espressif/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/espressif/binutils-gdb.git synced 2025-06-28 15:18:37 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

detach in all-stop with threads running

Browse Source 
A following patch will add a testcase that has a number of threads
constantly stepping over a breakpoint, and then has GDB detach the
process, while threads are running.  If we have more than one inferior
running, and we detach from just one of the inferiors, we expect that
the remaining inferior continues running.  However, in all-stop, if
GDB needs to pause the target for the detach, nothing is re-resuming
the other inferiors after the detach.  "info threads" shows the
threads as running, but they really aren't.  This fixes it.

gdb/ChangeLog:

	* infcmd.c (detach_command): Hold strong reference to target, and
	if all-stop on entry, restart threads on exit.
	* infrun.c (switch_back_to_stepped_thread): Factor out bits to ...
	(restart_stepped_thread): ... this new function.  Also handle
	trap_expected.
	(restart_after_all_stop_detach): New function.
	* infrun.h (restart_after_all_stop_detach): Declare.
This commit is contained in:
Pedro Alves
2021-01-11 20:01:58 +00:00
parent ac7d717c1e
commit 408f66864a
4 changed files with 149 additions and 63 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

185
gdb/infrun.c
View File

@ -7110,6 +7110,9 @@ process_event_stop_test (struct execution_control_state *ecs)
keep_going (ecs);
}
static bool restart_stepped_thread (process_stratum_target *resume_target,
ptid_t resume_ptid);
/* In all-stop mode, if we're currently stepping but have stopped in
some other thread, we may need to switch back to the stepped
thread. Returns true we set the inferior running, false if we left
@ -7120,8 +7123,6 @@ switch_back_to_stepped_thread (struct execution_control_state *ecs)
{
if (!target_is_non_stop_p ())
{
struct thread_info *stepping_thread;
/* If any thread is blocked on some internal breakpoint, and we
simply need to step over that breakpoint to get it going
again, do that first. */
@ -7184,78 +7185,136 @@ switch_back_to_stepped_thread (struct execution_control_state *ecs)
if (!signal_program[ecs->event_thread->suspend.stop_signal])
ecs->event_thread->suspend.stop_signal = GDB_SIGNAL_0;
/* Do all pending step-overs before actually proceeding with
step/next/etc. */
if (start_step_over ())
if (restart_stepped_thread (ecs->target, ecs->ptid))
{
prepare_to_wait (ecs);
return true;
}
/* Look for the stepping/nexting thread. */
stepping_thread = NULL;
for (thread_info *tp : all_non_exited_threads ())
{
switch_to_thread_no_regs (tp);
/* Ignore threads of processes the caller is not
resuming. */
if (!sched_multi
&& (tp->inf->process_target () != ecs->target
|| tp->inf->pid != ecs->ptid.pid ()))
continue;
/* When stepping over a breakpoint, we lock all threads
except the one that needs to move past the breakpoint.
If a non-event thread has this set, the "incomplete
step-over" check above should have caught it earlier. */
if (tp->control.trap_expected)
{
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
"[%s] has inconsistent state: "
"trap_expected=%d\n",
target_pid_to_str (tp->ptid).c_str (),
tp->control.trap_expected);
}
/* Did we find the stepping thread? */
if (tp->control.step_range_end)
{
/* Yep. There should only one though. */
gdb_assert (stepping_thread == NULL);
/* The event thread is handled at the top, before we
enter this loop. */
gdb_assert (tp != ecs->event_thread);
/* If some thread other than the event thread is
stepping, then scheduler locking can't be in effect,
otherwise we wouldn't have resumed the current event
thread in the first place. */
gdb_assert (!schedlock_applies (tp));
stepping_thread = tp;
}
}
if (stepping_thread != NULL)
{
infrun_debug_printf ("switching back to stepped thread");
if (keep_going_stepped_thread (stepping_thread))
{
prepare_to_wait (ecs);
return true;
}
}
switch_to_thread (ecs->event_thread);
}
return false;
}
/* Look for the thread that was stepping, and resume it.
RESUME_TARGET / RESUME_PTID indicate the set of threads the caller
is resuming. Return true if a thread was started, false
otherwise. */
static bool
restart_stepped_thread (process_stratum_target *resume_target,
ptid_t resume_ptid)
{
/* Do all pending step-overs before actually proceeding with
step/next/etc. */
if (start_step_over ())
return true;
for (thread_info *tp : all_threads_safe ())
{
if (tp->state == THREAD_EXITED)
continue;
if (tp->suspend.waitstatus_pending_p)
continue;
/* Ignore threads of processes the caller is not
resuming. */
if (!sched_multi
&& (tp->inf->process_target () != resume_target
|| tp->inf->pid != resume_ptid.pid ()))
continue;
if (tp->control.trap_expected)
{
infrun_debug_printf ("switching back to stepped thread (step-over)");
if (keep_going_stepped_thread (tp))
return true;
}
}
for (thread_info *tp : all_threads_safe ())
{
if (tp->state == THREAD_EXITED)
continue;
if (tp->suspend.waitstatus_pending_p)
continue;
/* Ignore threads of processes the caller is not
resuming. */
if (!sched_multi
&& (tp->inf->process_target () != resume_target
|| tp->inf->pid != resume_ptid.pid ()))
continue;
/* Did we find the stepping thread? */
if (tp->control.step_range_end)
{
infrun_debug_printf ("switching back to stepped thread (stepping)");
if (keep_going_stepped_thread (tp))
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
/* See infrun.h. */
void
restart_after_all_stop_detach (process_stratum_target *proc_target)
{
/* Note we don't check target_is_non_stop_p() here, because the
current inferior may no longer have a process_stratum target
pushed, as we just detached. */
/* See if we have a THREAD_RUNNING thread that need to be
re-resumed. If we have any thread that is already executing,
then we don't need to resume the target -- it is already been
resumed. With the remote target (in all-stop), it's even
impossible to issue another resumption if the target is already
resumed, until the target reports a stop. */
for (thread_info *thr : all_threads (proc_target))
{
if (thr->state != THREAD_RUNNING)
continue;
/* If we have any thread that is already executing, then we
don't need to resume the target -- it is already been
resumed. */
if (thr->executing)
return;
/* If we have a pending event to process, skip resuming the
target and go straight to processing it. */
if (thr->resumed && thr->suspend.waitstatus_pending_p)
return;
}
/* Alright, we need to re-resume the target. If a thread was
stepping, we need to restart it stepping. */
if (restart_stepped_thread (proc_target, minus_one_ptid))
return;
/* Otherwise, find the first THREAD_RUNNING thread and resume
it. */
for (thread_info *thr : all_threads (proc_target))
{
if (thr->state != THREAD_RUNNING)
continue;
execution_control_state ecs;
reset_ecs (&ecs, thr);
switch_to_thread (thr);
keep_going (&ecs);
return;
}
}
/* Set a previously stepped thread back to stepping. Returns true on
success, false if the resume is not possible (e.g., the thread
vanished). */