mirror of
https://github.com/espressif/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-10-17 12:53:17 +08:00
Make "bt N" print correct number of frames when using a frame filter
PR python/16497 notes that using "bt" with a positive argument prints the wrong number of frames when a frame filter is in use. Also, in this case, the non-frame-filter path will print a message about "More stack frames" when there are more; but this is not done in the frame-filter case. The first problem is that backtrace_command_1 passes the wrong value to apply_ext_lang_frame_filter -- that function takes the final frame's number as an argument, but backtrace_command_1 passes the count, which is off by one. The solution to the second problem is to have the C stack-printing code stop at the correct number of frames and then print the message. Tested using the buildbot. ChangeLog 2018-02-26 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR python/16497: * stack.c (backtrace_command_1): Set PRINT_MORE_FRAMES flag. Fix off-by-one in py_end computation. * python/py-framefilter.c (gdbpy_apply_frame_filter): Handle PRINT_MORE_FRAMES. * extension.h (enum frame_filter_flags) <PRINT_MORE_FRAMES>: New constant. 2018-02-26 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR python/16497: * gdb.python/py-framefilter.exp: Update test.
This commit is contained in:
@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ gdb_test "bt -2" \
|
||||
".*#26.*func5.*#27.*in main \\(\\).*" \
|
||||
"bt -2 with frame-filter Reverse disabled"
|
||||
gdb_test "bt 3" \
|
||||
".*#0.*end_func.*#1.*in funca \\(\\).*#2.*in funcb \\(j=10\\).*" \
|
||||
".*#0.*end_func.*#1.*in funca \\(\\).*#2.*in funcb \\(j=10\\)\[^#\]*More stack frames follow.*" \
|
||||
"bt 3 with frame-filter Reverse disabled"
|
||||
gdb_test "bt no-filter full" \
|
||||
".*#0.*end_func.*str = $hex \"The End\".*st2 = $hex \"Is Near\".*b = 12.*c = 5.*#1.*in funca \\(\\).*#2.*in funcb \\(j=10\\).*bar = \{a = 42, b = 84\}.*" \
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user