901 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Maria Hutt
e250818b94 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into chore-sync-next-with-main 2026-03-05 12:00:19 -08:00
ionitron
1de6b7a1cb chore(): update package lock files 2026-03-04 20:45:22 +00:00
ionitron
32ab505363 v8.8.0 2026-03-04 20:43:44 +00:00
Brandy Smith
af0949f5bb Merge branch 'main' into update-from-main 2026-03-04 15:16:31 -05:00
Maria Hutt
d29ac713fa feat(modal): add drag events for sheet and card modals (#30962)
Issue number: internal

---------

## What is the current behavior?
The sheet and card modal can be dragged to view content. However, there
are no events that determine when drag has started or ended.

## What is the new behavior?
- Added drag events for sheet and card modal: `ionDragStart`, `ionDragMove`, `ionDragEnd`
- Added a drag interface
- Added tests

## Does this introduce a breaking change?

- [ ] Yes
- [x] No

---------

Co-authored-by: Shane <shane@shanessite.net>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Smith <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-03-04 14:53:50 -05:00
ionitron
abdf9ce932 chore(): update package lock files 2026-02-25 17:14:12 +00:00
ionitron
f68ce9456a v8.7.18 2026-02-25 17:12:35 +00:00
Bengt Weiße
55735df3fa feat(textarea): reflect disabled and readonly props (#30910)
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <maria.hutt@outsystems.com>
2026-02-10 16:24:39 -08:00
Brandy Smith
177a6ea134 feat(input-otp): convert to a form associated shadow component #30785 (#30884)
Issue number: internal

---------

## What is the current behavior?
Input Otp uses `scoped` encapsulation. This causes issues with CSP compatibility and is inconsistent with our goal of having all components use Shadow DOM.

## What is the new behavior?
- Converts `ion-input-otp` to `shadow` with `formAssociated: true`
- Adds shadow parts for inner elements

## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No

BREAKING CHANGE:

Input Otp has been converted to use [Shadow DOM](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Web_Components/Using_shadow_DOM).

If you were targeting the internals of `ion-input-otp` in your CSS, you will need to target the `group`, `container`, `native`, `separator` or `description` [Shadow Parts](https://ionicframework.com/docs/theming/css-shadow-parts) instead, or use the provided CSS Variables.

---------

Co-authored-by: Brandy Smith <6577830+brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-05 13:54:05 -05:00
Brandy Smith
1d36021c6f feat(textarea): convert to a form associated shadow component (#30785)
Issue number: internal

---------

## What is the current behavior?
Textarea uses `scoped` encapsulation. This causes issues with CSP compatibility and is inconsistent with our goal of having all components use Shadow DOM.

## What is the new behavior?
- Converts `ion-textarea` to `shadow` with `formAssociated: true`
- Adds shadow parts for inner elements
- Adds and updates existing e2e tests in core for textarea
- Updated Angular test app to target textarea shadowRoot and updated lazy forms test to include textarea (standalone already has these)
- Updated React & Vue test apps to target textarea shadowRoot and added validation tests
- Improves focus behavior inside of a popover so that it is no longer required to tab twice to get to the textarea in any browser

## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No

BREAKING CHANGE:

Textarea has been converted to use [Shadow DOM](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Web_Components/Using_shadow_DOM).

If you were targeting the internals of `ion-textarea` in your CSS, you will need to target the `container`, `label`, `native`, `supporting-text`, `helper-text`, `error-text`, `counter`, or `bottom` [Shadow Parts](https://ionicframework.com/docs/theming/css-shadow-parts) instead, or use the provided CSS Variables.

---------

Co-authored-by: Brandy Smith <6577830+brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-05 13:35:39 -05:00
ionitron
dd1c1e8fa3 chore(): update package lock files 2026-01-14 18:59:30 +00:00
ionitron
d7b4d0690b v8.7.17 2026-01-14 18:58:56 +00:00
ionitron
37f87b39c4 chore(): update package lock files 2025-12-31 13:20:48 -08:00
ionitron
f71f4bf454 v8.7.16 2025-12-31 13:20:48 -08:00
ShaneK
5b9a0bbc4d Merge branch 'main' into fix/merge-next-12-23 2025-12-23 12:04:38 -08:00
ionitron
4360e39a58 chore(): update package lock files 2025-12-23 18:55:54 +00:00
ionitron
622d62a3f4 v8.7.15 2025-12-23 18:55:19 +00:00
Brandy Smith
18eacab8fb Merge branch 'main' into chore/update-next-from-main 2025-12-17 13:25:59 -05:00
ionitron
b9fdfab667 chore(): update package lock files 2025-12-17 17:51:54 +00:00
ionitron
f7af5d3ca5 v8.7.14 2025-12-17 17:50:44 +00:00
Shane
03fb422bfa fix(tabs): select correct tab when routes have similar prefixes (#30863)
Issue number: resolves #30448 

---------

<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->

<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->

## What is the current behavior?

When using ion-tabs with routes that share a common prefix (e.g.,
`/home`, `/home2`, `/home3`), navigating to `/home2` incorrectly
highlights the `/home` tab. This occurs because the tab matching logic
uses `pathname.startsWith(href)`, which causes `/home2` to match `/home`
since `/home2` starts with `/home`.

## What is the new behavior?

Tab selection now uses path segment matching instead of simple prefix
matching. A tab's href will only match if the pathname is an exact match
OR starts with the href followed by a / (for nested routes). This
ensures /home2 no longer incorrectly matches /home, while still allowing
/home/details to correctly match the /home tab.

## Does this introduce a breaking change?

- [ ] Yes
- [X] No

<!--
  If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
  2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->


## Other information

<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->

Current dev build:
```
8.7.13-dev.11765486444.14025098
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Smith <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-12-17 00:11:10 +00:00
Maria Hutt
bc9f7ef10e Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into chore-sync-next-with-main 2025-12-15 16:48:27 -08:00
ionitron
6205338620 chore(): update package lock files 2025-12-13 15:52:33 +00:00
ionitron
f775815a13 v8.7.13 2025-12-13 15:51:51 +00:00
ShaneK
ab3ffceb88 chore(git): resolving merge conflict 2025-12-10 19:42:14 -08:00
ionitron
5bf6f6e825 chore(): update package lock files 2025-12-10 21:34:28 +00:00
ionitron
afa15d23d2 v8.7.12 2025-12-10 21:33:15 +00:00
Shane
b9e3cf0f5a fix(modal): allow interaction with parent content through sheet modals in child routes (#30839)
Issue number: resolves #30700

---------

## What is the current behavior?

When a sheet modal with showBackdrop=false is rendered in a child route
(nested ion-router-outlet), the parent content becomes non-interactive.
Clicks on buttons or other interactive elements in the parent component
are blocked, even though showBackdrop=false should allow background
interaction.

Two separate issues contributed to this bug:
1. **Root locking with `backdropBreakpoint`**: The `shouldLockRoot`
logic in `overlays.ts` didn't account for `backdropBreakpoint`. Modals
with `backdropBreakpoint > 0` were still locking the root with
`aria-hidden`, even though developers expect background interaction when
the modal is below the backdrop breakpoint.
2. **Child route wrapper blocking**: When a modal is in a child route,
the child route's page wrapper (`ion-page`) and its parent
`ion-router-outlet` remain in the DOM with `position: absolute` covering
the viewport. Even after the modal is moved to `ion-app` and has
`pointer-events: none`, these wrapper elements block clicks to the
parent page's content.

This issue stems from
[#30563](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/30563),
which added root-locking behavior that didn't account for modals that
allow background interaction. A partial fix in
[#30689](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/30689)
partially addressed `showBackdrop=false` and `focusTrap=false`, but
missed `backdropBreakpoint`.

## What is the new behavior?

Sheet modals with showBackdrop=false or focusTrap=false now correctly
allow interaction with parent content when the modal is in a child
route.
Improvements:
- Recalculates isSheetModal in present() to handle Angular binding
timing
- Sets pointer-events: none on the modal element and its original parent
elements when background interaction should be allowed
- Cleans up pointer-events on dismiss
- Adds regression tests

## Does this introduce a breaking change?

- [ ] Yes
- [X] No


## Other information

<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->

Dev build:
```
8.7.12-dev.11765060985.14ad27fb
```
2025-12-10 21:08:48 +00:00
Maria Hutt
b6df59a02c Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into chore-sync-next-with-main 2025-11-26 13:51:27 -08:00
Maria Hutt
595643fd14 chore(many): update lock files 2025-11-26 11:33:54 -08:00
ionitron
3249e1dce8 v8.7.11 2025-11-26 18:47:18 +00:00
Maria Hutt
608ce9a97c Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into chore-sync-next-with-main 2025-11-19 15:07:38 -08:00
Brandy Smith
d8e6756ac3 chore(): update package lock files 2025-11-19 13:07:46 -05:00
Brandy Smith
627416b9d7 v8.7.10 2025-11-19 12:59:00 -05:00
ionitron
e1293ff9f6 chore(): update package lock files 2025-11-05 17:05:03 +00:00
ionitron
32df083e87 v8.7.9 2025-11-05 17:04:11 +00:00
Shane
58d563805f fix(accordion-group): skip initial animation (#30729)
Issue number: resolves #30613

---------

<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->

<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->

## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Currently, when you load an accordion group, the initially selected
accordion animates open. This is an unexpected change caused by
upgrading Stencil to >= 4.21.0, which changed the way component
lifecycles got triggered.

## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->

With this change, we're waiting for the accordion in the accordion group
to render and telling it if the update it's going through is the initial
update or not. This allows it to decide to animate properly.

## Does this introduce a breaking change?

- [ ] Yes
- [X] No

<!--
  If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
  2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->


## Other information

<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->

Current dev build:
```
8.7.8-dev.11761840817.1bede576
```
2025-11-03 22:03:10 +00:00
ionitron
66abc05c46 chore(): update package lock files 2025-10-29 17:41:33 +00:00
ionitron
8a8eec4247 v8.7.8 2025-10-29 17:40:53 +00:00
ionitron
4a49e52b6d chore(): update package lock files 2025-10-15 19:01:26 +00:00
ionitron
7a293d768c v8.7.7 2025-10-15 19:00:38 +00:00
ionitron
ce048a507a chore(): update package lock files 2025-10-08 18:36:26 +00:00
ionitron
2156f99c2a v8.7.6 2025-10-08 18:35:35 +00:00
ShaneK
1d020ed0be merge: package-lock 2025-09-24 13:21:21 -07:00
ionitron
99d2b731f5 chore(): update package lock files 2025-09-24 19:52:26 +00:00
ionitron
515249d2c3 v8.7.5 2025-09-24 19:51:40 +00:00
Shane
a40d957ad9 fix(modal): allow sheet modals to skip focus trap (#30689)
Issue number: resolves #30684

---------

<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->

<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->

## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Recently, we [fixed some issues with aria-hidden in
modals](https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/30563),
unfortunately at this time we neglected modals that opt out of focus
trapping. As a result, a lot of modals that disable focus trapping still
have it happening and it doesn't get cleaned up properly on dismiss.

## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
We're now properly checking for and skipping focus traps on modals that
do not want them.

## Does this introduce a breaking change?

- [ ] Yes
- [X] No

<!--
  If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
  2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->


## Other information

I created regression tests for Angular in this to prevent this from
happening again. I initially tried to do this with core, but the issue
doesn't seem to reproduce with core.

<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->

Current dev build:
```
 8.7.5-dev.11758652700.103435a3
```
2025-09-24 19:29:58 +00:00
ShaneK
aeef933fbe chore: merge 8.7.4 2025-09-17 11:59:34 -07:00
ionitron
b3b02416a3 chore(): update package lock files 2025-09-17 15:56:32 +00:00
ionitron
be1f3f32f0 v8.7.4 2025-09-17 15:55:52 +00:00