espressif/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/espressif/binutils-gdb.git synced 2025-06-27 22:48:57 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Replace useless FRAME, FRAME_ADDR types with struct frame_info *

Browse Source 
and CORE_ADDR, respectively.
	* frame.h (FRAME, FRAME_INFO_ID, FRAME_ADDR): Remove.
	* blockframe.c (get_frame_info): Remove.
	* a29k-tdep.c, alpha-tdep.c, blockframe.c, breakpoint.c,
	breakpoint.h, energize.c, findvar.c, gdbtk.c, gould-pinsn.c,
	h8300-tdep.c, h8500-tdep.c, hppa-tdep.c, i386-tdep.c, i960-tdep.c,
	infcmd.c, inferior.h, infrun.c, m68k-tdep.c, m88k-tdep.c,
	mips-tdep.c, nindy-tdep.c, printcmd.c, pyr-tdep.c, rs6000-tdep.c,
	sh-tdep.c, sparc-tdep.c, stack.c, valops.c, z8k-tdep.c,
	config/a29k/tm-a29k.h, config/alpha/tm-alpha.h,
	config/gould/tm-pn.h, config/h8300/tm-h8300.h,
	config/h8500/tm-h8500.h, config/mips/tm-mips.h,
	config/ns32k/tm-merlin.h, config/ns32k/tm-umax.h,
	config/pyr/tm-pyr.h, config/sparc/tm-sparc.h): Replace FRAME with
	struct frame_info * everywhere, replace FRAME_ADDR with CORE_ADDR,
	rename variables consistently (using `frame' or `fi'), remove
	calls to get_frame_info and FRAME_INFO_ID, remove comments about
	FRAME and FRAME_ADDR cruftiness.
This commit is contained in:
Stan Shebs
1994-11-04 01:19:29 +00:00
parent 0128cbae50
commit 669caa9c19
20 changed files with 336 additions and 331 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

55
gdb/m88k-tdep.c
View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* Target-machine dependent code for Motorola 88000 series, for GDB.
Copyright (C) 1988, 1990, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Copyright (C) 1988, 1990, 1991, 1994 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of GDB.
@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. */
#include "inferior.h"
#include "value.h"
#include "gdbcore.h"
#include "symtab.h"
#include "setjmp.h"
#include "value.h"
@ -32,8 +31,9 @@ Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. */
void frame_find_saved_regs ();
/* is this target an m88110? Otherwise assume m88100. This has
relevance for the ways in which we screw with instruction pointers. */
/* Is this target an m88110? Otherwise assume m88100. This has
relevance for the ways in which we screw with instruction pointers. */
int target_is_m88110 = 0;
/* Given a GDB frame, determine the address of the calling function's frame.
@ -43,9 +43,9 @@ int target_is_m88110 = 0;
For us, the frame address is its stack pointer value, so we look up
the function prologue to determine the caller's sp value, and return it. */
FRAME_ADDR
CORE_ADDR
frame_chain (thisframe)
FRAME thisframe;
struct frame_info *thisframe;
{
frame_find_saved_regs (thisframe, (struct frame_saved_regs *) 0);
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ frame_chain (thisframe)
int
frameless_function_invocation (frame)
FRAME frame;
struct frame_info *frame;
{
frame_find_saved_regs (frame, (struct frame_saved_regs *) 0);
@ -74,13 +74,13 @@ frameless_function_invocation (frame)
}
void
init_extra_frame_info (fromleaf, fi)
init_extra_frame_info (fromleaf, frame)
int fromleaf;
struct frame_info *fi;
struct frame_info *frame;
{
fi->fsr = 0; /* Not yet allocated */
fi->args_pointer = 0; /* Unknown */
fi->locals_pointer = 0; /* Unknown */
frame->fsr = 0; /* Not yet allocated */
frame->args_pointer = 0; /* Unknown */
frame->locals_pointer = 0; /* Unknown */
}
/* Examine an m88k function prologue, recording the addresses at which
@ -204,14 +204,15 @@ next_insn (memaddr, pword1)
/* Read a register from frames called by us (or from the hardware regs). */
static int
read_next_frame_reg(fi, regno)
FRAME fi;
read_next_frame_reg(frame, regno)
struct frame_info *frame;
int regno;
{
for (; fi; fi = fi->next) {
if (regno == SP_REGNUM) return fi->frame;
else if (fi->fsr->regs[regno])
return read_memory_integer(fi->fsr->regs[regno], 4);
for (; frame; frame = frame->next) {
if (regno == SP_REGNUM)
return FRAME_FP (frame);
else if (frame->fsr->regs[regno])
return read_memory_integer(frame->fsr->regs[regno], 4);
}
return read_register(regno);
}
@ -229,7 +230,7 @@ static CORE_ADDR
examine_prologue (ip, limit, frame_sp, fsr, fi)
register CORE_ADDR ip;
register CORE_ADDR limit;
FRAME_ADDR frame_sp;
CORE_ADDR frame_sp;
struct frame_saved_regs *fsr;
struct frame_info *fi;
{
@ -395,7 +396,7 @@ skip_prologue (ip)
sal = find_pc_line (ip, 0);
limit = (sal.end) ? sal.end : 0xffffffff;
return (examine_prologue (ip, limit, (FRAME_ADDR) 0, &saved_regs_dummy,
return (examine_prologue (ip, limit, (CORE_ADDR) 0, &saved_regs_dummy,
(struct frame_info *)0 ));
}
@ -502,7 +503,7 @@ frame_args_address (fi)
CORE_ADDR
frame_saved_pc (frame)
FRAME frame;
struct frame_info *frame;
{
return read_next_frame_reg(frame, SRP_REGNUM);
}
@ -559,17 +560,15 @@ m88k_push_dummy_frame()
void
pop_frame ()
{
register FRAME frame = get_current_frame ();
register struct frame_info *frame = get_current_frame ();
register CORE_ADDR fp;
register int regnum;
struct frame_saved_regs fsr;
struct frame_info *fi;
fi = get_frame_info (frame);
fp = fi -> frame;
get_frame_saved_regs (fi, &fsr);
fp = FRAME_FP (frame);
get_frame_saved_regs (frame, &fsr);
if (PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (read_pc(), read_register(SP_REGNUM), FRAME_FP(fi)))
if (PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (read_pc (), read_register (SP_REGNUM), FRAME_FP (fi)))
{
/* FIXME: I think get_frame_saved_regs should be handling this so
that we can deal with the saved registers properly (e.g. frame
@ -605,7 +604,7 @@ pop_frame ()
if (fsr.regs[regnum])
write_register (regnum,
read_memory_integer (fsr.regs[regnum], 4));
write_pc(frame_saved_pc(frame));
write_pc (frame_saved_pc (frame));
}
reinit_frame_cache ();
}