espressif/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/espressif/binutils-gdb.git synced 2025-06-17 16:05:56 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

gdb/

Browse Source 
* gdbthread.h (currently_stepping): New declaration.
	* infrun.c (currently_stepping): Remove the forward declaration.
	(currently_stepping): Make it global.
	* linux-nat.c (resume_callback) <lp->stopped && lp->status == 0>: New
	variables tp and step, initialized them.  Pass STEP to to_resume.
	Print also possibly "PTRACE_SINGLESTEP" if STEP.  Initialize LP->STEP.
	* remote.c (currently_stepping_callback): New.
	(remote_vcont_resume)
	<ptid_equal (ptid, minus_one_ptid) || ptid_is_pid (ptid)>:
	New variable tp.  Call currently_stepping_callback and step such
	thread.

gdb/testsuite/
	* gdb.threads/sigstep-threads.exp: New file.
	* gdb.threads/sigstep-threads.c: New file.
This commit is contained in:
Jan Kratochvil
2010-10-17 18:24:47 +00:00
parent c1e5657246
commit 8aeb23f364
8 changed files with 175 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
gdb/infrun.c
View File

@ -74,8 +74,6 @@ static int follow_fork (void);
static void set_schedlock_func (char *args, int from_tty,
struct cmd_list_element *c);
static int currently_stepping (struct thread_info *tp);
static int currently_stepping_or_nexting_callback (struct thread_info *tp,
void *data);
@ -4851,7 +4849,7 @@ infrun: not switching back to stepped thread, it has vanished\n");
/* Is thread TP in the middle of single-stepping? */
static int
int
currently_stepping (struct thread_info *tp)
{
return ((tp->step_range_end && tp->step_resume_breakpoint == NULL)