Issue number: resolves#28838
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
In #28316 we resolved a longstanding misconfiguration where event
listeners being added to the page were not removed. This was due to
incorrect usage of `.bind` creating a new instance of the callback
functions.
By removing the event listener for `ionViewDidLeave`, before the
component has actually unmounted in react, resulted in the registered
destroy callback to not fire:
51c729eafc/packages/react/src/contexts/IonLifeCycleContext.tsx (L208-L216)
and
51c729eafc/packages/react/src/routing/ViewLifeCycleManager.tsx (L21-L32)
This resulted in a scenario that using a `Redirect` could cause the
wrong view to be unmounted (the entering view) and leave the user on an
empty screen.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `ionViewDidEnter` event listener *is not* removed while the component
is unmounting. The browser will naturally remove the event listener when
the element node is detached from the DOM.
- Users are no longer presented with a white screen after clicking a
route that uses a redirect.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `7.6.7-dev.11706567011.11e782a9`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The packages, Angular, React, and Vue, will accept any `app_dir`
parameter when passing it to the build script. This can lead to a user
to entering a directory that doesn't exist within `test/apps`. If this
happens, then the build folder will include an incomplete test app.
For example:
1. `./build ng13`
2. This creates a `build/ng13` folder, but the folder only contains the
contents from the `base` folder. This causes it to be incomplete.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Provides a message that the provided app directory doesn't exist.
- Does not create the incomplete app when an invalid app directory is
given.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
4. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
5. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
N/A
Issue number: None
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
People adding a new Angular test app don't know they need to update the
Stencil nightly build.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Documentation exists for adding a new Angular version to the Stencil
nightly build when creating a new Angular test app..
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
This is related to #28945
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Several tests were still using the legacy form syntax.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Migrated tests in `core`, `angular`, and `vue` to use the modern form
syntax (`react` did not have form controls).
I opted not to migrate `item/test/highlight` and `item/test/counter`
because those tests are going to be removed in the future once the
deprecate item APIs are removed.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: ionitron <hi@ionicframework.com>
Co-authored-by: Maria Hutt <thetaPC@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
React and React Router packages do not build correctly on Windows
because certain dependencies were not marked as external.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- 3rd party packages are correctly marked as external
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
The `IonPicker` tests in the React app were skipped due to a Stencil bug
that has since been resolved.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
Tests re-enabled.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
This script was used to aid in the test of local version of
`@ionic/angular`. However, these instructions have been replaced by the
instructions in `packages/angular/test/README.md`. This PR removes the
old script.
Issue number: resolves#28774
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
There are two issues causing Ionic Vue apps to not behave as intended
with certain versions of Vue:
1. In Vue 3.3 a [breaking change
shipped](https://github.com/vuejs/core/issues/9916) that changes the
default behavior of the `watch` inside of IonRouterOutlet to be a
shallow watcher instead of a deep watcher. This caused the router outlet
to not consistent re-render. While the change was later reverted by the
Vue team, they expressed that the change [may re-land in a future minor
release](https://github.com/vuejs/core/issues/9965#issuecomment-1875067499).
As a result, we will need to account for this inside of Ionic.
2. In Vue 3.2 a [custom elements improvement
shipped](https://github.com/vuejs/core/blob/main/changelogs/CHANGELOG-3.2.md#3238-2022-08-30)
that changed how custom elements are referred to in VNodes.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The affected `watch` call now is now explicitly a deep watcher. This
change is backwards compatible as well as forward compatible with
upcoming Vue changes.
- Updated IonTabs to account for the new VNode behavior for custom
elements. Ionic still supports version of Vue that do not have this
improvement, so we need to account for both behaviors for now. I also
added a tech debt ticket to remove the old checks when we drop support
for older versions of Vue.
- Updated E2E test dependencies. During this update some of our tests
needed to be updated to account for newer versions of Vue/Vitest.
Overall I was able to simplify a lot of our tests as a result.
I plan to add renovatebot to these E2E test apps, but I will handle that
in a separate PR.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
4. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
5. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.6-dev.11705526292.1bc0acb5`
Note: Both of the issues cause tests to fail when using the latest
dependencies in the Vue E2E test app. However, I need to use the latest
dependencies so I can demonstrate that my changes do fix the reported
issues. As a result, I have both fixes in the same PR.
Issue number: resolves#28827
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
This import was renamed to `IonBackButton` as part of
9f20780d66.
However, we did not consider that some developers are importing this to
use with `ViewChild`. While we should keep alignment with other
component imports, we need to support the old import until we can make a
breaking change in Ionic 8.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds the old IonBackButtonDelegate import
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.5-dev.11705352188.1c6cdb08`
Issue number: resolves#28716
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
All components that have per-mode stylesheets can have their mode
adjusted by setting `mode` on the component. We use the `setMode`
function to determine which mode to use on the component:
516b84475e/core/src/global/ionic-global.ts (L75)
While this works on refresher, it is missing the `virtualProp` jsdoc
comment which causes it to not have the appropriate type information. As
a result, when developers try to use a JS binding for `mode`, they will
get compilation errors.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Adds virtualProp for mode to refresher
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!--
If this introduces a breaking change:
1. Describe the impact and migration path for existing applications
below.
2. Update the BREAKING.md file with the breaking change.
3. Add "BREAKING CHANGE: [...]" to the commit description when merging.
See
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/blob/main/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#footer
for more information.
-->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
I am considering this a bug fix instead of a feature. In non-TypeScript
environments you can set `mode` on `ion-refresher` and it does change
the mode. What's missing here is the type information associated with
it.
Dev build: `7.6.2-dev.11702914017.1ae72da5`
Issue number: N/A
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Ionic React projects using `@types/react@18.2.43` or greater will run
into a type-check error on build with `IonRouterOutlet` and potentially
other components:
```
Property 'placeholder' is missing in type '{ children: Element[]; }' but required in type 'Pick<IonRouterOutlet & { basePath?: string | undefined; ref?: Ref<any> | undefined; ionPage?: boolean | undefined; } & IonicReactProps & Omit<...>, "color" | ... 254 more ... | "ionPage">'.
```
Definitely typed decided to make a breaking type change in a patch
release:
b954269038
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Patches the type to allow for compatibility between React v16, 17 and
18.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
### Testing
1. Create a new Ionic react project with the "list" template.
2. Run `npm run build`
3. Observe: Exception posted above
4. Install the dev-build
5. Run `npm run build`
6. Observe: No exception, build passes
7. You can additionally serve the app to verify no runtime
exceptions/broken behavior.
Dev-build: `7.6.1-dev.11702322681.17e39348`
Issue number: resolves#24260
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
When replacing a route (`router.push(newRoute, 'none', 'replace')`) the
`RouterDirection` from the route being replaced is being used (if it
exists) instead of the new one the user specifies.
## What is the new behavior?
User-specified `RouteDirection` is used, if it exists. If it doesn't it
falls back to the `RouteDirection` of the route being replaced.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
Please see the following comment for why I think the current behavior is
incorrect, and why this change is needed:
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/issues/24260#issuecomment-1078960780
---------
Co-authored-by: Liam DeBeasi <liamdebeasi@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue number: resolves#28673
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When reviewing https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/pull/28671
I noticed a bug where the custom animation was not used when going back
after a replace.
`handleNavigate` will override whatever is in `incomingRouteParams`.
Since we were passing `routeAnimation` (which is `undefined`), it was
overriding the animation we set in `handleNavigateBack`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `routeAnimation` is no longer overridden
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.6.1-dev.11702048520.13c82dad`
Issue number: resolves#20053
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
There are a few methods that that are missing for the menu in the
Angular packages. This leads to users to not being able to use methods
like `isAnimating()`.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- The missing methods have been added by implementing `MenuControllerI`.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: 7.5.8-dev.11701461830.1be851fd
Issue number: Resolves#26524
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## Definitions
**Parameterized routes**: A route that includes one or more variables in
the path segments, such as `/form/:index`.
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When an application routes from a parameterized route, to an
intermediary route, to the same parameterized route, but with a
different value/url, Ionic's routing logic is incorrectly reusing the
view item from the first instance of the parameterized route instead of
calculating that the matched path is different. This results in the
wrong view item being recycled and rendered.
Another way of representing it:
- User navigates to `/form/0` which resolves `FormPage`
- User enters `0` into the form and submits the form
- User navigates to `/link`, which resolves `LinkPage`
- User navigates to `/form/1`, which resolves `FormPage`
- However, instead of creating a new instance of `FormPage` it is
reusing the instance of `FormPage` from `/form/0` which includes the
form having `0` in the input.
- The user now sees a "new view", but with cached data in the form.
This is not expected or desired.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Ionic's routing logic will validate if the entering view item matches
the match route data before reusing it. This results in new instances of
the view item being constructed when using parameterized routes.
https://github.com/ionic-team/ionic-framework/assets/13732623/e7e3d03f-2848-4429-9f60-9074d0761e45
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `7.5.8-dev.11701383555.17254408`
Issue number: resolves#28611
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
It's not possible to pass props that are not camelCase to the `IonNav`
component.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- It is now possible to set a props with kebab-case instead of camelCase
(for example, `root-params` instead of `rootParams`)
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [X] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
⚠️ This is my first PR for ionic so I hope I didn't miss important steps
into the process. I also checked on my project that the fix is working
well. Thank you! 🙂
---------
Co-authored-by: Sean Perkins <sean@ionic.io>
Issue number: resolves#28385
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
Overlay controllers do not register their respective overlays
components. This results in the overlay not appearing.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Each standalone overlay controller manually calls
`defineCustomElement` for their respective overlay component to ensure
the component is loaded/registered.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev build: `7.5.6-dev.11700492285.1581ed02`
Issue number: Resolves#28514
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
<!-- Please describe the current behavior that you are modifying. -->
When using the `@ionic/angular` schematic in an Angular 17 project (`ng
add @ionic/angular`), developers will receive an error preventing the
schematic from running.
Additionally, the previous implementations of the schematic are out of
sync with the current state of the Ionic starters:
- `variables.css` is empty and missing Ionic's defaults
- `ionic.config.json` is not created
- Schematic does not have support for module vs. standalone projects.
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- `ng add @ionic/angular` works with Angular 17 projects
- `ng add @ionic/angular` has fallback behavior for Angular 16 projects
using `AppModule`
- Schematics now includes the proper `variables.css` from Ionic starters
- Ionicons assets will no longer be copied when being added to a
standalone project
- Refactors a majority of the implementation to use the utilities that
come directly from `@angular-devkit/schematics` and
`@schematics/angular`.
- Sets the `@ionic/angular-toolkit` CLI configuration and schematics
configuration in the `angular.json`
- Creates missing `ionic.config.json`
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Dev-build: `7.5.5-dev.11700239837.1925bbdb`
To test this PR:
1. Install Angular CLI v17 - `npm install -g @angular/cli@17`
2. Create a new project - `ng new angular-17`
3. Use the dev-build: - `ng add
@ionic/angular@7.5.5-dev.11700239837.1925bbdb`
4. Confirm the prompts
5. Validate that `provideIonicAngular({})` is added to the
`app.config.ts`
6. Validate that `ionic.config.json` was created
7. Validate that `angular.json` was updated with the
`@ionic/angular-devkit` configurations
Now verify legacy behavior:
1. Install Angular CLI v16 - `npm install -g @angular/cli@16`
2. Create a new project - `ng new angular-16`
3. Use the dev-build - `ng add
@ionic/angular@7.5.5-dev.11700239837.1925bbdb`
4. Confirm the prompts
5. Validate that `IonicModule.forRoot({})` is added to the
`app.module.ts`
8. Validate the ionicons glob pattern is added to the `angular.json`
9. Validate the `ionic.config.json` was created
10. Validate the `angular.json` was updated with the
`@ionic/angular-devkit` configurations
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common loading provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common alert provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
Issue number: Internal
---------
<!-- Please do not submit updates to dependencies unless it fixes an
issue. -->
<!-- Please try to limit your pull request to one type (bugfix, feature,
etc). Submit multiple pull requests if needed. -->
## What is the current behavior?
As a takeaway from our learning session about a menuController bug in
Ionic Angular, the team would like to update our other providers to use
the same architecture as the menuController to prevent this kind of
issue from happening again in the future.
We also noticed that the common provider does not provide much value and
it's easier to just have two separate implementations in `src` and
`standalone`. (There wasn't much code we could de-duplicate)
## What is the new behavior?
<!-- Please describe the behavior or changes that are being added by
this PR. -->
- Removed the common picker provider in favor of separate ones in
src/standalone
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
<!-- If this introduces a breaking change, please describe the impact
and migration path for existing applications below. -->
## Other information
<!-- Any other information that is important to this PR such as
screenshots of how the component looks before and after the change. -->
