Fix passing of struct with bitfields on x86-64

Commit 4aa866af ("Fix AMD64 return value ABI in expression
evaluation") introduced a regression when calling a function with a
structure that contains bitfields.

Because the caller of amd64_has_unaligned_fields handles bitfields
already, it seemed to me that the simplest fix was to ignore bitfields
here.

gdb/ChangeLog
2019-04-24  Tom Tromey  <tromey@adacore.com>

	* amd64-tdep.c (amd64_has_unaligned_fields): Ignore bitfields.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2019-04-24  Tom Tromey  <tromey@adacore.com>

	* gdb.arch/amd64-eval.exp: Test bitfield return.
	* gdb.arch/amd64-eval.cc (struct Bitfields): New.
	(class Foo) <return_bitfields>: New method.
	(main): Call it.

gdb/ChangeLog

@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2019-04-24  Tom Tromey  <tromey@adacore.com>
+
+	* amd64-tdep.c (amd64_has_unaligned_fields): Ignore bitfields.
+
 2019-04-23  Andrew Burgess  <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
 
 	* s12z-tdep.c (s12z_unwind_pc): Delete.

gdb/amd64-tdep.c

@@ -555,11 +555,13 @@ amd64_has_unaligned_fields (struct type *type)
 	  int bitpos = TYPE_FIELD_BITPOS (type, i);
 	  int align = type_align(subtype);
 
-	  /* Ignore static fields, or empty fields, for example nested
+	  /* Ignore static fields, empty fields (for example nested
-	     empty structures.  */
+	     empty structures), and bitfields (these are handled by
+	     the caller).  */
 	  if (field_is_static (&TYPE_FIELD (type, i))
 	      || (TYPE_FIELD_BITSIZE (type, i) == 0
-		  && TYPE_LENGTH (subtype) == 0))
+		  && TYPE_LENGTH (subtype) == 0)
+	      || TYPE_FIELD_PACKED (type, i))
 	    continue;
 
 	  if (bitpos % 8 != 0)
@@ -569,7 +571,7 @@ amd64_has_unaligned_fields (struct type *type)
 	  if (bytepos % align != 0)
 	    return true;
 
-	  if (amd64_has_unaligned_fields(subtype))
+	  if (amd64_has_unaligned_fields (subtype))
 	    return true;
 	}
     }

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog

@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2019-04-24  Tom Tromey  <tromey@adacore.com>
+
+	* gdb.arch/amd64-eval.exp: Test bitfield return.
+	* gdb.arch/amd64-eval.cc (struct Bitfields): New.
+	(class Foo) <return_bitfields>: New method.
+	(main): Call it.
+
 2019-04-23  Andrew Burgess  <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
 
 	* gdb.cp/many-args.cc: New file.

gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-eval.cc

@@ -63,6 +63,16 @@ struct UnalignedFieldsInBase : public UnalignedFields
   int32_t x2;
 };
 
+struct Bitfields
+{
+  Bitfields(unsigned int x, unsigned int y)
+    : fld(x), fld2(y)
+  {}
+
+  unsigned fld : 7;
+  unsigned fld2 : 7;
+};
+
 class Foo
 {
 public:
@@ -101,6 +111,13 @@ public:
     return UnalignedFieldsInBase (x, y, x2);
   }
 
+  Bitfields
+  return_bitfields (unsigned int x, unsigned int y)
+  {
+    assert (this->tag == EXPECTED_TAG);
+    return Bitfields(x, y);
+  }
+
 private:
   /* Use a tag to detect if the "this" value is correct.  */
   static const int EXPECTED_TAG = 0xF00F00F0;
@@ -116,5 +133,6 @@ main (int argc, char *argv[])
   foo.return_non_trivial_destructor(3);
   foo.return_unaligned(4, 5);
   foo.return_unaligned_in_base(6, 7, 8);
+  foo.return_bitfields(23, 74);
   return 0;  // break-here
 }

gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-eval.exp

@@ -41,3 +41,5 @@ gdb_test "call foo.return_unaligned(78, 9.25)" \
     " = {x = 78, y = 9.25}"
 gdb_test "call foo.return_unaligned_in_base(23, 4.5, 67)" \
     " = {<UnalignedFields> = {x = 23, y = 4.5}, x2 = 67}"
+gdb_test "call foo.return_bitfields(23, 74)" \
+    " = {fld = 23, fld2 = 74}"