Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
Adds the base architecture to add a new theme configuration to Ionic
Framework components.
- Components can now specify an additional stylesheet for the `ionic`
theme.
- Developers can specify the `theme` and `mode` independently to control
look and feel of a component.
Test infrastructure has been updated to add support for testing the
theme configuration with Playwright.
- Existing `themes` test configuration has been renamed to `palettes`
This PR is just the initial effort to decouple Ionic's architecture to
separate look and feel and allow our dev team to start introducing the
new component appearance to the UI. There will be additional changes
required to completely add support for the Ionic theme. These changes
are targeted against the `next` branch and are not expected to be used
in a production environment at this time.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
With Ionic 8 we are dropping Angular 14 and 15 support.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- This PR officially drops Angular 14 and 15 support.
Note: The work to do this was done a while ago, but this branch was
never merged into `feature-8.0`. The breaking change was already noted
in the breaking change guide, so this is not an additional breaking
change on top of what was already specified.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
BREAKING CHANGE:
- The `helper` slot has been removed. Developers should use the `helperText` property on `ion-input` and `ion-textarea`.
- The `error` slot has been removed. Developers should use the `errorText` property on `ion-input` and `ion-textarea`.
- Counter functionality has been removed including the `counter` and `counterFormatter` properties. Developers should use the properties of the same name on `ion-input` and `ion-textarea`.
- The `fill` property has been removed. Developers should use the property of the same name on `ion-input`, `ion-select`, and `ion-textarea`.
- The `shape` property has been removed. Developers should use the property of the same name on `ion-input`, `ion-select`, and `ion-textarea`.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved placing an `ion-range` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have been removed from range. For more information on migrating from the legacy range syntax, refer to the [Range documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/range#migrating-from-legacy-range-syntax).
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved placing an `ion-checkbox` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have been removed from checkbox. For more information on migrating from the legacy checkbox syntax, refer to the [Checkbox documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/checkbox#migrating-from-legacy-checkbox-syntax).
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved placing an `ion-radio` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have been removed from radio. For more information on migrating from the legacy radio syntax, refer to the [Radio documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/radio#migrating-from-legacy-radio-syntax).
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved placing an `ion-toggle` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have been removed from toggle. For more information on migrating from the legacy toggle syntax, refer to the [Toggle documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/toggle#migrating-from-legacy-toggle-syntax).
Issue number: internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
In Ionic Framework v7, we [simplified the select
syntax](https://ionic.io/blog/ionic-7-is-here#simplified-form-control-syntax)
so that it was no longer required to be placed inside of an `ion-item`.
We maintained backwards compatibility by adding a `legacy` property
which allowed it to continue to be styled properly when written in the
following way:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-label>Label</ion-label>
<ion-select></ion-select>
</ion-item>
```
While this was supported in v7, console warnings were logged to notify
developers that they needed to update this syntax for the best
accessibility experience.
## What is the new behavior?
- Removes the `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax.
Developers should follow the [migration
guide](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/select#migrating-from-legacy-select-syntax)
in the select documentation to update their apps. The new syntax
requires a `label` or `aria-label` on `ion-select`:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-select label="Label"></ion-select>
</ion-item>
```
- Removes the legacy tests under under `select/test/legacy/` and all
related screenshots
- Removes the select usage from `item/test/disabled`,
`item/test/legacy/alignment`, and `item/test/legacy/disabled` and all
related screenshots if the test was removed
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
1. Developers have had console warnings when using the legacy syntax
since the v7 release. The migration guide for the new select syntax is
outlined in the [Select
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/select#migrating-from-legacy-select-syntax).
2. This change has been documented in the Breaking Changes document with
a link to the migration guide.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved
placing an `ion-select` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`,
have been removed from select. For more information on migrating from
the legacy select syntax, refer to the [Select
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/select#migrating-from-legacy-select-syntax).
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
In Ionic Framework v7, we [simplified the input
syntax](https://ionic.io/blog/ionic-7-is-here#simplified-form-control-syntax)
so that it was no longer required to be placed inside of an `ion-item`.
We maintained backwards compatibility by adding a `legacy` property
which allowed it to continue to be styled properly when written in the
following way:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-label>Label</ion-label>
<ion-input></ion-input>
</ion-item>
```
While this was supported in v7, console warnings were logged to notify
developers that they needed to update this syntax for the best
accessibility experience.
## What is the new behavior?
- Removes the `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax.
Developers should follow the [migration
guide](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/input#migrating-from-legacy-input-syntax)
in the input documentation to update their apps. The new syntax requires
a `label` or `aria-label` on `ion-input`:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-input label="Label"></ion-input>
</ion-item>
```
- Removes the legacy tests under under `input/test/legacy/` and all
related screenshots
- Removes the input usage from `item/test/a11y`, `item/test/counter`,
`item/test/disabled`, `item/test/highlight`,
`item/test/legacy/alignment`, `item/test/legacy/disabled`,
`item/test/legacy/fill`, and `item/test/legacy/form` and all related
screenshots if the test was removed
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
1. Developers have had console warnings when using the legacy syntax
since the v7 release. The migration guide for the new input syntax is
outlined in the [Input
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/input#migrating-from-legacy-input-syntax).
2. This change has been documented in the Breaking Changes document with
a link to the migration guide.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved
placing an `ion-input` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have
been removed from input. For more information on migrating from the
legacy input syntax, refer to the [Input
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/input#migrating-from-legacy-input-syntax).
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
In Ionic Framework v7, we [simplified the textarea
syntax](https://ionic.io/blog/ionic-7-is-here#simplified-form-control-syntax)
so that it was no longer required to be placed inside of an `ion-item`.
We maintained backwards compatibility by adding a `legacy` property
which allowed it to continue to be styled properly when written in the
following way:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-label>Label</ion-label>
<ion-textarea></ion-textarea>
</ion-item>
```
While this was supported in v7, console warnings were logged to notify
developers that they needed to update this syntax for the best
accessibility experience.
## What is the new behavior?
- Removes the `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax.
Developers should follow the [migration
guide](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/textarea#migrating-from-legacy-textarea-syntax)
in the textarea documentation to update their apps. The new syntax
requires a `label` or `aria-label` on `ion-textarea`:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-textarea label="Label"></ion-textarea>
</ion-item>
```
- Removes the legacy tests under `textarea/test/legacy/` and all related
screenshots
- Removes the textarea usage in `input/test/legacy/spec`,
`item/test/disabled`, `item/test/legacy/disabled` and
`item/test/legacy/fill`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
1. Developers have had console warnings when using the legacy syntax
since the v7 release. The migration guide for the new textarea syntax is
outlined in the [Textarea
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/textarea#migrating-from-legacy-textarea-syntax).
2. This change has been documented in the Breaking Changes document with
a link to the migration guide.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved
placing an `ion-textarea` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`,
have been removed from textarea. For more information on migrating from
the legacy textarea syntax, refer to the [Textarea
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/textarea#migrating-from-legacy-textarea-syntax).
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: resolves#28534
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Page views in Ionic need to be rendered as a child of
`ion-router-outlet` in order for page transitions and swipe to go back
to function correctly. However, Angular always inserts components as
siblings of the insertion point. Previously, the insertion point was
`ion-router-outlet` (the host element). This meant that page views were
mounted as siblings of `ion-router-outlet`. We then added code to move
the component inside of `ion-router-outlet`.
This caused two issues:
1. A DOM tree mismatch during hydration (the linked issue) because
hydration is expecting the page view to be a sibling of the router
outlet, but Ionic moves the view around in the DOM.
2. A performance issue where all components effectively have
`connectedCallback` fired twice. This callback runs when the component
is added to the DOM. On initial mount, `connectedCallback` for each
component runs. Once the page view is moved, the elements are removed
from the DOM (thus causing `disconnectedCallback` to run), and then
added to the correct location in the DOM which causes
`connectedCallback` to run again.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- IonRouterOutlet now renders a `ng-container`. This appears as a
comment in the DOM inside of `ion-router-outlet`. This comment is used
as the injection point for adding new views. The new views are added as
siblings of the comment, but since the comment is inside of
`ion-router-outlet` then the views themselves are inside of
`ion-router-outlet` too.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
This doesn't cause any known breaking changes. However, the placement of
views is pretty critical to the functionality of Ionic, so I wanted to
ship this in a major release so we have a solid public testing period
before the code is considered stable.
We already have test coverage that verifies page views are mounted in
the correct order, so I did not add more tests for this.
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: 7.6.2-dev.11704390532.1202188d
Testing:
1. Clone and install dependencies for
https://github.com/bashoogzaad/ionic-ssr-test
2. Run `npm run dev:ssr`.
3. Open app in a browser. Observe that error noted in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28534#issue-1995002926
appears.
4. Install dev build.
5. Run `npm run dev:ssr`. Observe that the error noted in the original
issue does not appear.
Note: The Angular SSR package does not support Web Components. As a
result, there are other errors you will encounter. However, I still
think it's worth fixing this issue a) in the event that the Angular SSR
package adds support for Web Components and b) to get the performance
gain of not having to re-mount components.
Issue number: resolves#28716
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
All components that have per-mode stylesheets can have their mode
adjusted by setting `mode` on the component. We use the `setMode`
function to determine which mode to use on the component:
516b84475e/core/src/global/ionic-global.ts (L75)
While this works on refresher, it is missing the `virtualProp` jsdoc
comment which causes it to not have the appropriate type information. As
a result, when developers try to use a JS binding for `mode`, they will
get compilation errors.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds virtualProp for mode to refresher
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
I am considering this a bug fix instead of a feature. In non-TypeScript
environments you can set `mode` on `ion-refresher` and it does change
the mode. What's missing here is the type information associated with
it.
Dev build: `7.6.2-dev.11702914017.1ae72da5`
Issue number: resolves#24905, resolves#26840, resolves#15710
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The current picker is only displayed as an overlay which makes it
impossible to use inline with the rest of the application. Additionally,
there are several bugs and missing features. For example, it is
impossible to know when the value of the picker column has changed using
public APIs. This is valuable for updating other columns in response to
that data.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Introduces `ion-picker` as an inline wheel picker component. The
overlay picker is still available using `ion-picker-legacy`.
- The implementation of this component resolves linked bugs. It also
resolves linked features by exposing an `ionChange` event for developers
to listen for.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `7.5.8-dev.11702398696.1ab62ea9`
---------
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: Shawn Taylor <shawn@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#28385
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Overlay controllers do not register their respective overlays
components. This results in the overlay not appearing.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Each standalone overlay controller manually calls
`defineCustomElement` for their respective overlay component to ensure
the component is loaded/registered.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.6-dev.11700492285.1581ed02`
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common loading provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common alert provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common picker provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#21769
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Toast does not support swipe gestures to dismiss.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Added a `swipeGesture` property that allows users to swipe toasts
closed.
Note: This is a combination of previous PRs
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28380 and
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28402⚠️ There is a visual glitch on iOS where dragging and having the toast
animate back to its opened position causes a flicker. This is an iOS 17
regression and is being tracked in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28467. This bug has
been reported to and confirmed by Apple.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
⚠️ Give co-author credit to author in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/23124
---------
Co-authored-by: evgeniy-skakun <evgeniy-skakun@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `GestureController` provider does not use the correct underlying
instance of the utilities from either the lazy or custom elements build,
depending on if the developer is using `@ionic/angular` or
`@ionic/angular/standalone`. It will always use the lazy instance.
This applied to the `createGesture` function.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `GestureController` uses the instance of the utilities based on it's
implementation type, e.g. `@ionic/angular/standalone` uses the custom
elements build with the utilities from `@ionic/core/components`.
- `@ionic/angular` and `@ionic/angular/standalone` now export their own
specific implementation of `GestureController`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `AnimationController` does not use the correct underlying instance
of the utilities from either the lazy or custom elements build,
depending on if the developer is using `@ionic/angular` or
`@ionic/angular/standalone`. It will always use the lazy instance.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `AnimationController` uses the instance of the utilities based on it's
implementation type, e.g. `@ionic/angular/standalone` uses the custom
elements build with the utilities from `@ionic/core/components`.
- `@ionic/angular` and `@ionic/angular/standalone` now export their own
specific implementation of `AnimationController`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
Ionic was re-exporting the `AnimationController` from both
`@ionic/angular` and `@ionic/angular/standalone` entry points.
Developers will not need to update their implementations or change
import paths to take advantage of this change.
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
- Removed the common toast provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Other information
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common modal provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
We already have test coverage for the modalController, so I did not add
new ones
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in src and
standalone. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common popover provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
I didn't add tests because there's already existing ones for popover
controller.
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common action sheet provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#28431
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
My previous attempt at fixing
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28358 caused inputs
to no longer be correctly proxied to the underlying components. This was
an attempt to work around an underlying ng-packagr bug (see linked
thread for more info).
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
I decided it would be best to continue using `ProxyCmp` (since we know
that works) and find an alternative to working around the ng-packagr
bug. I spoke with the Angular team, and they recommended pulling the
provider into its own object. `forwardRef` is now required since we are
referencing the component before it is declared.
- Revert
82d6309ef1
- Moves provider to an object to avoid ng-packagr issue
- I reverted the proxy e2e tests. These are no longer needed since we
are not ejecting from the typical `ProxyCmp` usage anymore.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.3-dev.11698699090.1151d73f`
Verified that the issue is fixed with the repro provided in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28431
Also verified that this does not regress the issue described in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28358.
Issue number: Resolves#28256
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In the form integrations for Angular and Vue, the value of a range does
not update while the knob is actively being dragged, only when the knob
is released.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
The form integrations now update the range's value when the `ionInput`
event fires, rather than `ionChange`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
I wasn't sure how to add reliable automated tests for this behavior. The
difference only applies when actively dragging the knob, and we've had
issues with such gestures being flaky in the past. I did add value
displays to the test apps so the behavior can be manually tested.
Issue number: resolves#28418
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Due to
https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil-ds-output-targets/issues/397,
calling `proxyInputs` for the form controls caused an error to be logged
in developer applications.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updated to a version of the Angular output targets with a patch for
this error
- I also excluded the `utils.ts` from all `angular-component-lib`
directories from prettier since it was causing a diff. These changes are
autogenerated so we should not be linting them anyways.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.3-dev.11698340692.18daff2f`
Issue number: resolves#28417
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The common `IonRouterOutlet` was trying to inject another common
`IonRouterOutlet` into `parentOutlet`:
dc94ae01fe/packages/angular/common/src/directives/navigation/router-outlet.ts (L119)
None existed, so this field was `null`.
This is a problem if developers are using the module `IonRouterOutlet`
since parent router outlets will not be currently injected because
Angular is trying to use the common `IonRouterOutlet` not the module
`IonRouterOutlet`:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/packages/angular/src/directives/navigation/ion-router-outlet.ts.
The same goes for the standalone `IonRouterOutlet`.
This resulted in things such as `NavController.pop` not working in
nested outlets because the parentOutlet was not defined.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `IonRouterOutlet` now injects the correct router outlet instance for
`parentOutlet`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.3-dev.11698328998.1a79f815`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Prettier is configured to ignore the `proxies.ts` file in the `src`
directory only. This means it is adjusting whitespace/commas/etc on the
`proxies.ts` file in the `standalone` directory which we do not want
because we will always get diffs whenever `npm run build` is run in
`core`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updated prettier config to ignore all `proxies.ts` files in the
`angular` package
- Re-generated the proxies file
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#28358
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
28f2ec9c62
exposed a (possible) `ng-packagr` bug where the form control components
were being re-assigned, which breaks treeshaking. These components were
considered side effects and were always being pulled into the bundle.
This resulted in a higher than expected bundle size. This issue appears
to be caused by using 2 decorators **and** referring to the class in
`useExisting` (for providers). Doing just one of these does not
reproduce the issue.
The compiled output looks something like this:
```typescript
let IonToggle = IonToggle_1 = /*@__PURE__*/ class IonToggle extends ValueAccessor {
constructor(c, r, z, injector) {
super(injector, r);
this.z = z;
c.detach();
this.el = r.nativeElement;
proxyOutputs(this, this.el, ['ionChange', 'ionFocus', 'ionBlur']);
}
writeValue(value) {
this.elementRef.nativeElement.checked = this.lastValue = value;
setIonicClasses(this.elementRef);
}
handleIonChange(el) {
this.handleValueChange(el, el.checked);
}
};
/** @nocollapse */ IonToggle.ɵfac = i0.ɵɵngDeclareFactory({ minVersion: "12.0.0", version: "14.2.12", ngImport: i0, type: IonToggle, deps: [{ token: i0.ChangeDetectorRef }, { token: i0.ElementRef }, { token: i0.NgZone }, { token: i0.Injector }], target: i0.ɵɵFactoryTarget.Component });
/** @nocollapse */ IonToggle.ɵcmp = i0.ɵɵngDeclareComponent({ minVersion: "14.0.0", version: "14.2.12", type: IonToggle, isStandalone: true, selector: "ion-toggle", inputs: { checked: "checked", color: "color", disabled: "disabled", enableOnOffLabels: "enableOnOffLabels", justify: "justify", labelPlacement: "labelPlacement", legacy: "legacy", mode: "mode", name: "name", value: "value" }, host: { listeners: { "ionChange": "handleIonChange($event.target)" } }, providers: [
{
provide: NG_VALUE_ACCESSOR,
useExisting: IonToggle_1,
multi: true,
},
], usesInheritance: true, ngImport: i0, template: '<ng-content></ng-content>', isInline: true, changeDetection: i0.ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush });
IonToggle = IonToggle_1 = __decorate([
ProxyCmp({
defineCustomElementFn: defineCustomElement$1i,
inputs: TOGGLE_INPUTS,
})
], IonToggle);
```
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the `ProxyCmp` usage in favor of manually calling proxyInputs
and proxyMethods.
- Also saw that select was missing a form control test, so I added one
The compiled code now looks something like this:
```typescript
class IonToggle extends ValueAccessor {
constructor(c, r, z, injector) {
super(injector, r);
this.z = z;
defineCustomElement$1i();
proxyInputs(IonToggle, TOGGLE_INPUTS);
c.detach();
this.el = r.nativeElement;
proxyOutputs(this, this.el, ['ionChange', 'ionFocus', 'ionBlur']);
}
writeValue(value) {
this.elementRef.nativeElement.checked = this.lastValue = value;
setIonicClasses(this.elementRef);
}
handleIonChange(el) {
this.handleValueChange(el, el.checked);
}
}
/** @nocollapse */ IonToggle.ɵfac = i0.ɵɵngDeclareFactory({ minVersion: "12.0.0", version: "14.2.12", ngImport: i0, type: IonToggle, deps: [{ token: i0.ChangeDetectorRef }, { token: i0.ElementRef }, { token: i0.NgZone }, { token: i0.Injector }], target: i0.ɵɵFactoryTarget.Component });
/** @nocollapse */ IonToggle.ɵcmp = i0.ɵɵngDeclareComponent({ minVersion: "14.0.0", version: "14.2.12", type: IonToggle, isStandalone: true, selector: "ion-toggle", inputs: { checked: "checked", color: "color", disabled: "disabled", enableOnOffLabels: "enableOnOffLabels", justify: "justify", labelPlacement: "labelPlacement", legacy: "legacy", mode: "mode", name: "name", value: "value" }, host: { listeners: { "ionChange": "handleIonChange($event.target)" } }, providers: [
{
provide: NG_VALUE_ACCESSOR,
useExisting: IonToggle,
multi: true,
},
], usesInheritance: true, ngImport: i0, template: '<ng-content></ng-content>', isInline: true, changeDetection: i0.ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush });
```
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Ryan provided some context on a related Stencil bug where doing
reassignments broke treeshaking in Webpack. While the source of this bug
is not Stencil, understanding the Stencil bug helped me better
understand this issue:
https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/issues/3191https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/pull/3248https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/pull/4188 (fixes an issue
introduced in the above stencil PR)
Dev build: `7.5.1-dev.11697480817.10fa2601`
Issue number: resolves#28337
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Duplicate instances of `menuController` are being created in
`@ionic/angular`. `ion-menu` registers itself in the `menuController`
from `@ionic/core`, but the `MenuController` from `@ionic/angular` uses
the `menuController` from `@ionic/core/components`. This is how the
overlay providers work too. Normally, this is not a problem. However,
`menuController` caches references to registered menus in each
controller instances:
dcbf45101f/core/src/utils/menu-controller/index.ts (L14)
This means that since there are two different controllers,
`menuController` B does not know about the menus in `menuController` A.
The end result is that the menu controller used in developer
applications did not have references to the registered menus, which gave
the impression that the menu controller did not work.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updated the architecture of `MenuController` in Ionic Angular to
accept a `menuController` instance. This allows `@ionic/angular` to pass
the `menuController` from `@ionic/core` and for
`@ionic/angular/standalone` to pass the `menuController` from
`@ionic/core/components`.
Note: Overlay controllers don't **need** this change per-se since they
don't cache references to overlays internally (they just query the DOM).
However, I think it would be good to have a consistent architecture
here, so I'll put up a separate PR that makes this change for overlays
too.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
Dev build: `7.5.1-dev.11697123035.1ee6b4a2`
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
Resolves feedback identified here:
baa37ef1e3 (r1356414362)
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The lifecycle interfaces are not exported from
`@ionic/angular/standalone`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Lifecycle interfaces are exported from `@ionic/angular/standalone`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
**1. Bundle Size Reductions**
All Ionic UI components and Ionicons are added to the final bundle of an
Ionic Angular application. This is because all components and icons are
lazily loaded as needed. This prevents the compiler from properly tree
shaking applications. This does not cause all components and icons to be
loaded on application start, but it does increase the size of the final
app output that all users need to download.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionicons/issues/910https://github.com/ionic-team/ionicons/issues/536https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27280https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24352
**2. Standalone Component Support**
Standalone Components are a stable API as of Angular 15. The Ionic
starter apps on the CLI have NgModule and Standalone options, but all of
the Ionic components are still lazily/dynamically loaded using
`IonicModule`. Standalone components in Ionic also enable support for
new Angular features such as bundling with ESBuild instead of Webpack.
ESBuild does not work in Ionic Angular right now because components
cannot be statically analyzed since they are dynamically imported.
We added preliminary support for standalone components in Ionic v6.3.0.
This enabled developers to use their own custom standalone components
when routing with `ion-router-outlet`. However, we did not ship
standalone components for Ionic's UI components.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/25404https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27251https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27387
**3. Faster Component Load Times**
Since Ionic Angular components are lazily loaded, they also need to be
hydrated. However, this hydration does not happen immediately which
prevents components from being usable for multiple frames.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24352https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/26474
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ionic components and directives are accessible as Angular standalone
components/directives
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Associated documentation branch:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/tree/feature-7.5
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <maria@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
