffs to commit then the update screenshot script will
log a message saying that no screenshot diffs were generated.
Example:
```
⚠️ Error: No new screenshots generated ⚠️
This means that there were zero visual diffs when running screenshot tests.
Make sure you have pushed any code changes that would result in visual diffs.
```
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/actions/runs/6099399582/job/16552017414
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#25340
---------
- Exposes the following parts for a calendar day: `calendar-day`,
`today`, and `active`
- Combines the `calendar-day-highlight` element with the `calendar-day`
element so developers don't have to know to style two different elements
& we don't have to expose them as separate parts
- Improves height parity of the calendar day across browsers
- Updates the `custom` e2e test to include an example of styling days
using the newly exposed CSS parts
- Adds tests for the focus states of the calendar day
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Team isn't using the integration.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Disables the Codeflow integration on pull requests
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#28102
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When one modal is added and another modal is removed, the modal that is
removed does not account for the newly added modal when updating the
overlay context in React. As a result, the inner contents of the newly
added modal is not mounted.
We originally tried to fix this in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/24553, but the fix
was not complete. While storing the latest information in a React ref
was correct, the way we updated the ref was done in a way such that data
was still stale.
In particular, the `overlaysRef` is updated whenever `IonOverlayManager`
is re-rendered. State updates are batched, so updating the state twice
in quick succession does not necessarily result in 2 separate renders.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- We need to make sure the ref is updated synchronously before any
render so that `addOverlay` and `removeOverlay` always have access to
the latest data.
- Added a test
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.3.3-dev.11693592339.18e000af`
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#28105
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When swiping to dismiss the card modal, the status bar style is reset
too late. Since we are using 1 animation for the card modal, the dismiss
animation is played _then_ the `dismiss` method is called (which resets
the status bar style). This means the status bar style is wrong for the
duration of the dismiss animation.
This does not impact dragging to close the modal such that the status
bar changes mid-gesture or calling the `dismiss` method directly -- only
quickly swiping to dismiss.
Also one of the changes in core/src/components/modal/modal.tsx
accidentally changed the modal behavior so that the status bar is
changed _after_ the present transition finishes.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- When the card modal is swiped to dismiss the `onDismiss` callback will
also reset the status bar style.
- When the card modal is presented the status bar is set correctly as
the animation begins
| `main` | branch |
| - | - |
| <video
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/2721089/8a18419d-a7ec-4629-8632-62e2ed401912"></video>
| <video
src="https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/2721089/62ffcf00-8dbd-4e0c-83a3-5af5d463bccc"></video>
|
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.3.3-dev.11693592322.138d91e6`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
`action/setup-node@v3` shipped a "breaking" change that requires node
v18. This breaks our dev build release process.
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/actions/runs/6044495970/job/16403194005
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updates the publish action to use node v18
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Here is a successful run with these changes:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/actions/runs/6044521110
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The progress bar basic test makes use of the `ion-range` component in
the captured screenshot. This results in tight coupling when the
appearance of the range changes.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Decouples `ion-range` from the progress bar basic screenshot captures
- Splits out dynamic behavior that was used with `ion-range` to test
files that can be manually interacted with
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Radio has a test with the wrong screenshot name of toggle.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Radio has a test with the correct screenshot name.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
N/A
Issue number: resolves#22142
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Textarea always takes up the entire width of a line which prevents the
`cols` property from working correctly.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The textarea respects the `col` property value only when `autoGrow` is
`false`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.3.2-dev.11693402720.1adb3bcf`
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In addition to migrating away from `toMatchSnapshot` as found in PRs
such as https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28083, I
think it would be valuable to have a lint rule to prevent developers
from accidentally using this API in the future.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds a lint rule which errors if `toMatchSnapshot` is being used in
`*.e2e.ts` files.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
~Note: This PR's lint step will continue to fail until the remaining
`toHaveScreenshot` migration PRs have been merged. Do note merge this PR
until that has been completed.~ All set!
---------
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
- The instructions doesn't provide clear directory paths for syncing
local changes.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The instructions has clear directory paths for syncing local changes.
- Switched to the `[!NOTE]` for notes.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
N/A
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Several tests for this component are still using Playwright's old
`toMatchSnapshot` assertion. It's now recommended to use the newer
`toHaveScreenshot` assertion. This new assertion reduces the size of
each screenshot and brings anti-flake improvements such as disabling
animations by default.
We previously migrated most of our codebase to use `toHaveScreenshot`,
but it looks like we missed the tests that were written during the
development of Ionic 7 in a separate branch off `main`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrate component tests to use `toHaveScreenshot`.
Note: There should be no layout changes to any of the screenshots. The
only difference between the old and new screenshots should be image and
file size.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The Vue Router implementation [assigns data to the `routerAnimation` on
the view
item](cddefd1548/packages/vue/src/components/IonRouterOutlet.ts (L165-L170)),
but the [type does not exist on the `ViewItem`
interface](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/packages/vue-router/src/types.ts#L62-L76).
The actual routing implementation does not make use of the type, but
this is backfilling the information when we wire up the types to the
implementation.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds the missing type for `routerAnimation` to the `ViewItem`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#27200
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
A bug occurs when you click twice quickly to open an overlay with a
small timeout. In some cases, the overlay will present, dismiss,
present, then not dismiss the second time, getting stuck open. You can
reproduce manually this by grabbing the test HTML included in this PR
and putting it in a branch that doesn't include a fix.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- When an overlay with a short timeout is triggered twice quickly, it
will open-close-open-close.
- The behavior is the same for all overlay components
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Relevant links:
* https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27200
* https://ionic-cloud.atlassian.net/browse/FW-4374
* https://ionic-cloud.atlassian.net/browse/FW-4053
I'm not sure how to write an automated test for this bug due to the
short timeout required.
You can manually test the fix in [this
Stackblitz](https://stackblitz.com/edit/g1kjci?file=package.json) by
changing the Ionic version between 7.3.1 and
7.3.2-dev.11693262117.17edbf6d
---------
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
There are two problems with this test:
1. The screenshots are not capturing the correct UI. For example, the
following screenshot should capture the date and time grid picker, but
it's only capturing the year wheel picker:
8ab3476ac7/core/src/components/datetime/test/presentation/datetime.e2e.ts-snapshots/datetime-presentation-date-time-diff-ios-rtl-Mobile-Safari-linux.png
2. These screenshots are flaky. This is possibly due to how they were
written where they iterate through an array, select a value from the
`select`, and then wait a timeout for the view to change.
3. I also discovered that we'll have some visual diffs once 2024 hits.
The current value of the datetime on the wheel picker is 2022. 2023 is
shown, but 2024 is not (since we are still in 2023). Once Jan 1 2024
hits, these tests will likely start to fail with visual diffs.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Refactored these tests to use a test fixture where each presentation
is a separate test. This ensures that the tests are correct. Because
there is less interaction going on with the page (i.e. the correct
presentation is set on load), my hope is that this also reduces test
flakiness.
- Also changed the date used to be several years ago so we don't have
new years showing up in the wheel picker screenshots as time goes on.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: resolves#27190, resolves#24780
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Popovers with dynamic widths were not being positioned correctly
relative to the trigger element. This was happening because the child
component always had dimensions of 0 x 0. Ionic has logic built-in to
wait for the child components to be rendered, but this was not working
as intended for two reasons:
1. `this.usersElement` was referencing the popover element itself not
the user’s component. When calling `deepReady` on
01fc9b4511/core/src/components/popover/popover.tsx (L477)
we are waiting for the popover to be hydrated, not the child content.
The popover was already hydrated on page load, so this resolves
immediately. However, the child content that was just added to the DOM
has not yet been hydrated, so we aren’t waiting long enough.
This is happening because we return `BaseComponent `from
`attachComponent` which is a reference to the overlay:
01fc9b4511/core/src/utils/framework-delegate.ts (L133)
Other framework delegates return the actual child content:
- Core delegate with controller:
01fc9b4511/core/src/utils/framework-delegate.ts (L35)
(this is part of why the controller popover works but the inline popover
does not)
- React delegate:
01fc9b4511/packages/react/src/framework-delegate.tsx (L31)
- Vue delegate:
01fc9b4511/packages/vue/src/framework-delegate.ts (L45)
2. `attachComponent` is unable to return the correct element currently
because the child content has not been mounted yet in this scenario.
`ionMount` is emitted after `attachComponent` resolves:
01fc9b4511/core/src/components/popover/popover.tsx (L466)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `ionMount` is emitted before `attachComponent` runs
- `attachComponent` now consistently returns the child view if present
in the DOM
- Added a test
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.3.2-dev.11693321763.15a54694`
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Several tests for this component are still using Playwright's old
`toMatchSnapshot` assertion. It's now recommended to use the newer
`toHaveScreenshot` assertion. This new assertion reduces the size of
each screenshot and brings anti-flake improvements such as disabling
animations by default.
We previously migrated most of our codebase to use `toHaveScreenshot`,
but it looks like we missed the tests that were written during the
development of Ionic 7 in a separate branch off `main`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrate component tests to use `toHaveScreenshot`.
Note: There should be no layout changes to any of the screenshots. The
only difference between the old and new screenshots should be image and
file size.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Several tests for this component are still using Playwright's old
`toMatchSnapshot` assertion. It's now recommended to use the newer
`toHaveScreenshot` assertion. This new assertion reduces the size of
each screenshot and brings anti-flake improvements such as disabling
animations by default.
We previously migrated most of our codebase to use `toHaveScreenshot`,
but it looks like we missed the tests that were written during the
development of Ionic 7 in a separate branch off `main`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrate component tests to use `toHaveScreenshot`.
Note: There should be no layout changes to any of the screenshots. The
only difference between the old and new screenshots should be image and
file size.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
That particular test is flaky. When going to try and fix the flakiness,
I realized that this behavior is already tested by another test. This
test presents the `ion-picker-internal` components which are also tested
in
7c2b6aed05/core/src/components/datetime/test/custom/datetime.e2e.ts (L10).
These show the same components which have the same APIs, so this test
shouldn't even be needed.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the duplicate test
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Several tests for this component are still using Playwright's old
`toMatchSnapshot` assertion. It's now recommended to use the newer
`toHaveScreenshot` assertion. This new assertion reduces the size of
each screenshot and brings anti-flake improvements such as disabling
animations by default.
We previously migrated most of our codebase to use `toHaveScreenshot`,
but it looks like we missed the tests that were written during the
development of Ionic 7 in a separate branch off `main`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrate component tests to use `toHaveScreenshot`.
Note: There should be no layout changes to any of the screenshots. The
only difference between the old and new screenshots should be image and
file size.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Several tests for this component are still using Playwright's old
`toMatchSnapshot` assertion. It's now recommended to use the newer
`toHaveScreenshot` assertion. This new assertion reduces the size of
each screenshot and brings anti-flake improvements such as disabling
animations by default.
We previously migrated most of our codebase to use `toHaveScreenshot`,
but it looks like we missed the tests that were written during the
development of Ionic 7 in a separate branch off `main`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrate component tests to use `toHaveScreenshot`.
Note: There should be no layout changes to any of the screenshots. The
only difference between the old and new screenshots should be image and
file size.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Several tests for this component are still using Playwright's old
`toMatchSnapshot` assertion. It's now recommended to use the newer
`toHaveScreenshot` assertion. This new assertion reduces the size of
each screenshot and brings anti-flake improvements such as disabling
animations by default.
We previously migrated most of our codebase to use `toHaveScreenshot`,
but it looks like we missed the tests that were written during the
development of Ionic 7 in a separate branch off `main`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrate component tests to use `toHaveScreenshot`.
Note: There should be no layout changes to any of the screenshots. The
only difference between the old and new screenshots should be image and
file size.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Several tests for this component are still using Playwright's old
`toMatchSnapshot` assertion. It's now recommended to use the newer
`toHaveScreenshot` assertion. This new assertion reduces the size of
each screenshot and brings anti-flake improvements such as disabling
animations by default.
We previously migrated most of our codebase to use `toHaveScreenshot`,
but it looks like we missed the tests that were written during the
development of Ionic 7 in a separate branch off `main`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrate component tests to use `toHaveScreenshot`.
Note: There should be no layout changes to any of the screenshots. The
only difference between the old and new screenshots should be image and
file size.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
