This moves the follow_static_link function to frame.c and exports it
for use elsewhere. The API is changed slightly to make it more
generically useful.
(cherry picked from commit 19b83d5c9bac1db207dce26859c6ca84135615b0)
This adds a couple of convenience methods, block::is_static_block and
block::is_global_block.
(cherry picked from commit edf1b9640bbc981c8a094d6ca29d444b1ed50a2c)
I noticed a comment by an include and remembered that I think these
don't really provide much value -- sometimes they are just editorial,
and sometimes they are obsolete. I think it's better to just remove
them. Tested by rebuilding.
Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
This converts block_static_block and block_global_block to be methods.
This was mostly written by script. It was simpler to convert them at
the same time because they're often used near each other.
This removes deprecated_lval_hack and the VALUE_LVAL macro, replacing
all uses with a call to value::lval.
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
This introduces the set_lval method on value, one step toward removing
deprecated_lval_hack. Ultimately I think the goal should be for some
of these set_* methods to be replaced with constructors; but I haven't
done this, as the series is already too long. Other 'deprecated'
methods can probably be handled the same way.
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
This patch turns a grab bag of value functions to methods of value.
These are done together because their implementations are
interrelated.
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
This turns many functions that are related to optimized-out or
availability-checking to be methods of value. The static function
value_entirely_covered_by_range_vector is also converted to be a
private method.
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
This changes value_fetch_lazy to be a method of value. A few helper
functions are converted as well, to avoid problems in later patches
when the data members are all made private.
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
This turns value_contents_raw, value_contents_writeable, and
value_contents_all_raw into methods on value. The remaining functions
will be changed later in the series; they were a bit trickier and so I
didn't include them in this patch.
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
This changes allocate_value_lazy to be a static "constructor" of
struct value.
I considered trying to change value to use ordinary new/delete, but it
seems to me that due to reference counting, we may someday want to
change these static constructors to return value_ref_ptr instead.
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script,
which automated the update of the copyright year range for all
source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include
year 2023.
When the source program contains a goto label, it turns out it's
actually pretty hard for a user to find out more about that label.
For example:
(gdb) p some_label
No symbol "some_label" in current context.
(gdb) disassemble some_label
No symbol "some_label" in current context.
(gdb) x/10i some_label
No symbol "some_label" in current context.
(gdb) break some_label
Breakpoint 2 at 0x401135: file /tmp/py-label-symbol-value.c, line 35.
In all cases, some_label is a goto label within the current frame.
Only placing a breakpoint on the label worked.
This all seems a little strange to me, it feels like asking about a
goto label would not be an unreasonable thing for a user to do.
This commit doesn't fix any of the above issues, I mention them just
to provide a little context for why the following issue has probably
not been seen before.
It turns out there is one way a user can access the symbol for a goto
label, through the Python API:
python frame = gdb.selected_frame()
python frame_pc = frame.pc()
python block = gdb.current_progspace().block_for_pc(frame_pc)
python symbol,_ = gdb.lookup_symbol('some_label', block, gdb.SYMBOL_LABEL_DOMAIN)
python print(str(symbol.value()))
../../src/gdb/findvar.c:204: internal-error: store_typed_address: Assertion `type->is_pointer_or_reference ()' failed.
The problem is that label symbols are created using the
builtin_core_addr type, which is a pure integer type.
When GDB tries to fetch the value of a label symbol then we end up in
findvar.c, in the function language_defn::read_var_value, in the
LOC_LABEL case. From here store_typed_address is called to store the
address of the label into a value object with builtin_core_addr type.
The problem is that store_typed_address requires that the destination
type be a pointer or reference, which the builtin_core_addr type is
not.
Now it's not clear what type a goto label address should have, but
GCC has an extension that allows users to take the address of a goto
label (using &&), in that case the result is of type 'void *'.
I propose that when we convert the CORE_ADDR value to a GDB value
object, we use builtin_func_ptr type instead of builtin_core_addr,
this means the result will be of type 'void (*) ()'. The benefit of
this approach is that when gdbarch_address_to_pointer is called the
target type will be correctly identified as a pointer to code, which
should mean any architecture specific adjustments are done correctly.
We can then cast the new value to 'void *' type with a call to
value_cast_pointer, this should not change the values bit
representation, but will just update the type.
After this asking for the value of a label symbol works just fine:
(gdb) python print(str(symbol.value()))
0x401135 <main+35>
And the type is maybe what we'd expect:
(gdb) python print(str(symbol.value().type))
void *
Spotted a couple of places in findvar.c where we use:
if ( ! CONDITION )
internal_error ("...");
this commit changes these to be:
gdb_assert ( CONDITION );
which I think is better.
Unless we happen to hit the internal_error calls (which was bad) there
should be no user visible changes after this commit.
Currently, every internal_error call must be passed __FILE__/__LINE__
explicitly, like:
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, "foo %d", var);
The need to pass in explicit __FILE__/__LINE__ is there probably
because the function predates widespread and portable variadic macros
availability. We can use variadic macros nowadays, and in fact, we
already use them in several places, including the related
gdb_assert_not_reached.
So this patch renames the internal_error function to something else,
and then reimplements internal_error as a variadic macro that expands
__FILE__/__LINE__ itself.
The result is that we now should call internal_error like so:
internal_error ("foo %d", var);
Likewise for internal_warning.
The patch adjusts all calls sites. 99% of the adjustments were done
with a perl/sed script.
The non-mechanical changes are in gdbsupport/errors.h,
gdbsupport/gdb_assert.h, and gdb/gdbarch.py.
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Change-Id: Ia6f372c11550ca876829e8fd85048f4502bdcf06
This changes GDB to use frame_info_ptr instead of frame_info *
The substitution was done with multiple sequential `sed` commands:
sed 's/^struct frame_info;/class frame_info_ptr;/'
sed 's/struct frame_info \*/frame_info_ptr /g' - which left some
issues in a few files, that were manually fixed.
sed 's/\<frame_info \*/frame_info_ptr /g'
sed 's/frame_info_ptr $/frame_info_ptr/g' - used to remove whitespace
problems.
The changed files were then manually checked and some 'sed' changes
undone, some constructors and some gets were added, according to what
made sense, and what Tromey originally did
Co-Authored-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
Approved-by: Tom Tomey <tom@tromey.com>
A rather straightforward patch to change an instance of callback +
void pointer to gdb::function_view, allowing pasing lambdas that
capture, and eliminating the need for the untyped pointer.
Change-Id: I73ed644e7849945265a2c763f79f5456695b0037
Add a getter and a setter for a symbol's type. Remove the corresponding
macro and adjust all callers.
Change-Id: Ie1a137744c5bfe1df4d4f9ae5541c5299577c8de
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
I think it would make sense for extract_integer, extract_signed_integer
and extract_unsigned_integer to take an array_view. This way, when we
extract an integer, we can validate that we don't overflow the buffer
passed by the caller (e.g. ask to extract a 4-byte integer but pass a
2-byte buffer).
- Change extract_integer to take an array_view
- Add overloads of extract_signed_integer and extract_unsigned_integer
that take array_views. Keep the existing versions so we don't
need to change all callers, but make them call the array_view
versions.
This shortens some places like:
result = extract_unsigned_integer (value_contents (result_val).data (),
TYPE_LENGTH (value_type (result_val)),
byte_order);
into
result = extract_unsigned_integer (value_contents (result_val), byte_order);
value_contents returns an array view that is of length
`TYPE_LENGTH (value_type (result_val))` already, so the length is
implicitly communicated through the array view.
Change-Id: Ic1c1f98c88d5c17a8486393af316f982604d6c95
Change gdb_assert_not_reached to accept a format string plus
corresponding arguments. This allows giving more precise messages.
Because the format string passed by the caller is prepended with a "%s:"
to add the function name, the callers can no longer pass a translated
string (`_(...)`). Make the gdb_assert_not_reached include the _(),
just like the gdb_assert_fail macro just above.
Change-Id: Id0cfda5a57979df6cdaacaba0d55dd91ae9efee7
The bug fixed by this [1] patch was caused by an out-of-bounds access to
a value's content. The code gets the value's content (just a pointer)
and then indexes it with a non-sensical index.
This made me think of changing functions that return value contents to
return array_views instead of a plain pointer. This has the advantage
that when GDB is built with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG, accesses to the array_view
are checked, making bugs more apparent / easier to find.
This patch changes the return types of these functions, and updates
callers to call .data() on the result, meaning it's not changing
anything in practice. Additional work will be needed (which can be done
little by little) to make callers propagate the use of array_view and
reap the benefits.
[1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-September/182306.html
Change-Id: I5151f888f169e1c36abe2cbc57620110673816f3
I noticed that pointer_type is declared in language.h and defined in
language.c. However, it really has to do with types, so it should
have been in gdbtypes.h all along.
This patch changes it to be a method on struct type. And, I went
through uses of TYPE_IS_REFERENCE and updated many spots to use the
new method as well. (I didn't update ones that were in arch-specific
code, as I couldn't readily test that.)
This commits the result of running gdb/copyright.py as per our Start
of New Year procedure...
gdb/ChangeLog
Update copyright year range in copyright header of all GDB files.
This started with me running into the bug described in python/22748,
in summary, if the frame sniffing code accessed any registers within
an inline frame then GDB would crash with this error:
gdb/frame.c:579: internal-error: frame_id get_frame_id(frame_info*): Assertion `fi->level == 0' failed.
The problem is that, when in the Python unwinder I write this:
pending_frame.read_register ("register-name")
This is translated internally into a call to `value_of_register',
which in turn becomes a call to `value_of_register_lazy'.
Usually this isn't a problem, `value_of_register_lazy' requires the
next frame (more inner) to have a valid frame_id, which will be the
case (if we're sniffing frame #1, then frame #0 will have had its
frame-id figured out).
Unfortunately if frame #0 is inline within frame #1, then the frame-id
for frame #0 can't be computed until we have the frame-id for #1. As
a result we can't create a lazy register for frame #1 when frame #0 is
inline.
Initially I proposed a solution inline with that proposed in bugzilla,
changing value_of_register to avoid creating a lazy register value.
However, when this was discussed on the mailing list I got this reply:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-June/169633.html
Which led me to look at these two patches:
[1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-April/167612.html
[2] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-April/167930.html
When I considered patches [1] and [2] I saw that all of the issues
being addressed here were related, and that there was a single
solution that could address all of these issues.
First I wrote the new test gdb.opt/inline-frame-tailcall.exp, which
shows that [1] and [2] regress the inline tail-call unwinder, the
reason for this is that these two patches replace a call to
gdbarch_unwind_pc with a call to get_frame_register, however, this is
not correct. The previous call to gdbarch_unwind_pc takes THIS_FRAME
and returns the $pc value in the previous frame. In contrast
get_frame_register takes THIS_FRAME and returns the value of the $pc
in THIS_FRAME; these calls are not equivalent.
The reason these patches appear (or do) fix the regressions listed in
[1] is that the tail call sniffer depends on identifying the address
of a caller and a callee, GDB then looks for a tail-call sequence that
takes us from the caller address to the callee, if such a series is
found then tail-call frames are added.
The bug that was being hit, and which was address in patch [1] is that
in order to find the address of the caller, GDB ended up creating a
lazy register value for an inline frame with to frame-id. The
solution in patch [1] is to instead take the address of the callee and
treat this as the address of the caller. Getting the address of the
callee works, but we then end up looking for a tail-call series from
the callee to the callee, which obviously doesn't return any sane
results, so we don't insert any tail call frames.
The original patch [1] did cause some breakage, so patch [2] undid
patch [1] in all cases except those where we had an inline frame with
no frame-id. It just so happens that there were no tests that fitted
this description _and_ which required tail-call frames to be
successfully spotted, as a result patch [2] appeared to work.
The new test inline-frame-tailcall.exp, exposes the flaw in patch [2].
This commit undoes patch [1] and [2], and replaces them with a new
solution, which is also different to the solution proposed in the
python/22748 bug report.
In this solution I propose that we introduce some special case logic
to value_of_register_lazy. To understand what this logic is we must
first look at how inline frames unwind registers, this is very simple,
they do this:
static struct value *
inline_frame_prev_register (struct frame_info *this_frame,
void **this_cache, int regnum)
{
return get_frame_register_value (this_frame, regnum);
}
And remember:
struct value *
get_frame_register_value (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum)
{
return frame_unwind_register_value (frame->next, regnum);
}
So in all cases, unwinding a register in an inline frame just asks the
next frame to unwind the register, this makes sense, as an inline
frame doesn't really exist, when we unwind a register in an inline
frame, we're really just asking the next frame for the value of the
register in the previous, non-inline frame.
So, if we assume that we only get into the missing frame-id situation
when we try to unwind a register from an inline frame during the frame
sniffing process, then we can change value_of_register_lazy to not
create lazy register values for an inline frame.
Imagine this stack setup, where #1 is inline within #2.
#3 -> #2 -> #1 -> #0
\______/
inline
Now when trying to figure out the frame-id for #1, we need to compute
the frame-id for #2. If the frame sniffer for #2 causes a lazy
register read in #2, either due to a Python Unwinder, or for the
tail-call sniffer, then we call value_of_register_lazy passing in
frame #2.
In value_of_register_lazy, we grab the next frame, which is #1, and we
used to then ask for the frame-id of #1, which was not computed, and
this was our bug.
Now, I propose we spot that #1 is an inline frame, and so lookup the
next frame of #1, which is #0. As #0 is not inline it will have a
valid frame-id, and so we create a lazy register value using #0 as the
next-frame-id. This will give us the exact same result we had
previously (thanks to the code we inspected above).
Encoding into value_of_register_lazy the knowledge that reading an
inline frame register will always just forward to the next frame
feels.... not ideal, but this seems like the cleanest solution to this
recursive frame-id computation/sniffing issue that appears to crop
up.
The following two commits are fully reverted with this commit, these
correspond to patches [1] and [2] respectively:
commit 5939967b355ba6a940887d19847b7893a4506067
Date: Tue Apr 14 17:26:22 2020 -0300
Fix inline frame unwinding breakage
commit 991a3e2e9944a4b3a27bd989ac03c18285bd545d
Date: Sat Apr 25 00:32:44 2020 -0300
Fix remaining inline/tailcall unwinding breakage for x86_64
gdb/ChangeLog:
PR python/22748
* dwarf2/frame-tailcall.c (dwarf2_tailcall_sniffer_first): Remove
special handling for inline frames.
* findvar.c (value_of_register_lazy): Skip inline frames when
creating lazy register values.
* frame.c (frame_id_computed_p): Delete definition.
* frame.h (frame_id_computed_p): Delete declaration.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR python/22748
* gdb.opt/inline-frame-tailcall.c: New file.
* gdb.opt/inline-frame-tailcall.exp: New file.
* gdb.python/py-unwind-inline.c: New file.
* gdb.python/py-unwind-inline.exp: New file.
* gdb.python/py-unwind-inline.py: New file.
This commit changes the language_data::la_read_var_value function
pointer member variable into a member function of language_defn.
An interesting aspect of this change is that the implementation of
language_defn::read_var_value is actually in findvar.c. This is
partly historical, the new language_defn::read_var_value is a rename
of default_read_var_value, which was already in that file, but also,
that is the file that contains the helper functions needed by the
read_var_value method, so it makes sens that the method implementation
should continue to live there (I think).
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* ada-lang.c (ada_read_var_value): Delete function, move
implementation to...
(ada_language::read_var_value): ...here.
(ada_language_data): Delete la_read_var_value initializer.
* c-lang.c (c_language_data): Likewise.
(cplus_language_data): Likewise.
(minimal_language_data): Likewise.
* d-lang.c (d_language_data): Likewise.
* f-lang.c (f_language_data): Likewise.
* findvar.c (default_read_var_value): Rename to...
(language_defn::read_var_value): ...this.
* findvar.c (read_var_value): Update header comment, and change to
call member function instead of function pointer.
* go-lang.c (go_language_data): Likewise.
* language.c (unknown_language_data): Delete la_read_var_value
initializer.
(auto_language_data): Likewise.
* language.h (struct language_data): Delete la_read_var_value
field.
(language_defn::read_var_value): New member function.
(default_read_var_value): Delete declaration.
* m2-lang.c (m2_language_data): Delete la_read_var_value
initializer.
* objc-lang.c (objc_language_data): Likewise.
* opencl-lang.c (opencl_language_data): Likewise.
* p-lang.c (pascal_language_data): Likewise.
* rust-lang.c (rust_language_data): Likewise.
* value.h (default_read_var_value): Delete declaration.
Remove TYPE_CODE, changing all the call sites to use type::code
directly. This is quite a big diff, but this was mostly done using sed
and coccinelle. A few call sites were done by hand.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* gdbtypes.h (TYPE_CODE): Remove. Change all call sites to use
type::code instead.
When evaluating a DWARF expression, the dynamic type resolution code
will pass in a buffer of bytes via the property_addr_info. However,
the DWARF expression evaluator will then proceed to read memory from
the inferior, even when the request could be filled from this buffer.
This, in turn, is a problem in some cases; and specifically when
trying to handle the Ada scenario of extracting a variable-length
value from a packed array. Here, the ordinary DWARF expression cannot
be directly evaluated, because the data may appear at some arbitrary
bit offset. So, it is unpacked into a staging area and then the
expression is evaluated -- using an address of 0.
This patch fixes the problem by arranging for the DWARF evaluator, in
this case, to prefer passed-in memory when possible. The type of the
buffer in the property_addr_info is changed to an array_view so that
bounds checking can be done.
gdb/ChangeLog
2020-04-24 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
* ada-lang.c (ada_discrete_type_high_bound, ada_discrete_type_low)
(ada_value_primitive_packed_val): Update.
* ada-valprint.c (ada_value_print_1): Update.
* dwarf2/loc.c (evaluate_for_locexpr_baton): New struct.
(dwarf2_locexpr_baton_eval): Take a property_addr_info rather than
just an address. Use evaluate_for_locexpr_baton.
(dwarf2_evaluate_property): Update.
* dwarf2/loc.h (struct property_addr_info) <valaddr>: Now an
array_view.
* findvar.c (default_read_var_value): Update.
* gdbtypes.c (compute_variant_fields_inner)
(resolve_dynamic_type_internal): Update.
(resolve_dynamic_type): Change type of valaddr parameter.
* gdbtypes.h (resolve_dynamic_type): Update.
* valarith.c (value_subscripted_rvalue): Update.
* value.c (value_from_contents_and_address): Update.
