espressif/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/espressif/binutils-gdb.git synced 2025-06-20 09:58:19 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

2000-03-27 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>

Browse Source 
* config/i386/tm-i386.h: Fix typo.  It is TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BIT
	instead of TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BITS.
	* config/i386/tm-i386mk.h: Likewise.
This commit is contained in:
Mark Kettenis
2000-03-26 22:10:59 +00:00
parent ac27f131b2
commit 6e2e8c243b
3 changed files with 9 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
gdb/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
2000-03-27 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
* config/i386/tm-i386.h: Fix typo. It is TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BIT
instead of TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BITS.
* config/i386/tm-i386mk.h: Likewise.
2000-03-26 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org> 2000-03-26 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
Provide `long double' support for most i386 targets. Provide `long double' support for most i386 targets.

2
gdb/config/i386/tm-i386.h
View File

@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct type;
bits, a `long double' actually takes up 96, probably to enforce bits, a `long double' actually takes up 96, probably to enforce
alignment. */ alignment. */
#define TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BITS 96 #define TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BIT 96
/* Used for example in valprint.c:print_floating() to enable checking /* Used for example in valprint.c:print_floating() to enable checking
for NaN's */ for NaN's */

4
gdb/config/i386/tm-i386mk.h
View File

@ -29,10 +29,10 @@
to `double'. However, I'm not sure what is the consequence of: to `double'. However, I'm not sure what is the consequence of:
#define TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_FORMAT TARGET_DOUBLE_FORMAT #define TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_FORMAT TARGET_DOUBLE_FORMAT
#define TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BITS TARGET_DOUBLE_BITS #define TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BIT TARGET_DOUBLE_BIT
So I'll go with the current status quo instead. It looks like this So I'll go with the current status quo instead. It looks like this
target won't compile anyway. Perhaps it should be obsoleted? */ target won't compile anyway. Perhaps it should be obsoleted? */
#undef TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_FORMAT #undef TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_FORMAT
#undef TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BITS #undef TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_BIT