mirror of
https://github.com/espressif/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-05-29 23:36:06 +08:00
Use gdb_bfd_ref_ptr in target_bfd
I noticed that target_bfd was using manual reference counting for the BFD it held. This patch changes it to use gdb_bfd_ref_ptr instead. Tested by the buildbot. ChangeLog 2018-05-04 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> * bfd-target.c (target_bfd::m_bfd): Now a gdb_bfd_ref_ptr. (target_bfd::target_bfd, target_bfd::~target_bfd): Update.
This commit is contained in:
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
||||
2018-05-04 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* bfd-target.c (target_bfd::m_bfd): Now a gdb_bfd_ref_ptr.
|
||||
(target_bfd::target_bfd, target_bfd::~target_bfd): Update.
|
||||
|
||||
2018-05-04 Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* spu-linux-nat.c (spu_linux_nat_target::wait): Fix syntax error.
|
||||
|
@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ public:
|
||||
|
||||
private:
|
||||
/* The BFD we're wrapping. */
|
||||
struct bfd *m_bfd;
|
||||
gdb_bfd_ref_ptr m_bfd;
|
||||
|
||||
/* The section table build from the ALLOC sections in BFD. Note
|
||||
that we can't rely on extracting the BFD from a random section in
|
||||
@ -90,10 +90,9 @@ target_bfd::get_section_table ()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
target_bfd::target_bfd (struct bfd *abfd)
|
||||
: m_bfd (gdb_bfd_ref_ptr::new_reference (abfd))
|
||||
{
|
||||
this->to_stratum = file_stratum;
|
||||
m_bfd = abfd;
|
||||
gdb_bfd_ref (abfd);
|
||||
m_table.sections = NULL;
|
||||
m_table.sections_end = NULL;
|
||||
build_section_table (abfd, &m_table.sections, &m_table.sections_end);
|
||||
@ -101,7 +100,6 @@ target_bfd::target_bfd (struct bfd *abfd)
|
||||
|
||||
target_bfd::~target_bfd ()
|
||||
{
|
||||
gdb_bfd_unref (m_bfd);
|
||||
xfree (m_table.sections);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user