Issue number: internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
The sheet and card modal can be dragged to view content. However, there
are no events that determine when drag has started or ended.
## What is the new behavior?
- Added drag events for sheet and card modal: `ionDragStart`, `ionDragMove`, `ionDragEnd`
- Added a drag interface
- Added tests
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
---------
Co-authored-by: Shane <shane@shanessite.net>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Smith <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#30448
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
When using ion-tabs with routes that share a common prefix (e.g.,
`/home`, `/home2`, `/home3`), navigating to `/home2` incorrectly
highlights the `/home` tab. This occurs because the tab matching logic
uses `pathname.startsWith(href)`, which causes `/home2` to match `/home`
since `/home2` starts with `/home`.
## What is the new behavior?
Tab selection now uses path segment matching instead of simple prefix
matching. A tab's href will only match if the pathname is an exact match
OR starts with the href followed by a / (for nested routes). This
ensures /home2 no longer incorrectly matches /home, while still allowing
/home/details to correctly match the /home tab.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Current dev build:
```
8.7.13-dev.11765486444.14025098
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Smith <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#30700
---------
## What is the current behavior?
When a sheet modal with showBackdrop=false is rendered in a child route
(nested ion-router-outlet), the parent content becomes non-interactive.
Clicks on buttons or other interactive elements in the parent component
are blocked, even though showBackdrop=false should allow background
interaction.
Two separate issues contributed to this bug:
1. **Root locking with `backdropBreakpoint`**: The `shouldLockRoot`
logic in `overlays.ts` didn't account for `backdropBreakpoint`. Modals
with `backdropBreakpoint > 0` were still locking the root with
`aria-hidden`, even though developers expect background interaction when
the modal is below the backdrop breakpoint.
2. **Child route wrapper blocking**: When a modal is in a child route,
the child route's page wrapper (`ion-page`) and its parent
`ion-router-outlet` remain in the DOM with `position: absolute` covering
the viewport. Even after the modal is moved to `ion-app` and has
`pointer-events: none`, these wrapper elements block clicks to the
parent page's content.
This issue stems from
[#30563](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/30563),
which added root-locking behavior that didn't account for modals that
allow background interaction. A partial fix in
[#30689](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/30689)
partially addressed `showBackdrop=false` and `focusTrap=false`, but
missed `backdropBreakpoint`.
## What is the new behavior?
Sheet modals with showBackdrop=false or focusTrap=false now correctly
allow interaction with parent content when the modal is in a child
route.
Improvements:
- Recalculates isSheetModal in present() to handle Angular binding
timing
- Sets pointer-events: none on the modal element and its original parent
elements when background interaction should be allowed
- Cleans up pointer-events on dismiss
- Adds regression tests
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build:
```
8.7.12-dev.11765060985.14ad27fb
```