BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved placing an `ion-checkbox` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have been removed from checkbox. For more information on migrating from the legacy checkbox syntax, refer to the [Checkbox documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/checkbox#migrating-from-legacy-checkbox-syntax).
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
We currently export two versions of the `ion-back-button` angular
implementation: `IonBackButton` and `IonBackButtonDelegate`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removes `IonBackButtonDelegate` in favor of `IonBackButton`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
- The `IonBackButtonDelegate` class has been removed in favor of
`IonBackButton`.
```diff
- import { IonBackButtonDelegate } from '@ionic/angular';
+ import { IonBackButton } from '@ionic/angular';
```
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved placing an `ion-radio` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have been removed from radio. For more information on migrating from the legacy radio syntax, refer to the [Radio documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/radio#migrating-from-legacy-radio-syntax).
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved placing an `ion-toggle` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have been removed from toggle. For more information on migrating from the legacy toggle syntax, refer to the [Toggle documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/toggle#migrating-from-legacy-toggle-syntax).
Issue number: internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
In Ionic Framework v7, we [simplified the select
syntax](https://ionic.io/blog/ionic-7-is-here#simplified-form-control-syntax)
so that it was no longer required to be placed inside of an `ion-item`.
We maintained backwards compatibility by adding a `legacy` property
which allowed it to continue to be styled properly when written in the
following way:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-label>Label</ion-label>
<ion-select></ion-select>
</ion-item>
```
While this was supported in v7, console warnings were logged to notify
developers that they needed to update this syntax for the best
accessibility experience.
## What is the new behavior?
- Removes the `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax.
Developers should follow the [migration
guide](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/select#migrating-from-legacy-select-syntax)
in the select documentation to update their apps. The new syntax
requires a `label` or `aria-label` on `ion-select`:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-select label="Label"></ion-select>
</ion-item>
```
- Removes the legacy tests under under `select/test/legacy/` and all
related screenshots
- Removes the select usage from `item/test/disabled`,
`item/test/legacy/alignment`, and `item/test/legacy/disabled` and all
related screenshots if the test was removed
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
1. Developers have had console warnings when using the legacy syntax
since the v7 release. The migration guide for the new select syntax is
outlined in the [Select
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/select#migrating-from-legacy-select-syntax).
2. This change has been documented in the Breaking Changes document with
a link to the migration guide.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved
placing an `ion-select` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`,
have been removed from select. For more information on migrating from
the legacy select syntax, refer to the [Select
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/select#migrating-from-legacy-select-syntax).
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
In Ionic Framework v7, we [simplified the input
syntax](https://ionic.io/blog/ionic-7-is-here#simplified-form-control-syntax)
so that it was no longer required to be placed inside of an `ion-item`.
We maintained backwards compatibility by adding a `legacy` property
which allowed it to continue to be styled properly when written in the
following way:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-label>Label</ion-label>
<ion-input></ion-input>
</ion-item>
```
While this was supported in v7, console warnings were logged to notify
developers that they needed to update this syntax for the best
accessibility experience.
## What is the new behavior?
- Removes the `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax.
Developers should follow the [migration
guide](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/input#migrating-from-legacy-input-syntax)
in the input documentation to update their apps. The new syntax requires
a `label` or `aria-label` on `ion-input`:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-input label="Label"></ion-input>
</ion-item>
```
- Removes the legacy tests under under `input/test/legacy/` and all
related screenshots
- Removes the input usage from `item/test/a11y`, `item/test/counter`,
`item/test/disabled`, `item/test/highlight`,
`item/test/legacy/alignment`, `item/test/legacy/disabled`,
`item/test/legacy/fill`, and `item/test/legacy/form` and all related
screenshots if the test was removed
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
1. Developers have had console warnings when using the legacy syntax
since the v7 release. The migration guide for the new input syntax is
outlined in the [Input
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/input#migrating-from-legacy-input-syntax).
2. This change has been documented in the Breaking Changes document with
a link to the migration guide.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved
placing an `ion-input` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`, have
been removed from input. For more information on migrating from the
legacy input syntax, refer to the [Input
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/input#migrating-from-legacy-input-syntax).
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: internal
---------
## What is the current behavior?
In Ionic Framework v7, we [simplified the textarea
syntax](https://ionic.io/blog/ionic-7-is-here#simplified-form-control-syntax)
so that it was no longer required to be placed inside of an `ion-item`.
We maintained backwards compatibility by adding a `legacy` property
which allowed it to continue to be styled properly when written in the
following way:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-label>Label</ion-label>
<ion-textarea></ion-textarea>
</ion-item>
```
While this was supported in v7, console warnings were logged to notify
developers that they needed to update this syntax for the best
accessibility experience.
## What is the new behavior?
- Removes the `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax.
Developers should follow the [migration
guide](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/textarea#migrating-from-legacy-textarea-syntax)
in the textarea documentation to update their apps. The new syntax
requires a `label` or `aria-label` on `ion-textarea`:
```html
<ion-item>
<ion-textarea label="Label"></ion-textarea>
</ion-item>
```
- Removes the legacy tests under `textarea/test/legacy/` and all related
screenshots
- Removes the textarea usage in `input/test/legacy/spec`,
`item/test/disabled`, `item/test/legacy/disabled` and
`item/test/legacy/fill`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
1. Developers have had console warnings when using the legacy syntax
since the v7 release. The migration guide for the new textarea syntax is
outlined in the [Textarea
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/textarea#migrating-from-legacy-textarea-syntax).
2. This change has been documented in the Breaking Changes document with
a link to the migration guide.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `legacy` property and support for the legacy syntax, which involved
placing an `ion-textarea` inside of an `ion-item` with an `ion-label`,
have been removed from textarea. For more information on migrating from
the legacy textarea syntax, refer to the [Textarea
documentation](https://ionicframework.com/docs/api/textarea#migrating-from-legacy-textarea-syntax).
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Issue number: resolves#28838
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In #28316 we resolved a longstanding misconfiguration where event
listeners being added to the page were not removed. This was due to
incorrect usage of `.bind` creating a new instance of the callback
functions.
By removing the event listener for `ionViewDidLeave`, before the
component has actually unmounted in react, resulted in the registered
destroy callback to not fire:
51c729eafc/packages/react/src/contexts/IonLifeCycleContext.tsx (L208-L216)
and
51c729eafc/packages/react/src/routing/ViewLifeCycleManager.tsx (L21-L32)
This resulted in a scenario that using a `Redirect` could cause the
wrong view to be unmounted (the entering view) and leave the user on an
empty screen.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `ionViewDidEnter` event listener *is not* removed while the component
is unmounting. The browser will naturally remove the event listener when
the element node is detached from the DOM.
- Users are no longer presented with a white screen after clicking a
route that uses a redirect.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `7.6.7-dev.11706567011.11e782a9`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The packages, Angular, React, and Vue, will accept any `app_dir`
parameter when passing it to the build script. This can lead to a user
to entering a directory that doesn't exist within `test/apps`. If this
happens, then the build folder will include an incomplete test app.
For example:
1. `./build ng13`
2. This creates a `build/ng13` folder, but the folder only contains the
contents from the `base` folder. This causes it to be incomplete.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Provides a message that the provided app directory doesn't exist.
- Does not create the incomplete app when an invalid app directory is
given.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
4. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
5. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
N/A
Issue number: None
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
People adding a new Angular test app don't know they need to update the
Stencil nightly build.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Documentation exists for adding a new Angular version to the Stencil
nightly build when creating a new Angular test app..
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
This is related to #28945
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Several tests were still using the legacy form syntax.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrated tests in `core`, `angular`, and `vue` to use the modern form
syntax (`react` did not have form controls).
I opted not to migrate `item/test/highlight` and `item/test/counter`
because those tests are going to be removed in the future once the
deprecate item APIs are removed.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `ion-input` component currently specifies a `size` attribute to
align with the HTML `input` implementation. However, Ionic's custom
appearance for MD and iOS is not compatible and should not be used with
the `size` attribute:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27945#issuecomment-1669702274.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The `size` property has been removed from `ion-input`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
The `size` attribute has been removed from `ion-input`. As it was not
compatible before, this is likely to have a minimal impact to
developers. If your application is using the `size` attribute, replace
the usage with CSS styling to control the width of the `ion-input`.
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
React and React Router packages do not build correctly on Windows
because certain dependencies were not marked as external.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- 3rd party packages are correctly marked as external
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `IonPicker` tests in the React app were skipped due to a Stencil bug
that has since been resolved.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
Tests re-enabled.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
This script was used to aid in the test of local version of
`@ionic/angular`. However, these instructions have been replaced by the
instructions in `packages/angular/test/README.md`. This PR removes the
old script.
Issue number: resolves#28774
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
There are two issues causing Ionic Vue apps to not behave as intended
with certain versions of Vue:
1. In Vue 3.3 a [breaking change
shipped](https://github.com/vuejs/core/issues/9916) that changes the
default behavior of the `watch` inside of IonRouterOutlet to be a
shallow watcher instead of a deep watcher. This caused the router outlet
to not consistent re-render. While the change was later reverted by the
Vue team, they expressed that the change [may re-land in a future minor
release](https://github.com/vuejs/core/issues/9965#issuecomment-1875067499).
As a result, we will need to account for this inside of Ionic.
2. In Vue 3.2 a [custom elements improvement
shipped](https://github.com/vuejs/core/blob/main/changelogs/CHANGELOG-3.2.md#3238-2022-08-30)
that changed how custom elements are referred to in VNodes.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The affected `watch` call now is now explicitly a deep watcher. This
change is backwards compatible as well as forward compatible with
upcoming Vue changes.
- Updated IonTabs to account for the new VNode behavior for custom
elements. Ionic still supports version of Vue that do not have this
improvement, so we need to account for both behaviors for now. I also
added a tech debt ticket to remove the old checks when we drop support
for older versions of Vue.
- Updated E2E test dependencies. During this update some of our tests
needed to be updated to account for newer versions of Vue/Vitest.
Overall I was able to simplify a lot of our tests as a result.
I plan to add renovatebot to these E2E test apps, but I will handle that
in a separate PR.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
4. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
5. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.6-dev.11705526292.1bc0acb5`
Note: Both of the issues cause tests to fail when using the latest
dependencies in the Vue E2E test app. However, I need to use the latest
dependencies so I can demonstrate that my changes do fix the reported
issues. As a result, I have both fixes in the same PR.
Issue number: resolves#28827
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
This import was renamed to `IonBackButton` as part of
9f20780d66.
However, we did not consider that some developers are importing this to
use with `ViewChild`. While we should keep alignment with other
component imports, we need to support the old import until we can make a
breaking change in Ionic 8.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds the old IonBackButtonDelegate import
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.5-dev.11705352188.1c6cdb08`
Issue number: resolves#28534
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Page views in Ionic need to be rendered as a child of
`ion-router-outlet` in order for page transitions and swipe to go back
to function correctly. However, Angular always inserts components as
siblings of the insertion point. Previously, the insertion point was
`ion-router-outlet` (the host element). This meant that page views were
mounted as siblings of `ion-router-outlet`. We then added code to move
the component inside of `ion-router-outlet`.
This caused two issues:
1. A DOM tree mismatch during hydration (the linked issue) because
hydration is expecting the page view to be a sibling of the router
outlet, but Ionic moves the view around in the DOM.
2. A performance issue where all components effectively have
`connectedCallback` fired twice. This callback runs when the component
is added to the DOM. On initial mount, `connectedCallback` for each
component runs. Once the page view is moved, the elements are removed
from the DOM (thus causing `disconnectedCallback` to run), and then
added to the correct location in the DOM which causes
`connectedCallback` to run again.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- IonRouterOutlet now renders a `ng-container`. This appears as a
comment in the DOM inside of `ion-router-outlet`. This comment is used
as the injection point for adding new views. The new views are added as
siblings of the comment, but since the comment is inside of
`ion-router-outlet` then the views themselves are inside of
`ion-router-outlet` too.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
This doesn't cause any known breaking changes. However, the placement of
views is pretty critical to the functionality of Ionic, so I wanted to
ship this in a major release so we have a solid public testing period
before the code is considered stable.
We already have test coverage that verifies page views are mounted in
the correct order, so I did not add more tests for this.
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: 7.6.2-dev.11704390532.1202188d
Testing:
1. Clone and install dependencies for
https://github.com/bashoogzaad/ionic-ssr-test
2. Run `npm run dev:ssr`.
3. Open app in a browser. Observe that error noted in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28534#issue-1995002926
appears.
4. Install dev build.
5. Run `npm run dev:ssr`. Observe that the error noted in the original
issue does not appear.
Note: The Angular SSR package does not support Web Components. As a
result, there are other errors you will encounter. However, I still
think it's worth fixing this issue a) in the event that the Angular SSR
package adds support for Web Components and b) to get the performance
gain of not having to re-mount components.
Issue number: resolves#28716
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
All components that have per-mode stylesheets can have their mode
adjusted by setting `mode` on the component. We use the `setMode`
function to determine which mode to use on the component:
516b84475e/core/src/global/ionic-global.ts (L75)
While this works on refresher, it is missing the `virtualProp` jsdoc
comment which causes it to not have the appropriate type information. As
a result, when developers try to use a JS binding for `mode`, they will
get compilation errors.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds virtualProp for mode to refresher
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
I am considering this a bug fix instead of a feature. In non-TypeScript
environments you can set `mode` on `ion-refresher` and it does change
the mode. What's missing here is the type information associated with
it.
Dev build: `7.6.2-dev.11702914017.1ae72da5`
Issue number: resolves#24905, resolves#26840, resolves#15710
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The current picker is only displayed as an overlay which makes it
impossible to use inline with the rest of the application. Additionally,
there are several bugs and missing features. For example, it is
impossible to know when the value of the picker column has changed using
public APIs. This is valuable for updating other columns in response to
that data.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Introduces `ion-picker` as an inline wheel picker component. The
overlay picker is still available using `ion-picker-legacy`.
- The implementation of this component resolves linked bugs. It also
resolves linked features by exposing an `ionChange` event for developers
to listen for.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `7.5.8-dev.11702398696.1ab62ea9`
---------
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: Shawn Taylor <shawn@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandy Carney <brandyscarney@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Ionic React projects using `@types/react@18.2.43` or greater will run
into a type-check error on build with `IonRouterOutlet` and potentially
other components:
```
Property 'placeholder' is missing in type '{ children: Element[]; }' but required in type 'Pick<IonRouterOutlet & { basePath?: string | undefined; ref?: Ref<any> | undefined; ionPage?: boolean | undefined; } & IonicReactProps & Omit<...>, "color" | ... 254 more ... | "ionPage">'.
```
Definitely typed decided to make a breaking type change in a patch
release:
b954269038
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Patches the type to allow for compatibility between React v16, 17 and
18.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
### Testing
1. Create a new Ionic react project with the "list" template.
2. Run `npm run build`
3. Observe: Exception posted above
4. Install the dev-build
5. Run `npm run build`
6. Observe: No exception, build passes
7. You can additionally serve the app to verify no runtime
exceptions/broken behavior.
Dev-build: `7.6.1-dev.11702322681.17e39348`
Issue number: resolves#24260
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
When replacing a route (`router.push(newRoute, 'none', 'replace')`) the
`RouterDirection` from the route being replaced is being used (if it
exists) instead of the new one the user specifies.
## What is the new behavior?
User-specified `RouteDirection` is used, if it exists. If it doesn't it
falls back to the `RouteDirection` of the route being replaced.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
Please see the following comment for why I think the current behavior is
incorrect, and why this change is needed:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24260#issuecomment-1078960780
---------
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#28673
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When reviewing https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28671
I noticed a bug where the custom animation was not used when going back
after a replace.
`handleNavigate` will override whatever is in `incomingRouteParams`.
Since we were passing `routeAnimation` (which is `undefined`), it was
overriding the animation we set in `handleNavigateBack`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `routeAnimation` is no longer overridden
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.1-dev.11702048520.13c82dad`
