mirror of https://github.com/foss42/apidash.git synced 2025-12-10 07:08:08 +08:00

Files

copilot-swe-agent[bot] 168c4ed6eb Add comprehensive STRIDE threat model and incident response plan

Co-authored-by: animator <615622+animator@users.noreply.github.com>

2025-12-04 21:13:39 +00:00

54 KiB

Raw Blame History

Incident Response Plan (IRP) for API Dash

Document Version: 1.0
Effective Date: December 2025
Project: API Dash - Open Source Cross-Platform API Client
Classification: Public
Review Cycle: Annually or post-incident

Executive Summary
Purpose and Scope
Incident Response Team
Incident Classification and Severity
Incident Response Lifecycle
Communication Plan
Incident Types and Response Procedures
Post-Incident Activities
Tools and Resources
Training and Awareness
Legal and Compliance
Plan Maintenance
Appendices

1. Executive Summary

This Incident Response Plan (IRP) establishes a structured approach for identifying, managing, and resolving security incidents affecting the API Dash open source project. API Dash is a cross-platform API testing client used by developers worldwide, making security incident response critical to maintaining user trust and protecting the community.

Key Objectives

Rapid Detection: Identify security incidents quickly through community reporting and automated monitoring
Effective Response: Contain and resolve incidents with minimal impact to users
Transparent Communication: Keep the community informed while protecting sensitive details
Continuous Improvement: Learn from incidents to strengthen security posture
Compliance: Adhere to responsible disclosure practices and regulatory requirements

Incident Response Goals (2025 Standards)

Detection Time: < 1 hour for critical vulnerabilities
Initial Response: < 4 hours for critical, < 24 hours for high severity
Patch Release: < 72 hours for critical vulnerabilities
Public Disclosure: Within 90 days of fix, coordinated with reporters
Post-Incident Review: Within 7 days of incident resolution

2. Purpose and Scope

2.1 Purpose

This IRP provides:

Clear procedures for handling security incidents
Defined roles and responsibilities
Communication protocols
Documentation requirements
Recovery procedures

2.2 Scope

In Scope:

Security vulnerabilities in API Dash application code
Vulnerabilities in API Dash dependencies and packages
Security issues in build/release infrastructure
Supply chain attacks affecting distribution
Data breaches involving user credentials or sensitive information
Malicious code or backdoors in the codebase
Security incidents affecting project infrastructure (GitHub, website)
Social engineering attacks targeting maintainers or users
Compromised releases or distribution channels

Out of Scope:

General bugs or functionality issues (use GitHub Issues)
User configuration errors or misuse
Security of third-party APIs being tested
User device security (unless caused by API Dash)
Individual user support requests
Feature requests or enhancements

2.3 Applicability

This IRP applies to:

All API Dash maintainers and contributors
Security researchers reporting vulnerabilities
Users affected by security incidents
Third-party security teams coordinating disclosures

3. Incident Response Team

3.1 Core Team Structure

3.1.1 Incident Commander (IC)

Role: Overall incident coordination and decision-making
Primary: Lead Maintainer (@foss42 GitHub organization)
Backup: Senior Maintainer

Responsibilities:

Activate incident response procedures
Coordinate team activities
Make critical decisions
Approve public communications
Declare incident closure

3.1.2 Security Lead

Role: Technical security assessment and remediation
Primary: Security-focused maintainer
Backup: Senior developer with security experience

Responsibilities:

Vulnerability analysis and validation
Risk assessment and severity classification
Technical remediation guidance
Security patch development
Coordinate with security researchers

3.1.3 Communications Lead

Role: Internal and external communications
Primary: Project lead or designated spokesperson
Backup: Senior maintainer

Responsibilities:

Draft incident communications
Manage GitHub Security Advisories
Coordinate vulnerability disclosure
Update community on incident status
Handle media inquiries (if applicable)

3.1.4 Technical Lead

Role: Code fixes and release management
Primary: Core maintainer with release permissions
Backup: Senior developer

Responsibilities:

Develop and test security patches
Emergency release coordination
Code review of security fixes
Verify fix effectiveness
Update dependencies

3.1.5 Documentation Lead

Role: Incident documentation and reporting
Primary: Designated maintainer
Backup: Any core team member

Responsibilities:

Document incident timeline
Maintain incident logs
Create post-incident reports
Update security documentation
Track action items

3.2 Extended Team

Community Moderators: Manage community communications
Legal Advisor: Provide legal guidance (if available)
External Security Experts: Consultants for complex incidents
Platform Representatives: GitHub, distribution platform contacts

3.3 Contact Information

Primary Communication Channel: Private GitHub Security Advisory
Emergency Contact: security@apidash.dev (or maintainer emails)
Escalation Path: GitHub organization owners → CNCF security team (if applicable)

Response Time Commitments:

Critical: Response within 4 hours
High: Response within 24 hours
Medium: Response within 72 hours
Low: Response within 1 week

4. Incident Classification and Severity

4.1 Severity Levels (Aligned with CVSS 3.1)

CRITICAL (CVSS 9.0-10.0)

Definition: Vulnerabilities with severe impact requiring immediate action

Examples:

Remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities
Arbitrary code execution in template engine
Critical data exposure of all users' credentials
Supply chain compromise (malicious dependency)
Backdoor or malicious code in releases

Response SLA:

Initial Response: 4 hours
Assessment: 8 hours
Patch Development: 48 hours
Patch Release: 72 hours
Public Disclosure: Immediate advisory, full disclosure after 7-14 days

HIGH (CVSS 7.0-8.9)

Definition: Significant vulnerabilities that could lead to major impact

Examples:

Authentication bypass
Privilege escalation vulnerabilities
SQL injection or command injection in generated code
Unencrypted storage of sensitive credentials
Deserialization vulnerabilities
XSS or code injection in UI components

Response SLA:

Initial Response: 24 hours
Assessment: 48 hours
Patch Development: 1 week
Patch Release: 2 weeks
Public Disclosure: Full disclosure after 30 days

MEDIUM (CVSS 4.0-6.9)

Definition: Vulnerabilities with moderate impact

Examples:

Information disclosure of non-critical data
CSRF vulnerabilities
Insecure defaults
Path traversal with limited impact
Denial of service (local only)
Weak cryptography

Response SLA:

Initial Response: 72 hours
Assessment: 1 week
Patch Development: 2-4 weeks
Patch Release: Next regular release
Public Disclosure: Full disclosure after 60 days

LOW (CVSS 0.1-3.9)

Definition: Minor vulnerabilities with limited impact

Examples:

Information leakage with minimal impact
Security misconfigurations
Minor input validation issues
Non-sensitive data exposure

Response SLA:

Initial Response: 1 week
Assessment: 2 weeks
Patch Development: As resources allow
Patch Release: Next regular release
Public Disclosure: Full disclosure after 90 days

4.2 Incident Categories

Category	Description	Examples
Vulnerability	Security flaws in code or dependencies	CVE-reported vulnerabilities
Data Breach	Unauthorized access to sensitive data	Credential exposure, data leak
Malicious Code	Intentional backdoors or malware	Supply chain attack, compromised dependency
Infrastructure	Compromise of project infrastructure	GitHub account takeover, website defacement
Social Engineering	Attacks targeting team or users	Phishing, impersonation
Availability	DoS or service disruption	Resource exhaustion attacks

4.3 Impact Assessment Factors

Severity is determined by evaluating:

Confidentiality Impact: Risk of unauthorized information disclosure
Integrity Impact: Risk of data or system modification
Availability Impact: Risk of service disruption
Scope: Number of users affected (single user vs. all users)
Exploitability: Ease of exploitation (simple vs. complex)
User Interaction: Required user interaction (none vs. significant)
Privileges Required: Attacker privileges needed (none vs. admin)

5. Incident Response Lifecycle

5.1 Phase 1: Preparation

Ongoing Activities

1. Proactive Security Measures

Enable GitHub Dependabot alerts
Implement automated security scanning in CI/CD
Regular dependency updates and security patches
Security training for maintainers
Maintain updated contact information

2. Monitoring and Detection

Monitor GitHub Security Advisories
Subscribe to security mailing lists for dependencies
Track Dependabot alerts
Monitor community reports and discussions
Review CodeQL scan results

3. Tools and Access

Maintain incident response toolkit
Ensure access to critical systems
Keep security advisory templates ready
Maintain vulnerability disclosure page
Prepare patch release procedures

4. Documentation

Keep IRP updated
Maintain security runbooks
Document emergency procedures
Maintain stakeholder contact lists

5.2 Phase 2: Detection and Analysis

Step 1: Incident Detection

Detection Sources:

GitHub Security Advisories (private vulnerability reports)
Dependabot alerts (dependency vulnerabilities)
Community reports (security@apidash.dev or GitHub Issues)
Security researchers (coordinated disclosure)
Automated scanning (CodeQL, SAST tools)
Social media (public vulnerability discussions)
Third-party notification (GitHub Security Lab, etc.)

Initial Actions (within 1 hour):

[ ] Acknowledge receipt of report
[ ] Assign incident commander
[ ] Create private security advisory or issue
[ ] Gather initial information
[ ] Avoid public discussion until assessed

Step 2: Initial Triage

Triage Checklist:

[ ] Validate the vulnerability (is it real?)
[ ] Determine affected versions
[ ] Assess exploitability
[ ] Identify attack vectors
[ ] Check if exploit is public or in the wild
[ ] Determine initial severity (preliminary)
[ ] Assign to Security Lead

Triage Decision Matrix:

Valid Security Issue → Proceed to analysis
Non-Security Bug → Route to regular issue tracking
Duplicate/Known → Reference existing advisory/issue
Invalid/Not Reproducible → Close with explanation

Step 3: Detailed Analysis

Analysis Activities:

Reproduce the Vulnerability
- Set up test environment
- Follow reproduction steps
- Document exact conditions
- Capture evidence (screenshots, logs)
Impact Assessment
- Determine CVSS score
- Identify affected components
- Assess data at risk
- Estimate user impact (percentage/count)
- Identify downstream effects
Root Cause Analysis
- Identify vulnerable code
- Determine when introduced (git blame)
- Check if present in other locations
- Identify similar vulnerabilities
Attack Surface Mapping
- Identify all attack vectors
- List prerequisites for exploitation
- Document required privileges
- Assess network exposure

Analysis Output:

Severity classification (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
Affected versions and components
Root cause summary
Exploitation requirements
Recommended remediation approach

5.3 Phase 3: Containment

Short-term Containment

Immediate Actions (Critical/High severity):

For Critical Vulnerabilities in Released Versions:

[ ] Confirm severity with team consensus
[ ] Activate emergency response team
[ ] Create GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA)
[ ] Begin patch development immediately
[ ] Prepare interim workarounds if possible
[ ] Consider temporary removal of vulnerable features

For Infrastructure Compromise:

[ ] Revoke compromised credentials immediately
[ ] Enable 2FA on all accounts (if not enabled)
[ ] Audit access logs
[ ] Change all shared secrets
[ ] Lock down affected systems
[ ] Preserve forensic evidence

For Supply Chain Attacks:

[ ] Identify malicious dependency/code
[ ] Pin previous known-good versions
[ ] Alert users immediately (critical advisory)
[ ] Remove malicious packages from distribution
[ ] Contact platform providers (npm, pub.dev)

For Data Breach:

[ ] Identify scope of data exposure
[ ] Contain data leak source
[ ] Preserve evidence
[ ] Prepare user notification
[ ] Assess regulatory obligations

Long-term Containment

Sustained Response Actions:

Implement temporary security controls
Monitor for exploitation attempts
Prepare comprehensive fix
Coordinate with security researcher
Plan disclosure timeline

5.4 Phase 4: Eradication

Root Cause Elimination

1. Develop Security Fix:

[ ] Design secure solution
[ ] Implement fix in development branch
[ ] Add regression tests
[ ] Perform security code review
[ ] Test fix thoroughly
[ ] Verify no new vulnerabilities introduced
[ ] Document changes

2. Code Review Requirements:

Minimum 2 security-aware reviewers
Focus on security implications
Check for similar issues elsewhere
Validate input handling
Review error handling
Verify no information leakage

3. Testing Validation:

Unit tests for security fix
Integration tests
Regression testing
Security testing (fuzzing, penetration testing)
Performance impact assessment
Cross-platform validation

4. Dependency Updates:

[ ] Identify updated secure versions
[ ] Test compatibility
[ ] Update pubspec.yaml
[ ] Verify no breaking changes
[ ] Update lockfiles
[ ] Test on all supported platforms

5.5 Phase 5: Recovery

Release and Deployment

1. Emergency Patch Release Process:

# Emergency Release Checklist
[ ] Create release branch from main
[ ] Apply security fix
[ ] Update version number (patch bump)
[ ] Update CHANGELOG.md with security notice
[ ] Run full test suite
[ ] Build release artifacts for all platforms
[ ] Sign releases (if applicable)
[ ] Create GitHub release
[ ] Publish to distribution channels
[ ] Update documentation
[ ] Verify release availability

2. Release Prioritization:

Severity	Release Timeline	Release Type
Critical	48-72 hours	Emergency patch
High	1-2 weeks	Security patch
Medium	2-4 weeks	Regular release
Low	Next planned release	Regular release

3. Release Announcement Template:

# Security Release: API Dash v{VERSION}

## Overview
This is a security release addressing [severity] vulnerability in API Dash.

## Affected Versions
- {version range}

## Fixed Vulnerabilities
- **{CVE-ID}** (Severity: {CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW})
  - {Brief description}
  - CVSS Score: {score}

## Recommended Action
All users should upgrade immediately to version {VERSION}.

## Upgrade Instructions
{Platform-specific upgrade steps}

## Workarounds (if applicable)
{Temporary workarounds for users who cannot upgrade immediately}

## Credits
We would like to thank {researcher name} for responsibly disclosing this vulnerability.

## References
- GitHub Security Advisory: {GHSA link}
- CVE: {CVE link}
- Detailed Security Advisory: {link}

4. Distribution Channels:

GitHub Releases (primary)
App Store (iOS/iPad)
Platform-specific package managers (apt, rpm, etc.)
Website download links
Documentation updates

5. User Notification:

GitHub Security Advisory (automatic notification to watchers)
Release notes
Social media (Twitter/X, Discord)
Security mailing list (if established)
In-app notification (for future versions)

Verification

Post-Release Validation:

[ ] Verify fix effectiveness
[ ] Confirm vulnerability no longer exploitable
[ ] Check all platforms updated
[ ] Monitor for issues with patch
[ ] Verify no regression introduced
[ ] Scan updated version with security tools

5.6 Phase 6: Post-Incident Activities

See Section 8: Post-Incident Activities for detailed procedures.

6. Communication Plan

6.1 Communication Principles

Transparency: Be open about incidents while protecting sensitive details
Timeliness: Communicate promptly at each phase
Accuracy: Provide verified information only
Clarity: Use clear, non-technical language for user communications
Coordination: Align with security researchers and stakeholders
Responsibility: Take ownership and accountability

6.2 Internal Communication

During Active Incident

Communication Channels:

Primary: Private GitHub Security Advisory discussion
Real-time: Dedicated Discord/Slack channel (private)
Documentation: Shared incident log (Google Docs or equivalent)
Escalation: Direct email to incident commander

Communication Cadence:

Critical: Updates every 4 hours minimum
High: Updates every 12 hours minimum
Medium/Low: Updates every 48 hours minimum

Status Update Template:

## Incident Status Update - {Date/Time}

**Incident ID**: {IR-YYYY-MM-DD-###}
**Severity**: {Level}
**Phase**: {Detection/Analysis/Containment/Eradication/Recovery}

### Current Status
{Brief status description}

### Activities Completed
- {Item 1}
- {Item 2}

### In Progress
- {Item 1}
- {Item 2}

### Next Steps
- {Item 1}
- {Item 2}

### Blockers/Issues
- {Any blockers}

### Expected Next Update
{Time}

6.3 External Communication

Communication to Security Researchers

Initial Response (within 4-24 hours):

Dear {Researcher Name},

Thank you for reporting this security issue to the API Dash project. 
We have received your report and assigned it ID {IR-YYYY-MM-DD-###}.

Our security team is currently analyzing the issue and will provide 
an initial assessment within {timeframe} hours.

We appreciate your responsible disclosure and will keep you updated 
on our progress.

Best regards,
API Dash Security Team

Progress Updates:

Provide updates every 7 days minimum
Share assessment results
Discuss remediation timeline
Coordinate disclosure date

Disclosure Coordination:

Dear {Researcher Name},

We have completed development of a fix for {vulnerability ID}. 
We plan to release version {VERSION} on {DATE}.

Proposed disclosure timeline:
- {DATE}: Patch release
- {DATE + 7 days}: Limited disclosure (GHSA)
- {DATE + 30 days}: Full public disclosure

Please let us know if you have any concerns with this timeline 
or if you need additional information.

Credit: We would like to credit you as "{Preferred Name/Handle}" 
in the advisory. Please confirm or provide alternative credit info.

Communication to Users

Security Advisory Template:

# Security Advisory: {Title}

**Advisory ID**: GHSA-{id}  
**CVE**: CVE-{year}-{number}  
**Severity**: {CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW}  
**Affected Versions**: {versions}  
**Fixed in Version**: {version}  
**Publication Date**: {date}

## Summary
{Brief, clear description of the vulnerability suitable for all audiences}

## Impact
{What could an attacker do? What data/systems are at risk?}

## Affected Configurations
{Are all users affected or only specific configurations?}

## Remediation

### Immediate Actions
1. Upgrade to version {VERSION} immediately
2. {Additional steps if needed}

### Workarounds (if patch not immediately possible)
{Temporary mitigations}

## Timeline
- {Date}: Vulnerability reported
- {Date}: Fix developed
- {Date}: Patch released
- {Date}: Public disclosure

## References
- Fix commit: {link}
- GitHub Security Advisory: {link}
- CVE Details: {link}

## Credits
Discovered by: {Researcher name/handle}  
Coordinated disclosure: {if applicable}

## Contact
For questions about this advisory: security@apidash.dev

Social Media/Community Update:

🔒 Security Update: API Dash v{VERSION} released

Fixed {CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW} severity vulnerability {CVE-ID}.

All users should update immediately.

Details: {link to GHSA}
Download: {link to release}

Thank you to @{researcher} for responsible disclosure.

#security #apidash #infosec

6.4 Media and Public Relations

For High-Profile Incidents:

Designate single spokesperson
Prepare statement in advance
Coordinate with legal (if available)
Monitor public discussion
Correct misinformation promptly

Statement Template:

API Dash Security Statement

The API Dash team was notified of a security vulnerability affecting 
versions {versions} on {date}. We immediately began investigating and 
developing a fix.

We have released version {VERSION} which addresses this issue. All users 
should upgrade as soon as possible.

We take security seriously and appreciate the responsible disclosure from 
the security community. Users can report security issues confidentially 
through our GitHub Security Advisories.

For more information: {link}

7. Incident Types and Response Procedures

7.1 Code Vulnerability

Scenario: Security flaw discovered in application code

Detection: Security researcher report, automated scan, or code review

Response Procedure:

Receive and Validate (0-4 hours)
- Acknowledge report
- Validate vulnerability
- Create private GHSA
- Assign severity
Analyze (4-24 hours)
- Reproduce issue
- Determine affected versions
- Assess impact
- Identify root cause
Develop Fix (24-72 hours for critical)
- Implement secure solution
- Add security tests
- Code review
- Test thoroughly
Release Patch (48-96 hours for critical)
- Create patch release
- Update documentation
- Publish GHSA
- Notify users
Monitor (1-2 weeks post-release)
- Track adoption
- Monitor for exploitation
- Address user questions

Example Decision Tree:

Vulnerability Report
    │
    ├─ Valid & Security-related?
    │   ├─ Yes → Assess Severity
    │   │        ├─ Critical → Emergency Response (4hr SLA)
    │   │        ├─ High → Priority Response (24hr SLA)
    │   │        └─ Med/Low → Standard Response (72hr SLA)
    │   └─ No → Route to standard bug tracking
    │
    └─ Continue with standard process

7.2 Dependency Vulnerability

Scenario: Vulnerability discovered in third-party dependency

Detection: Dependabot alert, security advisory, or manual audit

Response Procedure:

Assess Impact (0-24 hours)

[ ] Identify vulnerable dependency
[ ] Check if vulnerability affects API Dash usage
[ ] Determine exploitability in context
[ ] Check if transitive or direct dependency
[ ] Review available patches

Evaluate Remediation Options:
- Option A: Update to patched version
  - Test compatibility
  - Update pubspec.yaml
  - Verify fix
- Option B: Replace with alternative library
  - Research alternatives
  - Plan migration
  - Implement replacement
- Option C: Apply workaround
  - Disable vulnerable feature
  - Implement compensating controls
  - Document limitation
Release Update:
- For critical: Emergency patch within 72 hours
- For high: Security update within 1 week
- For medium/low: Next regular release

Documentation:

## Dependency Security Update

**Affected Dependency**: {package}@{version}
**Vulnerability**: {CVE or description}
**Severity**: {level}
**Resolution**: Updated to {package}@{new-version}
**API Dash Versions Affected**: {versions}
**Fixed in**: API Dash v{version}

Dependabot Integration:

# .github/dependabot.yml
version: 2
updates:
  - package-ecosystem: "pub"
    directory: "/"
    schedule:
      interval: "weekly"
    open-pull-requests-limit: 10
    labels:
      - "dependencies"
      - "security"
    assignees:
      - "security-team-member"

7.3 Supply Chain Attack

Scenario: Malicious code injected through compromised dependency or build pipeline

Detection:

Unexpected package behavior
Community reports of malicious activity
Checksum mismatches
Security tool alerts

Response Procedure (CRITICAL - IMMEDIATE ACTION):

Phase 1: Emergency Response (0-1 hour)

[ ] STOP all builds and releases immediately
[ ] Revoke access to compromised accounts/systems
[ ] Alert all maintainers via emergency channel
[ ] Preserve forensic evidence
[ ] Identify affected versions

Phase 2: Containment (1-4 hours)

[ ] Remove malicious packages from distribution
[ ] Contact platform providers (GitHub, App Stores)
[ ] Request takedown of compromised releases
[ ] Post emergency security advisory
[ ] Alert users through all channels
[ ] Identify attack vector

Phase 3: Analysis (4-24 hours)

[ ] Forensic analysis of compromise
[ ] Identify malicious code
[ ] Determine scope of impact
[ ] Assess data at risk
[ ] Check if source code compromised
[ ] Review commit history for malicious changes
[ ] Analyze access logs

Phase 4: Eradication (24-48 hours)

[ ] Remove all malicious code
[ ] Verify source code integrity
[ ] Rebuild from known-good source
[ ] Update all credentials and secrets
[ ] Implement additional security controls
[ ] Audit all dependencies

Phase 5: Recovery (48-96 hours)

[ ] Release clean version with new version number
[ ] Sign releases with new keys (if keys compromised)
[ ] Publish detailed incident report
[ ] Provide user guidance
[ ] Monitor for continued threats

User Communication (URGENT):

🚨 CRITICAL SECURITY ALERT 🚨

Versions {versions} of API Dash have been compromised with malicious code.

IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED:
1. UNINSTALL affected versions immediately
2. DO NOT use until further notice
3. Change any credentials entered in these versions
4. Monitor for suspicious activity

We are working to release a clean version and will update within {timeframe}.

More details: {link to emergency advisory}

7.4 Data Breach

Scenario: Unauthorized access to user data (credentials, API responses, etc.)

Response Procedure:

Phase 1: Initial Response (0-1 hour)

[ ] Confirm breach occurred
[ ] Identify data accessed/exfiltrated
[ ] Determine breach source
[ ] Contain the breach
[ ] Preserve evidence
[ ] Assess legal obligations (GDPR, CCPA, etc.)

Phase 2: Assessment (1-6 hours)

[ ] Identify affected users
[ ] Determine data sensitivity
[ ] Assess regulatory requirements
[ ] Estimate number of records affected
[ ] Document timeline of breach
[ ] Identify attack method

Phase 3: User Notification (6-72 hours)

[ ] Prepare notification message
[ ] Identify notification method
[ ] Comply with regulatory timelines (GDPR: 72 hours)
[ ] Provide user guidance
[ ] Set up support channel

Breach Notification Template:

# Data Breach Notification

**Date of Breach**: {date}  
**Date of Discovery**: {date}  
**Notification Date**: {date}

## What Happened
{Clear description of the breach}

## What Information Was Involved
{List of data types: credentials, API keys, response data, etc.}

## What We're Doing
{Steps taken to contain and investigate}

## What You Should Do
1. {Action item 1}
2. {Action item 2}
3. {Action item 3}

## Additional Information
{Resources, support contact, FAQ}

## Contact Us
{Contact information for questions}

Regulatory Compliance:

GDPR: Notify supervisory authority within 72 hours if EU data affected
CCPA: Notify affected California residents without unreasonable delay
Other jurisdictions: Follow applicable data breach notification laws

7.5 Infrastructure Compromise

Scenario: Unauthorized access to project infrastructure (GitHub, domains, etc.)

Response Procedure:

Phase 1: Immediate Lockdown (0-15 minutes)

[ ] Revoke compromised credentials
[ ] Enable/verify 2FA on all accounts
[ ] Change all passwords
[ ] Revoke API tokens and SSH keys
[ ] Lock affected repositories/systems
[ ] Contact platform support

Phase 2: Investigation (15 minutes - 2 hours)

[ ] Review access logs
[ ] Identify unauthorized actions
[ ] Determine entry point
[ ] Assess damage
[ ] Check for backdoors
[ ] Review recent commits/changes

Phase 3: Remediation (2-24 hours)

[ ] Revert unauthorized changes
[ ] Strengthen access controls
[ ] Audit all accounts and permissions
[ ] Review and update security policies
[ ] Implement additional monitoring
[ ] Consider new authentication methods (hardware keys)

Phase 4: Recovery (24-72 hours)

[ ] Restore systems to secure state
[ ] Verify integrity of code and releases
[ ] Re-establish trust in infrastructure
[ ] Communicate status to community
[ ] Document lessons learned

GitHub Specific Actions:

[ ] Review "Settings > Audit log"
[ ] Check "Security > Deploy keys"
[ ] Review "Settings > Collaborators"
[ ] Verify branch protection rules
[ ] Check webhook configurations
[ ] Review GitHub Actions workflows
[ ] Verify code signing keys

7.6 Malicious Code Contribution

Scenario: Intentional backdoor or malicious code in pull request or commit

Response Procedure:

Phase 1: Detection (0-1 hour)

[ ] Identify suspicious code
[ ] Determine if merged to main branch
[ ] Check if released to users
[ ] Identify contributor
[ ] Preserve evidence

Phase 2: Containment (1-4 hours)

[ ] Revert malicious commits immediately
[ ] Block contributor if intentional
[ ] Check for other malicious contributions
[ ] Audit recent code changes
[ ] Determine if emergency release needed

Phase 3: Analysis (4-24 hours)

[ ] Analyze malicious code intent
[ ] Determine what it could do
[ ] Check if exploited
[ ] Review contributor history
[ ] Assess trust in other contributions

Phase 4: Communication (24-48 hours)

[ ] If released: Issue security advisory
[ ] Report to GitHub abuse team
[ ] Alert community if severe
[ ] Update contribution guidelines
[ ] Strengthen code review process

Prevention Measures:

Require code review from trusted maintainers
Use automated security scanning on PRs
Implement CODEOWNERS file
Suspicious code review checklist
Contributor verification for sensitive changes

8. Post-Incident Activities

8.1 Post-Incident Review (PIR)

Timing: Within 7 days of incident resolution

Attendees:

Incident Commander
All IR team members involved
Relevant stakeholders

Agenda:

Incident timeline review
What went well
What could be improved
Action items

PIR Template:

# Post-Incident Review: {Incident ID}

**Date**: {date}
**Facilitator**: {name}
**Attendees**: {list}

## Incident Summary
- **ID**: {IR-YYYY-MM-DD-###}
- **Type**: {vulnerability/breach/infrastructure/etc.}
- **Severity**: {level}
- **Duration**: {detection to resolution}
- **Impact**: {users affected, scope}

## Timeline
| Time | Event | Owner |
|------|-------|-------|
| {timestamp} | {event description} | {person} |
| ... | ... | ... |

## Metrics
- Time to detect: {duration}
- Time to respond: {duration}
- Time to patch: {duration}
- Time to resolve: {duration}
- Users affected: {number/percentage}

## What Went Well ✅
1. {Item 1}
2. {Item 2}
3. {Item 3}

## What Could Be Improved 🔄
1. {Item 1}
   - Root cause: {why}
   - Impact: {what was the effect}
   - Recommendation: {how to fix}

2. {Item 2}
   - Root cause: {why}
   - Impact: {what was the effect}
   - Recommendation: {how to fix}

## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Priority | Due Date | Status |
|--------|-------|----------|----------|--------|
| {Action 1} | {name} | {P0/P1/P2} | {date} | {Open/In Progress/Done} |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

## Lessons Learned
1. {Lesson 1}
2. {Lesson 2}
3. {Lesson 3}

## Documentation Updates Needed
- [ ] Update IRP
- [ ] Update threat model
- [ ] Update security documentation
- [ ] Update developer guidelines
- [ ] Update monitoring/detection

## Follow-up Meeting
Scheduled for: {date} to review action item progress

8.2 Documentation

Incident Log: Maintain a comprehensive log of all security incidents:

# Security Incident Log

| ID | Date | Type | Severity | Status | Resolution |
|----|------|------|----------|--------|------------|
| IR-2025-12-001 | 2025-12-01 | Vulnerability | HIGH | Resolved | Patched in v1.2.3 |
| IR-2025-11-045 | 2025-11-15 | Dependency | MEDIUM | Resolved | Updated dep |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

Knowledge Base: Create runbooks for common scenarios:

Dependency update procedure
Emergency release process
Infrastructure compromise response
Data breach notification process

8.3 Improvement Actions

Security Enhancements: Based on incident learnings:

Implement additional security controls
Update threat model
Enhance monitoring/detection
Improve tooling
Add security tests
Update documentation

Process Improvements:

Refine IRP procedures
Update response checklists
Improve communication templates
Enhance training materials
Streamline escalation paths

Training:

Conduct incident retrospective training
Share lessons learned with team
Update security awareness materials
Practice improved procedures

8.4 Continuous Monitoring

Post-Incident Monitoring:

Monitor for reoccurrence
Track patch adoption rates
Watch for exploitation attempts
Monitor security researchers' follow-ups
Check for similar vulnerabilities

Metrics Tracking:

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
- Mean Time to Detect (MTTD)
- Mean Time to Respond (MTTR)
- Mean Time to Resolve (MTTR)
- Patch adoption rate
- Number of incidents by severity
- Number of incidents by type
- Effectiveness of mitigations

9. Tools and Resources

9.1 Security Tools

Detection and Monitoring

GitHub Dependabot: Automated dependency vulnerability scanning
CodeQL: Static application security testing (SAST)
Dart/Flutter Security Linters: Code quality and security checks
Snyk: Open source vulnerability scanner (optional)
OWASP Dependency-Check: Dependency vulnerability analysis

Analysis Tools

GitHub Security Advisories: Vulnerability database and disclosure platform
CVE/NVD: Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures database
CVSS Calculator: Severity scoring tool
Git History Tools: For forensic analysis (git log, git blame)

Communication

GitHub Security Advisories: Primary disclosure platform
GitHub Discussions: Community communication
Discord/Slack: Real-time team communication
Email: Direct communication with researchers

Incident Management

GitHub Issues: Private security issues
GitHub Projects: Incident tracking board
Shared Documents: Incident logs (Google Docs/Notion)
Password Manager: Secure credential storage for team

9.2 Reference Materials

Vulnerability Databases

GitHub Advisory Database: https://github.com/advisories
National Vulnerability Database: https://nvd.nist.gov/
CVE: https://cve.mitre.org/
Pub.dev Security Advisories: https://pub.dev/

Security Frameworks

NIST Cybersecurity Framework: https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework
CIS Controls: https://www.cisecurity.org/controls
OWASP Top 10: https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/
OWASP Mobile Top 10: https://owasp.org/www-project-mobile-top-10/

Disclosure Guidelines

ISO/IEC 29147: Vulnerability disclosure
CERT Guide to Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure: https://vuls.cert.org/
Google Project Zero Policy: 90-day disclosure deadline

Legal Resources

GDPR: https://gdpr-info.eu/
CCPA: https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa
Data Breach Notification Laws: State-by-state requirements

9.3 Contact Lists

Internal Contacts

Incident Commander:
- Name: {Lead Maintainer}
- GitHub: @{username}
- Email: {email}
- Phone: {emergency only}

Security Lead:
- Name: {Security-focused maintainer}
- GitHub: @{username}
- Email: {email}

Communications Lead:
- Name: {Communications person}
- GitHub: @{username}
- Email: {email}

External Contacts

GitHub Security Team:
- Email: security@github.com
- Emergency: https://github.com/security

Platform Providers:
- Apple App Store: https://developer.apple.com/contact/
- Pub.dev: security@pub.dev

Legal (if applicable):
- TBD based on organization

Security Community:
- CERT/CC: cert@cert.org
- OpenSSF: security@openssf.org

9.4 Templates and Checklists

Available in Appendices:

Incident response checklist
Security advisory template
Post-incident review template
Communication templates
Severity assessment guide

10. Training and Awareness

10.1 Team Training

Required Training for IR Team:

Incident Response Basics (Annual)
- IRP overview
- Roles and responsibilities
- Communication protocols
- Tools and access
Security Fundamentals (Annual)
- Common vulnerability types
- Secure coding practices
- Threat modeling basics
- Security testing
Tabletop Exercises (Bi-annual)
- Simulated incident scenarios
- Practice response procedures
- Test communication channels
- Identify gaps in plan
Platform-Specific Training (As needed)
- GitHub Security features
- Flutter security best practices
- Dependency management

Training Schedule:

Onboarding: New IR team members
Annual: All IR team members
Quarterly: Security updates and lessons learned
Post-incident: Specific learnings from incidents

10.2 Tabletop Exercise Scenarios

Scenario 1: Critical RCE Vulnerability

SCENARIO: Security researcher reports remote code execution vulnerability
          in template engine. Exploit code is public.

EXERCISE:
- How do we verify the vulnerability?
- What's the appropriate severity?
- What's our patch timeline?
- How do we communicate to users?
- What's our disclosure timeline?

Scenario 2: Compromised Dependency

SCENARIO: A popular dependency has been compromised with malicious code.
          API Dash uses this dependency.

EXERCISE:
- How do we detect this?
- Is API Dash affected?
- What do we tell users?
- How do we remove the dependency?
- Do we need an emergency release?

Scenario 3: Data Breach

SCENARIO: User reports their API credentials were leaked after using API Dash.
          Potentially multiple users affected.

EXERCISE:
- How do we investigate?
- What data might be exposed?
- What are our legal obligations?
- How do we notify affected users?
- What should users do?

Scenario 4: GitHub Account Compromise

SCENARIO: A maintainer's GitHub account is compromised.
          Unauthorized commits are pushed to main branch.

EXERCISE:
- What are immediate actions?
- How do we revoke access?
- What do we audit?
- Do we need to revert commits?
- How do we verify code integrity?

10.3 User Education

Security Best Practices Guide (for users):

# API Dash Security Best Practices

## Protecting Your Credentials
- Use environment variables for sensitive values
- Don't commit credentials to version control
- Regularly rotate API keys and tokens
- Use read-only tokens when possible

## Safe Collection Sharing
- Redact credentials before exporting
- Use encrypted exports for sensitive data
- Review collections before importing
- Trust collection sources

## Keeping Secure
- Always use latest version
- Enable automatic updates
- Watch for security advisories
- Report security issues responsibly

## Local Data Security
- Use full-disk encryption
- Secure your workspace folder
- Clear history containing sensitive data
- Use strong device passwords

Responsible Disclosure Guide (for researchers):

# Reporting Security Vulnerabilities

Thank you for helping keep API Dash secure!

## How to Report
1. **Do NOT** create public GitHub issues
2. Use GitHub Security Advisories (preferred)
3. Or email: security@apidash.dev

## What to Include
- Description of vulnerability
- Steps to reproduce
- Affected versions
- Potential impact
- Suggested fix (optional)

## What to Expect
- Acknowledgment within 24 hours
- Initial assessment within 72 hours
- Regular updates on progress
- Coordinated disclosure timeline
- Credit in advisory (if desired)

## Disclosure Policy
- We follow 90-day disclosure deadline
- Earlier disclosure if fix is ready
- We'll coordinate with you

## Safe Harbor
We will not pursue legal action against researchers who:
- Act in good faith
- Don't access user data
- Don't disrupt service
- Report responsibly

11. Legal and Compliance

11.1 Regulatory Requirements

Data Protection Laws

GDPR (EU):

Breach Notification: 72 hours to supervisory authority
User Notification: Without undue delay if high risk
Documentation: Detailed records of breach
Applicability: If processing EU residents' data

CCPA (California):

Breach Notification: Without unreasonable delay
Content: Specific information requirements
Method: Written notice to affected individuals
Applicability: If processing California residents' data

Other Jurisdictions:

Check applicable data breach notification laws
Consult legal counsel for specific requirements
Maintain list of applicable regulations

Open Source Considerations

Transparency:

Open source projects have unique transparency expectations
Balance between security and openness
Public incident disclosure aligns with open source values

Liability:

Review project license (API Dash likely uses MIT)
Understand warranty disclaimers
Consider liability limitations
Document security efforts

11.2 Legal Contacts

When to Involve Legal Counsel:

Data breaches affecting personal information
Potential regulatory violations
Threats of legal action
Complex liability questions
Law enforcement involvement

Legal Resources:

Open source legal organizations (Software Freedom Conservancy, etc.)
Pro bono legal services for open source
GitHub's legal resources
Local bar associations

11.3 Law Enforcement

When to Contact Law Enforcement:

Criminal activity (hacking, extortion, etc.)
Significant data breach
Identity theft concerns
Ongoing attacks

What to Provide:

Incident summary
Timeline of events
Evidence preservation
Technical details
Impact assessment

Coordination:

Designate single point of contact
Preserve evidence chain of custody
Get case number for reference
Balance investigation with incident response

11.4 Insurance

Cyber Insurance Considerations:

Most applicable for commercial entities
Open source projects typically lack coverage
Document security practices for potential future coverage
Understand requirements if organization obtains coverage

12. Plan Maintenance

12.1 Review Schedule

Regular Reviews:

Annual: Comprehensive plan review and update
Quarterly: Metrics review and process improvements
Post-Incident: Review and update based on learnings
After Major Changes: Review when project structure changes

Review Checklist:

[ ] Update contact information
[ ] Review and update procedures
[ ] Validate tool access
[ ] Check compliance requirements
[ ] Update templates
[ ] Review metrics and KPIs
[ ] Incorporate lessons learned
[ ] Test communication channels
[ ] Verify escalation paths
[ ] Update training materials

12.2 Change Management

Plan Updates:

Version control this document
Track changes in git history
Communicate significant changes to team
Train team on major procedural updates

Approval Process:

Minor updates: Security Lead approval
Major updates: Incident Commander + team consensus
Emergency updates: Incident Commander approval, team notification

Change Log:

| Version | Date | Changes | Approved By |
|---------|------|---------|-------------|
| 1.0 | 2025-12-04 | Initial IRP | IC |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

12.3 Testing and Validation

Plan Testing:

Annual Tabletop Exercise: Full scenario walkthrough
Quarterly Mini-Exercise: Specific procedure testing
Post-Update Testing: Validate changes work as intended

Validation Criteria:

All contacts are current
All tools are accessible
Procedures are clear and actionable
Templates are complete
Team understands roles

12.4 Continuous Improvement

Improvement Sources:

Post-incident reviews
Tabletop exercises
Industry best practices
Regulatory changes
Tool updates
Team feedback

Metrics for Success:

Reduced time to detect
Reduced time to respond
Reduced time to resolve
Increased patch adoption
Improved team confidence
Positive community feedback

13. Appendices

Appendix A: Quick Reference Card

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║        API DASH INCIDENT RESPONSE QUICK GUIDE           ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ CRITICAL INCIDENT?                                       ║
║   → Contact Incident Commander IMMEDIATELY               ║
║   → Create private GitHub Security Advisory              ║
║   → Do NOT discuss publicly                              ║
║                                                          ║
║ RESPONSE TIMES:                                          ║
║   Critical:  4 hours                                     ║
║   High:      24 hours                                    ║
║   Medium:    72 hours                                    ║
║   Low:       1 week                                      ║
║                                                          ║
║ SEVERITY GUIDE:                                          ║
║   🔴 Critical: RCE, Supply chain, Mass credential leak   ║
║   🟠 High:     Auth bypass, Privilege escalation         ║
║   🟡 Medium:   Info disclosure, CSRF, DoS                ║
║   🟢 Low:      Minor info leak, Security misconfig       ║
║                                                          ║
║ CONTACTS:                                                ║
║   Security: security@apidash.dev                         ║
║   GitHub:   Security Advisories (preferred)              ║
║   Discord:  #security channel                            ║
║                                                          ║
║ REMEMBER:                                                ║
║   ✓ Preserve evidence                                    ║
║   ✓ Document everything                                  ║
║   ✓ Communicate regularly                                ║
║   ✓ Learn and improve                                    ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

Appendix B: Incident Response Checklist

Phase 1: Detection

[ ] Incident detected/reported
[ ] Initial assessment completed
[ ] Incident Commander notified
[ ] Preliminary severity assigned
[ ] Private GHSA created (if needed)
[ ] Team activated

Phase 2: Analysis

[ ] Vulnerability validated
[ ] Affected versions identified
[ ] Attack vectors documented
[ ] Impact assessed
[ ] Root cause determined
[ ] Final severity assigned
[ ] CVSS score calculated

Phase 3: Containment

[ ] Immediate threats neutralized
[ ] Access revoked (if compromise)
[ ] Temporary workarounds identified
[ ] Users warned (if critical)
[ ] Evidence preserved
[ ] Monitoring enhanced

Phase 4: Eradication

[ ] Security fix developed
[ ] Fix tested thoroughly
[ ] Code reviewed
[ ] Regression tests added
[ ] Documentation updated
[ ] Similar issues checked

Phase 5: Recovery

[ ] Patch released
[ ] Security advisory published
[ ] Users notified
[ ] Distribution channels updated
[ ] Fix verified effective
[ ] Monitoring continued

Phase 6: Post-Incident

[ ] PIR scheduled
[ ] Incident documented
[ ] Lessons learned captured
[ ] Action items assigned
[ ] Plan updated
[ ] Training updated
[ ] Metrics recorded

Appendix C: Communication Templates

See Section 6 for detailed templates

Appendix D: CVSS Scoring Guide

CVSS v3.1 Quick Reference:

Base Metrics:

Attack Vector (AV): Network/Adjacent/Local/Physical
Attack Complexity (AC): Low/High
Privileges Required (PR): None/Low/High
User Interaction (UI): None/Required
Scope (S): Unchanged/Changed
Confidentiality Impact (C): None/Low/High
Integrity Impact (I): None/Low/High
Availability Impact (A): None/Low/High

Calculator: https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1

Example Scoring:

Remote Code Execution:
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Score: 10.0 (CRITICAL)

Stored XSS:
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Score: 5.4 (MEDIUM)

Appendix E: Useful Commands

Git Forensics:

# View commit history for file
git log --follow --all -- path/to/file

# See who changed specific lines
git blame path/to/file

# Find when vulnerability was introduced
git bisect start
git bisect bad  # Current broken state
git bisect good v1.0.0  # Known good version

# Check if specific code exists in all branches
git grep "suspicious_function" $(git rev-list --all)

# Revert specific commits
git revert <commit-hash>

Security Scanning:

# Check for dependency vulnerabilities
dart pub outdated --mode security

# Run static analysis
flutter analyze

# Check for secrets in code (using gitleaks)
gitleaks detect --source .

# Audit npm packages (if using web)
npm audit

# Check license compliance
flutter pub deps --style=compact

Incident Response:

# Create branch for security fix
git checkout -b security/fix-cve-2025-xxxx

# Create signed commit
git commit -S -m "security: fix vulnerability"

# Create signed tag for release
git tag -s v1.2.3 -m "Security release v1.2.3"

# Verify signature
git verify-tag v1.2.3

Appendix F: Acronyms and Definitions

Acronyms:

IRP: Incident Response Plan
IR: Incident Response
IC: Incident Commander
PIR: Post-Incident Review
GHSA: GitHub Security Advisory
CVE: Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures
CVSS: Common Vulnerability Scoring System
RCE: Remote Code Execution
XSS: Cross-Site Scripting
CSRF: Cross-Site Request Forgery
DoS: Denial of Service
SAST: Static Application Security Testing
DAST: Dynamic Application Security Testing
SBOM: Software Bill of Materials

Definitions:

Security Incident: Any event that poses a threat to confidentiality, integrity, or availability
Vulnerability: A weakness that can be exploited
Exploit: Code or technique that takes advantage of a vulnerability
Patch: Update that fixes a security issue
Advisory: Public notification of security issue and fix
Disclosure: Process of revealing vulnerability details
Coordinated Disclosure: Vulnerability disclosure coordinated with vendor

Appendix G: External Resources

Security Organizations:

OWASP: https://owasp.org/
CERT/CC: https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/
Open Source Security Foundation: https://openssf.org/
GitHub Security Lab: https://securitylab.github.com/

Reporting Platforms:

HackerOne: https://hackerone.com/
Bugcrowd: https://bugcrowd.com/
GitHub Security Advisories: Built into GitHub

Learning Resources:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework: https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework
SANS Incident Response: https://www.sans.org/incident-response/
Google Project Zero: https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/

Document Control

Version	Date	Author	Changes	Approved By
1.0	December 2025	Security Team	Initial IRP based on 2025 guidelines	Incident Commander

Next Review Date: December 2026
Document Owner: API Dash Security Team
Classification: Public
Distribution: All maintainers, published in repository

Acknowledgments

This Incident Response Plan is based on industry best practices and frameworks including:

NIST Computer Security Incident Handling Guide (SP 800-61 Rev. 2)
SANS Incident Handler's Handbook
ISO/IEC 27035 Incident Management
CERT Coordination Center practices
OWASP Incident Response guidelines
GitHub Security best practices
Open Source Security Foundation recommendations

Special thanks to the security community for their guidance and the API Dash contributors for their commitment to security.

For security incidents or questions about this plan:
📧 security@apidash.dev
🔒 GitHub Security Advisories: https://github.com/foss42/apidash/security/advisories
💬 Discord: #security channel

END OF INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN

54 KiB Raw Blame History

Incident Response Plan (IRP) for API Dash

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

Key Objectives

Incident Response Goals (2025 Standards)

2. Purpose and Scope

2.1 Purpose

2.2 Scope

2.3 Applicability

3. Incident Response Team

3.1 Core Team Structure

3.1.1 Incident Commander (IC)

3.1.2 Security Lead

3.1.3 Communications Lead

3.1.4 Technical Lead

3.1.5 Documentation Lead

3.2 Extended Team

3.3 Contact Information

4. Incident Classification and Severity

4.1 Severity Levels (Aligned with CVSS 3.1)

CRITICAL (CVSS 9.0-10.0)

HIGH (CVSS 7.0-8.9)

MEDIUM (CVSS 4.0-6.9)

LOW (CVSS 0.1-3.9)

4.2 Incident Categories

4.3 Impact Assessment Factors

5. Incident Response Lifecycle

5.1 Phase 1: Preparation

Ongoing Activities

5.2 Phase 2: Detection and Analysis

Step 1: Incident Detection

Step 2: Initial Triage

Step 3: Detailed Analysis

5.3 Phase 3: Containment

Short-term Containment

Long-term Containment

5.4 Phase 4: Eradication

Root Cause Elimination

5.5 Phase 5: Recovery

Release and Deployment

Verification

5.6 Phase 6: Post-Incident Activities

6. Communication Plan

6.1 Communication Principles

6.2 Internal Communication

During Active Incident

6.3 External Communication

Communication to Security Researchers

Communication to Users

6.4 Media and Public Relations

7. Incident Types and Response Procedures

7.1 Code Vulnerability

7.2 Dependency Vulnerability

7.3 Supply Chain Attack

7.4 Data Breach

7.5 Infrastructure Compromise

7.6 Malicious Code Contribution

8. Post-Incident Activities

8.1 Post-Incident Review (PIR)

8.2 Documentation

8.3 Improvement Actions

8.4 Continuous Monitoring

9. Tools and Resources

9.1 Security Tools

Detection and Monitoring

Analysis Tools

Communication

Incident Management

9.2 Reference Materials

Vulnerability Databases

Security Frameworks

Disclosure Guidelines

Legal Resources

9.3 Contact Lists

Internal Contacts

External Contacts

9.4 Templates and Checklists

10. Training and Awareness

10.1 Team Training

54 KiB

Raw Blame History