This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script,
which automated the update of the copyright year range for all
source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include
year 2023.
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
This commits the result of running gdb/copyright.py as per our Start
of New Year procedure...
gdb/ChangeLog
Update copyright year range in copyright header of all GDB files.
This commit applies all changes made after running the gdb/copyright.py
script.
Note that one file was flagged by the script, due to an invalid
copyright header
(gdb/unittests/basic_string_view/element_access/char/empty.cc).
As the file was copied from GCC's libstdc++-v3 testsuite, this commit
leaves this file untouched for the time being; a patch to fix the header
was sent to gcc-patches first.
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
PR rust/21484 notes that watch -location does not work with Rust:
(gdb) watch -location a
syntax error in expression, near `) 0x00007fffffffe0f4'.
update_watchpoint tries to tell gdb that the new expression it creates
has C syntax:
/* The above expression is in C. */
b->language = language_c;
However, update_watchpoint doesn't actually use this language when
re-parsing the expression.
Originally I was going to fix this by saving and restoring the
language in update_watchpoint, but this regressed
gdb.dlang/watch-loc.exp, because the constructed expression actually
has D syntax (specifically the name is not parseable by C).
Next I looked at directly constructing an expression, and not relying
on the parser at all; but it seemed to me that upon a re-set, we'd
want to reparse the type, and there is no existing API to do this
correctly.
So, in the end I made a hook to let each language choose what
expression to use. I made all the languages other than Rust use the C
expression, because that is the status quo ante. However, this is
probably not truly correct. After this patch, at least, it is easy to
correct by someone who knows the language(s) in question.
Regtested by the buildbot.
ChangeLog
2017-05-19 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR rust/21484:
* rust-lang.c (exp_descriptor_rust): New function.
(rust_language_defn): Use it.
* p-lang.c (pascal_language_defn): Update.
* opencl-lang.c (opencl_language_defn): Update.
* objc-lang.c (objc_language_defn): Update.
* m2-lang.c (m2_language_defn): Update.
* language.h (struct language_defn)
<la_watch_location_expression>: New member.
* language.c (unknown_language_defn, auto_language_defn)
(local_language_defn): Update.
* go-lang.c (go_language_defn): Update.
* f-lang.c (f_language_defn): Update.
* d-lang.c (d_language_defn): Update.
* c-lang.h (c_watch_location_expression): Declare.
* c-lang.c (c_watch_location_expression): New function.
(c_language_defn, cplus_language_defn, asm_language_defn)
(minimal_language_defn): Use it.
* breakpoint.c (watch_command_1): Call
la_watch_location_expression.
* ada-lang.c (ada_language_defn): Update.
testsuite/ChangeLog
2017-05-19 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR rust/21484:
* gdb.rust/watch.exp: New file.
* gdb.rust/watch.rs: New file.
