Fix spelling mistakes.

This commit is contained in:
Nick Clifton
2011-06-02 13:43:24 +00:00
parent 4c422395e6
commit cc643b88f1
48 changed files with 6145 additions and 4684 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2011-06-02 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
* common.h: Fix spelling mistake in comment.
* reloc-macros.h: Likewise.
2011-05-31 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
* arm.h (arm_st_branch_type): Add ST_BRANCH_UNKNOWN.

View File

@ -159,7 +159,7 @@
#define EM_MMA 54 /* Fujitsu Multimedia Accelerator */
#define EM_PCP 55 /* Siemens PCP */
#define EM_NCPU 56 /* Sony nCPU embedded RISC processor */
#define EM_NDR1 57 /* Denso NDR1 microprocesspr */
#define EM_NDR1 57 /* Denso NDR1 microprocessor */
#define EM_STARCORE 58 /* Motorola Star*Core processor */
#define EM_ME16 59 /* Toyota ME16 processor */
#define EM_ST100 60 /* STMicroelectronics ST100 processor */

View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* Generic relocation support for BFD.
Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2003, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2003, 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of BFD, the Binary File Descriptor library.
@ -45,10 +45,10 @@
Note: The value of the symbol defined in the END_RELOC_NUMBERS
macro (R_foo_count in the case of the example above) will be
set to the value of the whichever *_RELOC macro preceeds it plus
set to the value of the whichever *_RELOC macro precedes it plus
one. Therefore if you intend to use the symbol as a sentinel for
the highest valid macro value you should make sure that the
preceeding *_RELOC macro is the highest valid number. ie a
preceding *_RELOC macro is the highest valid number. ie a
declaration like this:
START_RELOC_NUMBERS (foo)