espressif/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/espressif/binutils-gdb.git synced 2025-06-20 09:58:19 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

* infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Remove short-circuit code for

Browse Source 
events in a different thread.
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-09 16:40:08 +00:00
parent 333dabeb90
commit b40c7d58b1
2 changed files with 7 additions and 54 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
gdb/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2004-03-09 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Remove short-circuit code for
events in a different thread.
2004-03-09 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> 2004-03-09 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* target.c (debug_to_xfer_memory): If targetdebug is 1, don't * target.c (debug_to_xfer_memory): If targetdebug is 1, don't

56
gdb/infrun.c
View File

@ -1883,61 +1883,9 @@ handle_inferior_event (struct execution_control_state *ecs)
ecs->random_signal = 1; ecs->random_signal = 1;
/* See if something interesting happened to the non-current thread. If /* See if something interesting happened to the non-current thread. If
so, then switch to that thread, and eventually give control back to so, then switch to that thread. */
the user. if (!ptid_equal (ecs->ptid, inferior_ptid))
Note that if there's any kind of pending follow (i.e., of a fork,
vfork or exec), we don't want to do this now. Rather, we'll let
the next resume handle it. */
if (!ptid_equal (ecs->ptid, inferior_ptid) &&
(pending_follow.kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_SPURIOUS))
{ {
int printed = 0;
/* If it's a random signal for a non-current thread, notify user
if he's expressed an interest. */
if (ecs->random_signal && signal_print[stop_signal])
{
/* ??rehrauer: I don't understand the rationale for this code. If the
inferior will stop as a result of this signal, then the act of handling
the stop ought to print a message that's couches the stoppage in user
terms, e.g., "Stopped for breakpoint/watchpoint". If the inferior
won't stop as a result of the signal -- i.e., if the signal is merely
a side-effect of something GDB's doing "under the covers" for the
user, such as stepping threads over a breakpoint they shouldn't stop
for -- then the message seems to be a serious annoyance at best.
For now, remove the message altogether. */
#if 0
printed = 1;
target_terminal_ours_for_output ();
printf_filtered ("\nProgram received signal %s, %s.\n",
target_signal_to_name (stop_signal),
target_signal_to_string (stop_signal));
gdb_flush (gdb_stdout);
#endif
}
/* If it's not SIGTRAP and not a signal we want to stop for, then
continue the thread. */
if (stop_signal != TARGET_SIGNAL_TRAP && !signal_stop[stop_signal])
{
if (printed)
target_terminal_inferior ();
/* Clear the signal if it should not be passed. */
if (signal_program[stop_signal] == 0)
stop_signal = TARGET_SIGNAL_0;
target_resume (ecs->ptid, 0, stop_signal);
prepare_to_wait (ecs);
return;
}
/* It's a SIGTRAP or a signal we're interested in. Switch threads,
and fall into the rest of wait_for_inferior(). */
context_switch (ecs); context_switch (ecs);
if (context_hook) if (context_hook)