Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The packages, Angular, React, and Vue, will accept any `app_dir`
parameter when passing it to the build script. This can lead to a user
to entering a directory that doesn't exist within `test/apps`. If this
happens, then the build folder will include an incomplete test app.
For example:
1. `./build ng13`
2. This creates a `build/ng13` folder, but the folder only contains the
contents from the `base` folder. This causes it to be incomplete.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Provides a message that the provided app directory doesn't exist.
- Does not create the incomplete app when an invalid app directory is
given.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
4. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
5. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
N/A
Issue number: None
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
People adding a new Angular test app don't know they need to update the
Stencil nightly build.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Documentation exists for adding a new Angular version to the Stencil
nightly build when creating a new Angular test app..
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
This is related to #28945
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Several tests were still using the legacy form syntax.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrated tests in `core`, `angular`, and `vue` to use the modern form
syntax (`react` did not have form controls).
I opted not to migrate `item/test/highlight` and `item/test/counter`
because those tests are going to be removed in the future once the
deprecate item APIs are removed.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common loading provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common alert provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common picker provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Our Angular E2E tests are brittle because they rely on arbitrary
`cy.wait` calls to account for asynchronous routing. This leads to flaky
tests on CI and seemingly random test failures when we make adjustments
to the Ionic Anguar routing integration (see:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28188)
Additionally, our test execution for the navigation tests is quite slow
because transitions are enabled. As a result, we need to wait hundreds
of ms per test just for the transitions to finish.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updated the `testStack` command to use a new `getStack` [Cypress
query](https://docs.cypress.io/api/cypress-api/custom-queries). These
queries come with automatic retrying built-in. By leveraging this query
in the `testStack` command, we can avoid the arbitrary waits.
- Added `ionic:_testing=true` query strings to the navigation tests.
This causes Ionic to disable any transitions so the tests execute
faster.
- Removed most of the arbitrary `cy.wait` calls. I kept the swipe to go
back `cy.wait` -- I wasn't quite sure how to reduce flakiness on that
one.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
There is no Angular v17 test app.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
There is an Angular v17 test app.
New overrides:
- angular.json: `browserTarget` was changed to `buildTarget` and to
replace `@nguniversal` with `@angular/ssr` and
`@angular-devkit/build-angular`
- server.ts: Replace uses of `@nguniversal` with `@angular/ssr`
New change to base:
- polyfills.ts: Import
[changed](https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#zonejs)
from `import 'zone.js/dist/zone';` (this change is supported for all
versions of Angular that we support, so should be changed in the base
file)
All other files were duplicated from their v16 counterparts.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common action sheet provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: resolves#28431
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
My previous attempt at fixing
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28358 caused inputs
to no longer be correctly proxied to the underlying components. This was
an attempt to work around an underlying ng-packagr bug (see linked
thread for more info).
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
I decided it would be best to continue using `ProxyCmp` (since we know
that works) and find an alternative to working around the ng-packagr
bug. I spoke with the Angular team, and they recommended pulling the
provider into its own object. `forwardRef` is now required since we are
referencing the component before it is declared.
- Revert
82d6309ef1
- Moves provider to an object to avoid ng-packagr issue
- I reverted the proxy e2e tests. These are no longer needed since we
are not ejecting from the typical `ProxyCmp` usage anymore.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.3-dev.11698699090.1151d73f`
Verified that the issue is fixed with the repro provided in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28431
Also verified that this does not regress the issue described in
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/28358.
Issue number: Resolves#28256
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In the form integrations for Angular and Vue, the value of a range does
not update while the knob is actively being dragged, only when the knob
is released.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
The form integrations now update the range's value when the `ionInput`
event fires, rather than `ionChange`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
I wasn't sure how to add reliable automated tests for this behavior. The
difference only applies when actively dragging the knob, and we've had
issues with such gestures being flaky in the past. I did add value
displays to the test apps so the behavior can be manually tested.
Issue number: resolves#28417
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The common `IonRouterOutlet` was trying to inject another common
`IonRouterOutlet` into `parentOutlet`:
dc94ae01fe/packages/angular/common/src/directives/navigation/router-outlet.ts (L119)
None existed, so this field was `null`.
This is a problem if developers are using the module `IonRouterOutlet`
since parent router outlets will not be currently injected because
Angular is trying to use the common `IonRouterOutlet` not the module
`IonRouterOutlet`:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/packages/angular/src/directives/navigation/ion-router-outlet.ts.
The same goes for the standalone `IonRouterOutlet`.
This resulted in things such as `NavController.pop` not working in
nested outlets because the parentOutlet was not defined.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `IonRouterOutlet` now injects the correct router outlet instance for
`parentOutlet`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.3-dev.11698328998.1a79f815`
Issue number: resolves#28358
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
28f2ec9c62
exposed a (possible) `ng-packagr` bug where the form control components
were being re-assigned, which breaks treeshaking. These components were
considered side effects and were always being pulled into the bundle.
This resulted in a higher than expected bundle size. This issue appears
to be caused by using 2 decorators **and** referring to the class in
`useExisting` (for providers). Doing just one of these does not
reproduce the issue.
The compiled output looks something like this:
```typescript
let IonToggle = IonToggle_1 = /*@__PURE__*/ class IonToggle extends ValueAccessor {
constructor(c, r, z, injector) {
super(injector, r);
this.z = z;
c.detach();
this.el = r.nativeElement;
proxyOutputs(this, this.el, ['ionChange', 'ionFocus', 'ionBlur']);
}
writeValue(value) {
this.elementRef.nativeElement.checked = this.lastValue = value;
setIonicClasses(this.elementRef);
}
handleIonChange(el) {
this.handleValueChange(el, el.checked);
}
};
/** @nocollapse */ IonToggle.ɵfac = i0.ɵɵngDeclareFactory({ minVersion: "12.0.0", version: "14.2.12", ngImport: i0, type: IonToggle, deps: [{ token: i0.ChangeDetectorRef }, { token: i0.ElementRef }, { token: i0.NgZone }, { token: i0.Injector }], target: i0.ɵɵFactoryTarget.Component });
/** @nocollapse */ IonToggle.ɵcmp = i0.ɵɵngDeclareComponent({ minVersion: "14.0.0", version: "14.2.12", type: IonToggle, isStandalone: true, selector: "ion-toggle", inputs: { checked: "checked", color: "color", disabled: "disabled", enableOnOffLabels: "enableOnOffLabels", justify: "justify", labelPlacement: "labelPlacement", legacy: "legacy", mode: "mode", name: "name", value: "value" }, host: { listeners: { "ionChange": "handleIonChange($event.target)" } }, providers: [
{
provide: NG_VALUE_ACCESSOR,
useExisting: IonToggle_1,
multi: true,
},
], usesInheritance: true, ngImport: i0, template: '<ng-content></ng-content>', isInline: true, changeDetection: i0.ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush });
IonToggle = IonToggle_1 = __decorate([
ProxyCmp({
defineCustomElementFn: defineCustomElement$1i,
inputs: TOGGLE_INPUTS,
})
], IonToggle);
```
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the `ProxyCmp` usage in favor of manually calling proxyInputs
and proxyMethods.
- Also saw that select was missing a form control test, so I added one
The compiled code now looks something like this:
```typescript
class IonToggle extends ValueAccessor {
constructor(c, r, z, injector) {
super(injector, r);
this.z = z;
defineCustomElement$1i();
proxyInputs(IonToggle, TOGGLE_INPUTS);
c.detach();
this.el = r.nativeElement;
proxyOutputs(this, this.el, ['ionChange', 'ionFocus', 'ionBlur']);
}
writeValue(value) {
this.elementRef.nativeElement.checked = this.lastValue = value;
setIonicClasses(this.elementRef);
}
handleIonChange(el) {
this.handleValueChange(el, el.checked);
}
}
/** @nocollapse */ IonToggle.ɵfac = i0.ɵɵngDeclareFactory({ minVersion: "12.0.0", version: "14.2.12", ngImport: i0, type: IonToggle, deps: [{ token: i0.ChangeDetectorRef }, { token: i0.ElementRef }, { token: i0.NgZone }, { token: i0.Injector }], target: i0.ɵɵFactoryTarget.Component });
/** @nocollapse */ IonToggle.ɵcmp = i0.ɵɵngDeclareComponent({ minVersion: "14.0.0", version: "14.2.12", type: IonToggle, isStandalone: true, selector: "ion-toggle", inputs: { checked: "checked", color: "color", disabled: "disabled", enableOnOffLabels: "enableOnOffLabels", justify: "justify", labelPlacement: "labelPlacement", legacy: "legacy", mode: "mode", name: "name", value: "value" }, host: { listeners: { "ionChange": "handleIonChange($event.target)" } }, providers: [
{
provide: NG_VALUE_ACCESSOR,
useExisting: IonToggle,
multi: true,
},
], usesInheritance: true, ngImport: i0, template: '<ng-content></ng-content>', isInline: true, changeDetection: i0.ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush });
```
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Ryan provided some context on a related Stencil bug where doing
reassignments broke treeshaking in Webpack. While the source of this bug
is not Stencil, understanding the Stencil bug helped me better
understand this issue:
https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/issues/3191https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/pull/3248https://github.com/ionic-team/stencil/pull/4188 (fixes an issue
introduced in the above stencil PR)
Dev build: `7.5.1-dev.11697480817.10fa2601`
Issue number: resolves#28337
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Duplicate instances of `menuController` are being created in
`@ionic/angular`. `ion-menu` registers itself in the `menuController`
from `@ionic/core`, but the `MenuController` from `@ionic/angular` uses
the `menuController` from `@ionic/core/components`. This is how the
overlay providers work too. Normally, this is not a problem. However,
`menuController` caches references to registered menus in each
controller instances:
dcbf45101f/core/src/utils/menu-controller/index.ts (L14)
This means that since there are two different controllers,
`menuController` B does not know about the menus in `menuController` A.
The end result is that the menu controller used in developer
applications did not have references to the registered menus, which gave
the impression that the menu controller did not work.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Updated the architecture of `MenuController` in Ionic Angular to
accept a `menuController` instance. This allows `@ionic/angular` to pass
the `menuController` from `@ionic/core` and for
`@ionic/angular/standalone` to pass the `menuController` from
`@ionic/core/components`.
Note: Overlay controllers don't **need** this change per-se since they
don't cache references to overlays internally (they just query the DOM).
However, I think it would be good to have a consistent architecture
here, so I'll put up a separate PR that makes this change for overlays
too.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
Dev build: `7.5.1-dev.11697123035.1ee6b4a2`
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
**1. Bundle Size Reductions**
All Ionic UI components and Ionicons are added to the final bundle of an
Ionic Angular application. This is because all components and icons are
lazily loaded as needed. This prevents the compiler from properly tree
shaking applications. This does not cause all components and icons to be
loaded on application start, but it does increase the size of the final
app output that all users need to download.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionicons/issues/910https://github.com/ionic-team/ionicons/issues/536https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27280https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24352
**2. Standalone Component Support**
Standalone Components are a stable API as of Angular 15. The Ionic
starter apps on the CLI have NgModule and Standalone options, but all of
the Ionic components are still lazily/dynamically loaded using
`IonicModule`. Standalone components in Ionic also enable support for
new Angular features such as bundling with ESBuild instead of Webpack.
ESBuild does not work in Ionic Angular right now because components
cannot be statically analyzed since they are dynamically imported.
We added preliminary support for standalone components in Ionic v6.3.0.
This enabled developers to use their own custom standalone components
when routing with `ion-router-outlet`. However, we did not ship
standalone components for Ionic's UI components.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/25404https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27251https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/27387
**3. Faster Component Load Times**
Since Ionic Angular components are lazily loaded, they also need to be
hydrated. However, this hydration does not happen immediately which
prevents components from being usable for multiple frames.
**Related Issues**
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24352https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/26474
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ionic components and directives are accessible as Angular standalone
components/directives
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Associated documentation branch:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-docs/tree/feature-7.5
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Amanda Johnston <90629384+amandaejohnston@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <maria@ionic.io>
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <13732623+sean-perkins@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
CI is failing for Cypress apps due to
https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress/issues/27804#issuecomment-1721476731.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- All Cypress test apps have been updated to Cypress 13.2.0 which is not
affected by this issue.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
- The instructions doesn't provide clear directory paths for syncing
local changes.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The instructions has clear directory paths for syncing local changes.
- Switched to the `[!NOTE]` for notes.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
N/A
Issue number: Resolves#23480
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Angular's min/max validators do not work with `ion-input[type=number]`.
Using the built-in validators with `ion-input` will not update the
control status to invalid, reflect the `ng-invalid` class or report the
correct errors.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The `IonicModule` now includes two additional directive declarations
that extend Angular's built-in min/max validators and target the
`ion-input` component when using `type="number"`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Resolves#27476
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Ionic Angular application on Angular v16 cannot use the
[`bindToComponentInputs`](https://angular.io/api/router/ExtraOptions#bindToComponentInputs)
feature to assign route parameters, query parameters, route data and
route resolve data to component inputs.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ionic Angular developers can use the option on `RouterModule.forRoot`
to enable the Angular feature for binding the route snapshot data to the
component inputs.
**Modules**
```ts
@NgModule({
imports: [
RouterModule.forRoot([/* your routes */], {
bindToComponentInputs: true // <-- enable this feature
})
]
})
export class AppModule { }
```
**Standalone**
```ts
import { withComponentInputBinding } from '@angular/router';
bootstrapApplication(App, {
providers: [
provideRouter(routes,
//... other features
withComponentInputBinding() // <-- enable this feature
)
],
});
```
With this feature enabled, developers can bind route parameters, query
parameters, route data and the returned value from a resolver to input
bindings on their component.
For example, with a route configuration of:
```ts
RouterModule.forChild([
{
path: ':id',
data: {
title: 'Hello world'
},
resolve: {
name: () => 'Resolved name'
},
loadComponent: () => import('./example-component/example.component').then(c => c.ExampleComponent)
}
])
```
and a component configuration of:
```ts
@Component({ })
export class ExampleComponent {
@Input() id?: string;
@Input() title?: string;
@Input() name?: string;
@Input() query?: string;
}
```
Navigating to the component with a url of: `/2?query=searchphrase`
The following would occur:
- `id` would return `2`
- `title` would return `Hello world`
- `name` would return `Resolved name`
- `query` would return `searchphrase`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
This PR will need to be targeted to a minor release once a design doc is
approved by the team.
Dev-build: `7.1.3-dev.11689276547.129acb40`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `angular` directory sits at the root of the project instead of in
`packages` with all the other JS Framework integrations. This does not
cause any functional issues with Ionic, but it is confusing since
integrations are not in a consistent place.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Moves the `angular` directory to `packages/angular`
Note: Most files should remain unchanged. The only files I changed are
the files that had direct paths to the old `angular` directory:
1. Removes the `angular` path in `lerna.json`. This is now covered by
`packages/*`
2. Updated the angular file path in `.gitignore`
3. Updates the path to the angular package in `stencil.config.ts` for
the Angular Output Targets
4. Updates some of Angular's sync scripts to correctly get the core
stylesheets as well as the core package.
5. Updates the test app sync script to correctly sync core and
angular-server
~I'm not entirely sure why GitHub thinks
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/27719/files#diff-f5bba7e7c7c75426e2b9c89868310cb03890493b4efe0252adf8d12cc8398962
is a new file since it exists in `main` here:
1f06be4a31/angular/test/base/scripts/build-ionic.sh~
Fixed in
6e7fc49827
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.1.2-dev.11688052109.13454f5c`
