mirror of
https://github.com/espressif/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-07-28 20:34:54 +08:00
5f3356899d
When running test-case gdb.cp/step-and-next-inline.exp with gcc-11, I run into: ... KPASS: gdb.cp/step-and-next-inline.exp: no_header: next step 1 \ (PRMS symtab/25507) FAIL: gdb.cp/step-and-next-inline.exp: no_header: next step 2 KPASS: gdb.cp/step-and-next-inline.exp: no_header: next step 3 \ (PRMS symtab/25507) ... [ Note that I get the same result with gcc-11 and target board unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gdwarf-4, so this is not a dwarf 4 vs 5 issue. ] With gcc-10, I have this trace: ... 64 get_alias_set (&xx); get_alias_set (t=0x601038 <xx>) at step-and-next-inline.cc:51 51 if (t != NULL 40 if (t->x != i) 52 && TREE_TYPE (t).z != 1 43 return x; 53 && TREE_TYPE (t).z != 2 43 return x; 54 && TREE_TYPE (t).z != 3) 43 return x; main () at step-and-next-inline.cc:65 65 return 0; ... and with gcc-11, I have instead: ... 64 get_alias_set (&xx); get_alias_set (t=0x601038 <xx>) at step-and-next-inline.cc:51 51 if (t != NULL 52 && TREE_TYPE (t).z != 1 43 return x; 53 && TREE_TYPE (t).z != 2 43 return x; 54 && TREE_TYPE (t).z != 3) 43 return x; main () at step-and-next-inline.cc:65 65 return 0; ... and with clang-10, I have instead: ... 64 get_alias_set (&xx); get_alias_set (t=0x601034 <xx>) at step-and-next-inline.cc:51 51 if (t != NULL 52 && TREE_TYPE (t).z != 1 53 && TREE_TYPE (t).z != 2 54 && TREE_TYPE (t).z != 3) 51 if (t != NULL 57 } main () at step-and-next-inline.cc:65 65 return 0; ... The test-case tries to verify that we don't step into inlined function tree_check (lines 40-43) (so, with the clang trace we get that right). The test-case then tries to kfail the problems when using gcc, but this is done in such a way that the testing still gets out of sync after a failure. That is: the "next step 2" check that is supposed to match "TREE_TYPE (t).z != 2" is actually matching "TREE_TYPE (t).z != 1": ... (gdb) next^M 52 && TREE_TYPE (t).z != 1^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.cp/step-and-next-inline.exp: no_header: next step 2 ... Fix this by issuing extra nexts to arrive at the required lines. Tested on x86_64-linux, with gcc-8, gcc-9, gcc-10, gcc-11, clang-8, clang-10 and clang-12. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2021-07-20 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> * gdb.cp/step-and-next-inline.cc (tree_check, get_alias_set, main): Tag closing brace with comment. * gdb.cp/step-and-next-inline.h: Update to keep identical with step-and-next-inline.cc. * gdb.cp/step-and-next-inline.exp: Issue extra next when required.
39 lines
1.1 KiB
C
39 lines
1.1 KiB
C
/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
|
|
|
|
Copyright 2019-2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
|
|
|
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
|
|
(at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
|
|
|
|
/* The code below must remain identical to the block of code in
|
|
step-and-next-inline.cc. */
|
|
|
|
#include <stdlib.h>
|
|
|
|
struct tree
|
|
{
|
|
volatile int x;
|
|
volatile int z;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
#define TREE_TYPE(NODE) (*tree_check (NODE, 0))
|
|
|
|
inline tree *
|
|
tree_check (tree *t, int i)
|
|
{
|
|
if (t->x != i)
|
|
abort();
|
|
tree *x = t;
|
|
return x;
|
|
} // tree_check
|