espressif/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/espressif/binutils-gdb.git synced 2025-06-20 18:08:24 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

* stabs.texinfo: Express disapproval of 'D' symbol descriptor

Browse Source 
politely rather than rudely.
This commit is contained in:
Jim Kingdon
1993-06-22 21:37:32 +00:00
parent 59ba57dad6
commit acf7d010ce
2 changed files with 8 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
Tue Jun 22 16:31:52 1993 Jim Kingdon (kingdon@lioth.cygnus.com)
* stabs.texinfo: Express disapproval of 'D' symbol descriptor
politely rather than rudely.
Mon Jun 21 12:31:01 1993 Jim Kingdon (kingdon@lioth.cygnus.com) Mon Jun 21 12:31:01 1993 Jim Kingdon (kingdon@lioth.cygnus.com)
* snapshots.readme: Tell people to always report missing files. * snapshots.readme: Tell people to always report missing files.

6
gdb/doc/stabs.texinfo
View File

@ -1077,9 +1077,9 @@ same thing, the difference is that @samp{P} is a GNU invention and
handle either one. Symbol type @samp{C_RPSYM} is used with @samp{R} and handle either one. Symbol type @samp{C_RPSYM} is used with @samp{R} and
@samp{N_RSYM} is used with @samp{P}. @samp{N_RSYM} is used with @samp{P}.
AIX, according to the documentation, uses @samp{D} for a parameter According to the AIX documentation symbol descriptor @samp{D} is for a
passed in a floating point register. This strikes me as incredibly parameter passed in a floating point register. This seems
bogus---why doesn't it just use @samp{R} with a register number which unnecessary---why not just use @samp{R} with a register number which
indicates that it's a floating point register? I haven't verified indicates that it's a floating point register? I haven't verified
whether the system actually does what the documentation indicates. whether the system actually does what the documentation indicates.