espressif/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/espressif/binutils-gdb.git synced 2025-06-22 19:09:31 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Use pc-relative relocation instead of an absolute relocation for x86_64-pc-mingw32 target.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Nick Clifton
2007-03-16 15:13:21 +00:00
parent 29975052f1
commit 591a748af9
6 changed files with 79 additions and 34 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

39
ld/ldlang.c
View File

@ -4706,7 +4706,10 @@ lang_size_sections_1
return dot;
}
/* Callback routine that is used in _bfd_elf_map_sections_to_segments. */
/* Callback routine that is used in _bfd_elf_map_sections_to_segments.
The BFD library has set NEW_SEGMENT to TRUE iff it thinks that
CURRENT_SECTION and PREVIOUS_SECTION ought to be placed into different
segments. We are allowed an opportunity to override this decision. */
bfd_boolean
ldlang_override_segment_assignment (struct bfd_link_info * info ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
@ -4717,7 +4720,9 @@ ldlang_override_segment_assignment (struct bfd_link_info * info ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED
{
lang_output_section_statement_type * cur;
lang_output_section_statement_type * prev;
/* The checks below are only necessary when the BFD library has decided
that the two sections ought to be placed into the same segment. */
if (new_segment)
return TRUE;
@ -4728,16 +4733,17 @@ ldlang_override_segment_assignment (struct bfd_link_info * info ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED
/* Find the memory regions associated with the two sections.
We call lang_output_section_find() here rather than scanning the list
of output sections looking for a matching section pointer because if
we have a large number of sections a hash lookup is faster. */
we have a large number of sections then a hash lookup is faster. */
cur = lang_output_section_find (current_section->name);
prev = lang_output_section_find (previous_section->name);
/* More paranoia. */
if (cur == NULL || prev == NULL)
return new_segment;
/* If the regions are different then force the sections to live in
different segments. See the email thread starting here for the
reasons why this is necessary:
different segments. See the email thread starting at the following
URL for the reasons why this is necessary:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-02/msg00216.html */
return cur->region != prev->region;
}
@ -6211,6 +6217,7 @@ lang_record_phdrs (void)
alc = 10;
secs = xmalloc (alc * sizeof (asection *));
last = NULL;
for (l = lang_phdr_list; l != NULL; l = l->next)
{
unsigned int c;
@ -6236,7 +6243,26 @@ lang_record_phdrs (void)
|| os->bfd_section == NULL
|| (os->bfd_section->flags & SEC_ALLOC) == 0)
continue;
pl = last;
if (last)
pl = last;
else
{
lang_output_section_statement_type * tmp_os;
/* If we have not run across a section with a program
header assigned to it yet, then scan forwards to find
one. This prevents inconsistencies in the linker's
behaviour when a script has specified just a single
header and there are sections in that script which are
not assigned to it, and which occur before the first
use of that header. See here for more details:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-02/msg00291.html */
for (tmp_os = os; tmp_os; tmp_os = tmp_os->next)
if (tmp_os->phdrs)
break;
pl = tmp_os->phdrs;
}
}
if (os->bfd_section == NULL)
@ -6468,7 +6494,6 @@ lang_leave_overlay (etree_type *lma_expr,
an LMA region was specified. */
if (l->next == 0)
l->os->load_base = lma_expr;
if (phdrs != NULL && l->os->phdrs == NULL)
l->os->phdrs = phdrs;