mirror of
https://github.com/espressif/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-08-06 06:45:56 +08:00
PR remote/19496, timeout in forking-threads-plus-bkpt
This patch addresses a failure in gdb.threads/forking-threads-plus-breakpoint.exp: FAIL: gdb.threads/forking-threads-plus-breakpoint.exp: cond_bp_target=1: detach_on_fork=on: inferior 1 exited (timeout) Cause: A fork event was reported to GDB before GDB knew about the parent thread, followed immediately by a breakpoint event in a different thread. The parent thread was subsequently added via remote_notice_new_inferior in process_stop_reply, but when the thread was added the thread_info.state was set to THREAD_STOPPED. The fork event was then handled correctly, but when the fork parent was resumed via a call to keep_going, the state was unchanged. The breakpoint event was then handled, which caused all the non-breakpoint threads to be stopped. When the breakpoint thread was resumed, all the non-breakpoint threads were resumed via infrun.c:restart_threads. Our old fork parent wasn't restarted, because it still had thread_info.state set to THREAD_STOPPED. Ultimately the program under debug hung waiting for a pthread_join while the old fork parent was stopped forever by GDB. Fix: Since this is non-stop, then the bug is that the thread should have been added in THREAD_RUNNING state. Consider that infrun may be pulling target events out of the target_ops backend into its own event queue, but, not process them immediately. E.g., infrun may be stopping all threads temporarily for a step-over-breakpoint operation for thread A (stop_all_threads). The waitstatus of all threads is thus left pending in the thread structure (save_status), including the fork event of thread B. Right at this point, if the user does "info threads", that should show thread B (the fork parent) running, not stopped, even if internally, gdb is holding it paused for a little bit. Thus if in non-stop mode, always add new threads in the external user-visible THREAD_RUNNING state. Change remote_notice_new_inferior to accept the internal executing state of the thread instead, with EXECUTING set to 1 when we discover a thread that is running on the target (such as through remote_update_thread_list), and 0 when the thread is really paused (such as when we see a stop reply). Tested on x86_64 Linux and Nios II Linux target with x86 Linux host. gdb/ChangeLog: 2016-03-17 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> Don Breazeal <donb@codesourcery.com> PR remote/19496 * infcmd.c (notice_new_inferior): Use the 'leave_running' argument instead of checking the 'non_stop' global. * remote.c (remote_add_thread): New parameter 'executing'. Use it to set the new thread's executing state. (remote_notice_new_inferior): Rename parameter 'running' to 'executing'. Always set the thread state to THREAD_RUNNING in non-stop mode, and to THREAD_STOPPED in all-stop mode. Pass EXECUTING to remote_add_thread and notice_new_inferior. (remote_update_thread_list): Update to pass executing state, not running state.
This commit is contained in:
@ -2903,11 +2903,7 @@ notice_new_inferior (ptid_t ptid, int leave_running, int from_tty)
|
||||
|
||||
old_chain = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
/* If in non-stop, leave threads as running as they were. If
|
||||
they're stopped for some reason other than us telling it to, the
|
||||
target reports a signal != GDB_SIGNAL_0. We don't try to
|
||||
resume threads with such a stop signal. */
|
||||
mode = non_stop ? ATTACH_POST_WAIT_RESUME : ATTACH_POST_WAIT_NOTHING;
|
||||
mode = leave_running ? ATTACH_POST_WAIT_RESUME : ATTACH_POST_WAIT_NOTHING;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!ptid_equal (inferior_ptid, null_ptid))
|
||||
make_cleanup_restore_current_thread ();
|
||||
@ -2943,7 +2939,6 @@ notice_new_inferior (ptid_t ptid, int leave_running, int from_tty)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mode = leave_running ? ATTACH_POST_WAIT_RESUME : ATTACH_POST_WAIT_NOTHING;
|
||||
attach_post_wait ("" /* args */, from_tty, mode);
|
||||
|
||||
do_cleanups (old_chain);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user