Adds a new component `ion-input-otp` which provides the OTP input functionality
- Displays as an input group with multiple boxes accepting a single character
- Accepts `type` which determines whether the boxes accept numbers or text/numbers and determines the keyboard to display
- Supports changing the displayed keyboard using the `inputmode` property
- Accepts a `length` property to control the number of input boxes
- Accepts the following properties to change the design: `fill`, `shape`, `size`, `color`
- Accepts a `separators` property to show a separator between 1 or more input boxes
- Supports the `disabled`, `readonly` and invalid states
- Supports limiting the accepted input via the `pattern` property
- Emits the following events: `ionInput`, `ionChange`, `ionComplete`, `ionBlur`, `ionFocus`
- Exposes the following method: `setFocus`
---------
Co-authored-by: Brandy Smith <6577830+brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Shane <shane@shanessite.net>
## What is the new behavior?
Adds a landing page to the Angular test app to make it easier to get to
and debug standalone.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
Co-authored-by: Brandy Smith <6577830+brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Currently the standalone test app for router-link in Angular imports all
of `RouterModule` when it only needs to import `RouterLink` from
`@angular/router`
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
Now, the Angular test app will import only what it needs from router
instead of over-importing.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
This PR helps align our Angular test apps with a more real-world
implementation expectation
Issue number: internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
There are tests apps for Angular 16, 17 and 18
## What is the new behavior?
Adds a test app for Angular 19
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
---------
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <6577830+brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#20632
---------
## What is the current behavior?
When using the `routerLink` directive in Angular, it automatically adds
`tabindex="0"` to the element. This creates issues with Ionic components
that render native button or anchor elements, as they have their own
focus management. As a result, when navigating between list items with
`routerLink` using the `Tab` key, you need to press the `Tab` key twice
to move to the next item. This problem is illustrated in the following
demo:
[](https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-blfa7h?file=src%2Fapp%2Fexample.component.html)
Related Angular issue: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/28345
## What is the new behavior?
Updated our `RouterLinkDelegateDirective` to check if the element using
`routerLink` is one of the following Ionic components:
`ion-back-button`, `ion-breadcrumb`, `ion-button`, `ion-card`,
`ion-fab-button`, `ion-item`, `ion-item-option`, `ion-menu-button`,
`ion-segment-button`, or `ion-tab-button`. If so, it removes the
`tabindex` attribute from the element. This allows these Ionic
components to let the native button or anchor element handle the focus.
This solution is demonstrated in the following demo:
[](https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-blfa7h-svmguh?file=src%2Fapp%2Fexample.component.html)
> [!NOTE]
> I did not include the `ion-router-link` component in the list to
remove `tabindex` because [the router link
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/router-link) does not
recommend using it with Angular:
>> Note: this component should only be used with vanilla and Stencil
JavaScript projects. For Angular projects, use an `<a>` and `routerLink`
with the Angular router.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Other information
Dev build: `8.2.7-dev.11722448707.1e8c66e6`
Issue number: resolves#29640
---------
## What is the current behavior?
(Angular) If a list inside of a popover contains a disabled item and is
included in the following way:
```html
<ion-list>
<ion-item [button]="true">Option 1</ion-item>
<ion-item [button]="true" [disabled]="true">Option 2</ion-item>
<ion-item [button]="true">Option 3</ion-item>
</ion-list>
```
when you try to navigate using the arrow down keys, it will stop at the
disabled item instead of continuing over it.
Note that changing the item to the following will work:
```html
<ion-item [button]="true" disabled="true">Option 2</ion-item>
```
## What is the new behavior?
Reflect the `disabled` property in the item so that when items are
queried in the popover, the arrow down key skips over the disabled item.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## Other information
This can be tested in the Angular test app by following the
documentation here:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/angular/testing.md
Removing my fix in `core`, then running `npm run build` and re-syncing
the test app should reproduce the problem.
Issue number: internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Angular 18 test app was using an RC.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updated to the official release.
- Removed the `--legacy-peer-deps` that is no longer needed
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
N/A
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Angular 18 will be releases ~ May 20th. Ionic Framework does not
currently have test infrastructure to check if the RC is compatible with
Ionic Framework.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds an Angular 18 test app to the test infrastructure
- Added tech debt tickets for additional investigation and removing the
`--legacy-peer-deps` arg after v18 GA.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#28876
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When assigning `componentProps` as inputs to an Angular component, we do
`Object.assign`. When using the newer Angular Signals API for inputs the
value of an input is a function:
```js
myInput = input<string>('foo') // this is a function
```
The developer accesses the value of `myInput` in a template by doing
`myInput()` since `myInput` is a function.
If a developer passes `componentProps: { myInput: 'bar' }` then the
value of `myInput` is set to this string value, overriding the function.
As a result, calling `myInput()` results in an error because `myInput`
is a string not a function.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Angular 14.1 introduced `setInput` which lets us hand off setting
inputs to Angular. This will set input values properly even when using a
Signals-based input.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
As part of this `NavParams` has been deprecated as it is incompatible
with the `setInput` API. The old `Object.assign` worked to allow devs to
get all of the `componentProp` key value pairs via `NavParams` even if
they are not defined as `Inputs`. Using `setInput` will now throw an
error, so developers need to create an `@Input` for each parameter. This
means that `NavParams` has no purpose and can safely be retired in favor
of Angular's Input API. Not removing NavParms would make it difficult
for us to support new Angular APIs such as this Signals-based input API.
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `8.1.1-dev.11715021973.16675b67`
You will need to update the Ionic config to opt-in to the new option:
```ts
useSetInputAPI: true,
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
With Ionic 8 we are dropping Angular 14 and 15 support.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- This PR officially drops Angular 14 and 15 support.
Note: The work to do this was done a while ago, but this branch was
never merged into `feature-8.0`. The breaking change was already noted
in the breaking change guide, so this is not an additional breaking
change on top of what was already specified.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The ticket describes renaming `TextValueAccessorDirective` since
`ion-range` is not a text-based control, however I think this was an
incorrect assumption made during the original implementation.
`ion-range` is a numeric based value accessor (either as a single number
or an object accepting a numeric start/end value).
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrates the usage of `ion-range` value accessor implementation to the
`NumericValueAccessorDirective`
- Adds tests for validating the value accessor is functioning as
expected
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Several tests were still using the legacy form syntax.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrated tests in `core`, `angular`, and `vue` to use the modern form
syntax (`react` did not have form controls).
I opted not to migrate `item/test/highlight` and `item/test/counter`
because those tests are going to be removed in the future once the
deprecate item APIs are removed.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#24905, resolves#26840, resolves#15710
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The current picker is only displayed as an overlay which makes it
impossible to use inline with the rest of the application. Additionally,
there are several bugs and missing features. For example, it is
impossible to know when the value of the picker column has changed using
public APIs. This is valuable for updating other columns in response to
that data.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Introduces `ion-picker` as an inline wheel picker component. The
overlay picker is still available using `ion-picker-legacy`.
- The implementation of this component resolves linked bugs. It also
resolves linked features by exposing an `ionChange` event for developers
to listen for.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `7.5.8-dev.11702398696.1ab62ea9`
---------
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: Shawn Taylor <shawn@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common loading provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common alert provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common picker provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Our Angular E2E tests are brittle because they rely on arbitrary
`cy.wait` calls to account for asynchronous routing. This leads to flaky
tests on CI and seemingly random test failures when we make adjustments
to the Ionic Anguar routing integration (see:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28188)
Additionally, our test execution for the navigation tests is quite slow
because transitions are enabled. As a result, we need to wait hundreds
of ms per test just for the transitions to finish.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updated the `testStack` command to use a new `getStack` [Cypress
query](https://docs.cypress.io/api/cypress-api/custom-queries). These
queries come with automatic retrying built-in. By leveraging this query
in the `testStack` command, we can avoid the arbitrary waits.
- Added `ionic:_testing=true` query strings to the navigation tests.
This causes Ionic to disable any transitions so the tests execute
faster.
- Removed most of the arbitrary `cy.wait` calls. I kept the swipe to go
back `cy.wait` -- I wasn't quite sure how to reduce flakiness on that
one.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
There is no Angular v17 test app.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
There is an Angular v17 test app.
New overrides:
- angular.json: `browserTarget` was changed to `buildTarget` and to
replace `@nguniversal` with `@angular/ssr` and
`@angular-devkit/build-angular`
- server.ts: Replace uses of `@nguniversal` with `@angular/ssr`
New change to base:
- polyfills.ts: Import
[changed](https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#zonejs)
from `import 'zone.js/dist/zone';` (this change is supported for all
versions of Angular that we support, so should be changed in the base
file)
All other files were duplicated from their v16 counterparts.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common action sheet provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#28431
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
My previous attempt at fixing
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28358 caused inputs
to no longer be correctly proxied to the underlying components. This was
an attempt to work around an underlying ng-packagr bug (see linked
thread for more info).
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
I decided it would be best to continue using `ProxyCmp` (since we know
that works) and find an alternative to working around the ng-packagr
bug. I spoke with the Angular team, and they recommended pulling the
provider into its own object. `forwardRef` is now required since we are
referencing the component before it is declared.
- Revert
82d6309ef1
- Moves provider to an object to avoid ng-packagr issue
- I reverted the proxy e2e tests. These are no longer needed since we
are not ejecting from the typical `ProxyCmp` usage anymore.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.3-dev.11698699090.1151d73f`
Verified that the issue is fixed with the repro provided in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28431
Also verified that this does not regress the issue described in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28358.
Issue number: Resolves#28256
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In the form integrations for Angular and Vue, the value of a range does
not update while the knob is actively being dragged, only when the knob
is released.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
The form integrations now update the range's value when the `ionInput`
event fires, rather than `ionChange`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
I wasn't sure how to add reliable automated tests for this behavior. The
difference only applies when actively dragging the knob, and we've had
issues with such gestures being flaky in the past. I did add value
displays to the test apps so the behavior can be manually tested.
Issue number: resolves#28417
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The common `IonRouterOutlet` was trying to inject another common
`IonRouterOutlet` into `parentOutlet`:
dc94ae01fe/packages/angular/common/src/directives/navigation/router-outlet.ts (L119)
None existed, so this field was `null`.
This is a problem if developers are using the module `IonRouterOutlet`
since parent router outlets will not be currently injected because
Angular is trying to use the common `IonRouterOutlet` not the module
`IonRouterOutlet`:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/packages/angular/src/directives/navigation/ion-router-outlet.ts.
The same goes for the standalone `IonRouterOutlet`.
This resulted in things such as `NavController.pop` not working in
nested outlets because the parentOutlet was not defined.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `IonRouterOutlet` now injects the correct router outlet instance for
`parentOutlet`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.3-dev.11698328998.1a79f815`
Issue number: resolves#28358
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
28f2ec9c62
exposed a (possible) `ng-packagr` bug where the form control components
were being re-assigned, which breaks treeshaking. These components were
considered side effects and were always being pulled into the bundle.
This resulted in a higher than expected bundle size. This issue appears
to be caused by using 2 decorators **and** referring to the class in
`useExisting` (for providers). Doing just one of these does not
reproduce the issue.
The compiled output looks something like this:
```typescript
let IonToggle = IonToggle_1 = /*@__PURE__*/ class IonToggle extends ValueAccessor {
constructor(c, r, z, injector) {
super(injector, r);
this.z = z;
c.detach();
this.el = r.nativeElement;
proxyOutputs(this, this.el, ['ionChange', 'ionFocus', 'ionBlur']);
}
writeValue(value) {
this.elementRef.nativeElement.checked = this.lastValue = value;
setIonicClasses(this.elementRef);
}
handleIonChange(el) {
this.handleValueChange(el, el.checked);
}
};
/** @nocollapse */ IonToggle.ɵfac = i0.ɵɵngDeclareFactory({ minVersion: "12.0.0", version: "14.2.12", ngImport: i0, type: IonToggle, deps: [{ token: i0.ChangeDetectorRef }, { token: i0.ElementRef }, { token: i0.NgZone }, { token: i0.Injector }], target: i0.ɵɵFactoryTarget.Component });
/** @nocollapse */ IonToggle.ɵcmp = i0.ɵɵngDeclareComponent({ minVersion: "14.0.0", version: "14.2.12", type: IonToggle, isStandalone: true, selector: "ion-toggle", inputs: { checked: "checked", color: "color", disabled: "disabled", enableOnOffLabels: "enableOnOffLabels", justify: "justify", labelPlacement: "labelPlacement", legacy: "legacy", mode: "mode", name: "name", value: "value" }, host: { listeners: { "ionChange": "handleIonChange($event.target)" } }, providers: [
{
provide: NG_VALUE_ACCESSOR,
useExisting: IonToggle_1,
multi: true,
},
], usesInheritance: true, ngImport: i0, template: '<ng-content></ng-content>', isInline: true, changeDetection: i0.ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush });
IonToggle = IonToggle_1 = __decorate([
ProxyCmp({
defineCustomElementFn: defineCustomElement$1i,
inputs: TOGGLE_INPUTS,
})
], IonToggle);
```
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the `ProxyCmp` usage in favor of manually calling proxyInputs
and proxyMethods.
- Also saw that select was missing a form control test, so I added one
The compiled code now looks something like this:
```typescript
class IonToggle extends ValueAccessor {
constructor(c, r, z, injector) {
super(injector, r);
this.z = z;
defineCustomElement$1i();
proxyInputs(IonToggle, TOGGLE_INPUTS);
c.detach();
this.el = r.nativeElement;
proxyOutputs(this, this.el, ['ionChange', 'ionFocus', 'ionBlur']);
}
writeValue(value) {
this.elementRef.nativeElement.checked = this.lastValue = value;
setIonicClasses(this.elementRef);
}
handleIonChange(el) {
this.handleValueChange(el, el.checked);
}
}
/** @nocollapse */ IonToggle.ɵfac = i0.ɵɵngDeclareFactory({ minVersion: "12.0.0", version: "14.2.12", ngImport: i0, type: IonToggle, deps: [{ token: i0.ChangeDetectorRef }, { token: i0.ElementRef }, { token: i0.NgZone }, { token: i0.Injector }], target: i0.ɵɵFactoryTarget.Component });
/** @nocollapse */ IonToggle.ɵcmp = i0.ɵɵngDeclareComponent({ minVersion: "14.0.0", version: "14.2.12", type: IonToggle, isStandalone: true, selector: "ion-toggle", inputs: { checked: "checked", color: "color", disabled: "disabled", enableOnOffLabels: "enableOnOffLabels", justify: "justify", labelPlacement: "labelPlacement", legacy: "legacy", mode: "mode", name: "name", value: "value" }, host: { listeners: { "ionChange": "handleIonChange($event.target)" } }, providers: [
{
provide: NG_VALUE_ACCESSOR,
useExisting: IonToggle,
multi: true,
},
], usesInheritance: true, ngImport: i0, template: '<ng-content></ng-content>', isInline: true, changeDetection: i0.ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush });
```
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Ryan provided some context on a related Stencil bug where doing
reassignments broke treeshaking in Webpack. While the source of this bug
is not Stencil, understanding the Stencil bug helped me better
understand this issue:
https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/issues/3191https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/pull/3248https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/pull/4188 (fixes an issue
introduced in the above stencil PR)
Dev build: `7.5.1-dev.11697480817.10fa2601`
Issue number: resolves#28337
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Duplicate instances of `menuController` are being created in
`@ionic/angular`. `ion-menu` registers itself in the `menuController`
from `@ionic/core`, but the `MenuController` from `@ionic/angular` uses
the `menuController` from `@ionic/core/components`. This is how the
overlay providers work too. Normally, this is not a problem. However,
`menuController` caches references to registered menus in each
controller instances:
dcbf45101f/core/src/utils/menu-controller/index.ts (L14)
This means that since there are two different controllers,
`menuController` B does not know about the menus in `menuController` A.
The end result is that the menu controller used in developer
applications did not have references to the registered menus, which gave
the impression that the menu controller did not work.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updated the architecture of `MenuController` in Ionic Angular to
accept a `menuController` instance. This allows `@ionic/angular` to pass
the `menuController` from `@ionic/core` and for
`@ionic/angular/standalone` to pass the `menuController` from
`@ionic/core/components`.
Note: Overlay controllers don't **need** this change per-se since they
don't cache references to overlays internally (they just query the DOM).
However, I think it would be good to have a consistent architecture
here, so I'll put up a separate PR that makes this change for overlays
too.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
Dev build: `7.5.1-dev.11697123035.1ee6b4a2`
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
**1. Bundle Size Reductions**
All Ionic UI components and Ionicons are added to the final bundle of an
Ionic Angular application. This is because all components and icons are
lazily loaded as needed. This prevents the compiler from properly tree
shaking applications. This does not cause all components and icons to be
loaded on application start, but it does increase the size of the final
app output that all users need to download.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionicons/issues/910https://github.com/ionic-team/ionicons/issues/536https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27280https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24352
**2. Standalone Component Support**
Standalone Components are a stable API as of Angular 15. The Ionic
starter apps on the CLI have NgModule and Standalone options, but all of
the Ionic components are still lazily/dynamically loaded using
`IonicModule`. Standalone components in Ionic also enable support for
new Angular features such as bundling with ESBuild instead of Webpack.
ESBuild does not work in Ionic Angular right now because components
cannot be statically analyzed since they are dynamically imported.
We added preliminary support for standalone components in Ionic v6.3.0.
This enabled developers to use their own custom standalone components
when routing with `ion-router-outlet`. However, we did not ship
standalone components for Ionic's UI components.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/25404https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27251https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27387
**3. Faster Component Load Times**
Since Ionic Angular components are lazily loaded, they also need to be
hydrated. However, this hydration does not happen immediately which
prevents components from being usable for multiple frames.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24352https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/26474
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ionic components and directives are accessible as Angular standalone
components/directives
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Associated documentation branch:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/tree/feature-7.5
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <maria@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Resolves#23480
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Angular's min/max validators do not work with `ion-input[type=number]`.
Using the built-in validators with `ion-input` will not update the
control status to invalid, reflect the `ng-invalid` class or report the
correct errors.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The `IonicModule` now includes two additional directive declarations
that extend Angular's built-in min/max validators and target the
`ion-input` component when using `type="number"`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Resolves#27476
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Ionic Angular application on Angular v16 cannot use the
[`bindToComponentInputs`](https://angular.io/api/router/ExtraOptions#bindToComponentInputs)
feature to assign route parameters, query parameters, route data and
route resolve data to component inputs.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ionic Angular developers can use the option on `RouterModule.forRoot`
to enable the Angular feature for binding the route snapshot data to the
component inputs.
**Modules**
```ts
@NgModule({
imports: [
RouterModule.forRoot([/* your routes */], {
bindToComponentInputs: true // <-- enable this feature
})
]
})
export class AppModule { }
```
**Standalone**
```ts
import { withComponentInputBinding } from '@angular/router';
bootstrapApplication(App, {
providers: [
provideRouter(routes,
//... other features
withComponentInputBinding() // <-- enable this feature
)
],
});
```
With this feature enabled, developers can bind route parameters, query
parameters, route data and the returned value from a resolver to input
bindings on their component.
For example, with a route configuration of:
```ts
RouterModule.forChild([
{
path: ':id',
data: {
title: 'Hello world'
},
resolve: {
name: () => 'Resolved name'
},
loadComponent: () => import('./example-component/example.component').then(c => c.ExampleComponent)
}
])
```
and a component configuration of:
```ts
@Component({ })
export class ExampleComponent {
@Input() id?: string;
@Input() title?: string;
@Input() name?: string;
@Input() query?: string;
}
```
Navigating to the component with a url of: `/2?query=searchphrase`
The following would occur:
- `id` would return `2`
- `title` would return `Hello world`
- `name` would return `Resolved name`
- `query` would return `searchphrase`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
This PR will need to be targeted to a minor release once a design doc is
approved by the team.
Dev-build: `7.1.3-dev.11689276547.129acb40`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `angular` directory sits at the root of the project instead of in
`packages` with all the other JS Framework integrations. This does not
cause any functional issues with Ionic, but it is confusing since
integrations are not in a consistent place.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Moves the `angular` directory to `packages/angular`
Note: Most files should remain unchanged. The only files I changed are
the files that had direct paths to the old `angular` directory:
1. Removes the `angular` path in `lerna.json`. This is now covered by
`packages/*`
2. Updated the angular file path in `.gitignore`
3. Updates the path to the angular package in `stencil.config.ts` for
the Angular Output Targets
4. Updates some of Angular's sync scripts to correctly get the core
stylesheets as well as the core package.
5. Updates the test app sync script to correctly sync core and
angular-server
~I'm not entirely sure why GitHub thinks
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/27719/files#diff-f5bba7e7c7c75426e2b9c89868310cb03890493b4efe0252adf8d12cc8398962
is a new file since it exists in `main` here:
1f06be4a31/angular/test/base/scripts/build-ionic.sh~
Fixed in
6e7fc49827
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.1.2-dev.11688052109.13454f5c`
