mirror of
https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/JavaScript.git
synced 2025-07-20 02:23:24 +08:00
86d333ee94
* chore: Switch to Node 20 + Vitest * chore: migrate to vitest mock functions * chore: code style (switch to prettier) * test: re-enable long-running test Seems the switch to Node 20 and Vitest has vastly improved the code's and / or the test's runtime! see #1193 * chore: code style * chore: fix failing tests * Updated Documentation in README.md * Update contribution guidelines to state usage of Prettier * fix: set prettier printWidth back to 80 * chore: apply updated code style automatically * fix: set prettier line endings to lf again * chore: apply updated code style automatically --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions <${GITHUB_ACTOR}@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Lars Müller <34514239+appgurueu@users.noreply.github.com>
108 lines
2.8 KiB
JavaScript
108 lines
2.8 KiB
JavaScript
import { RatInAMaze } from '../RatInAMaze'
|
|
|
|
describe('RatInAMaze', () => {
|
|
it('should fail for non-arrays', () => {
|
|
const values = [undefined, null, {}, 42, 'hello, world']
|
|
|
|
for (const value of values) {
|
|
// we deliberately want to check whether this constructor call fails or not
|
|
// eslint-disable-next-line no-new
|
|
expect(() => {
|
|
new RatInAMaze(value)
|
|
}).toThrow()
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should fail for an empty array', () => {
|
|
// we deliberately want to check whether this constructor call fails or not
|
|
// eslint-disable-next-line no-new
|
|
expect(() => {
|
|
new RatInAMaze([])
|
|
}).toThrow()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should fail for a non-square array', () => {
|
|
const array = [
|
|
[0, 0, 0],
|
|
[0, 0]
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
// we deliberately want to check whether this constructor call fails or not
|
|
// eslint-disable-next-line no-new
|
|
expect(() => {
|
|
new RatInAMaze(array)
|
|
}).toThrow()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should fail for arrays containing invalid values', () => {
|
|
const values = [[[2]], [['a']]]
|
|
|
|
for (const value of values) {
|
|
// we deliberately want to check whether this constructor call fails or not
|
|
// eslint-disable-next-line no-new
|
|
expect(() => {
|
|
new RatInAMaze(value)
|
|
}).toThrow()
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should work for a single-cell maze', () => {
|
|
const maze = new RatInAMaze([[1]])
|
|
expect(maze.solved).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(maze.path).toBe('')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should work for a single-cell maze that can not be solved', () => {
|
|
const maze = new RatInAMaze([[0]])
|
|
expect(maze.solved).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(maze.path).toBe('')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should work for a simple 3x3 maze', () => {
|
|
const maze = new RatInAMaze([
|
|
[1, 1, 0],
|
|
[0, 1, 0],
|
|
[0, 1, 1]
|
|
])
|
|
expect(maze.solved).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(maze.path).toBe('RDDR')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should work for a simple 2x2 that can not be solved', () => {
|
|
const maze = new RatInAMaze([
|
|
[1, 0],
|
|
[0, 1]
|
|
])
|
|
expect(maze.solved).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(maze.path).toBe('')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should work for a more complex maze', () => {
|
|
const maze = new RatInAMaze([
|
|
[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0],
|
|
[0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0],
|
|
[1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0],
|
|
[1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0],
|
|
[1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0],
|
|
[1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
|
|
[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
|
|
])
|
|
expect(maze.solved).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(maze.path).toBe('RRRRDDDDLLUULLDDDDRRRRRR')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should work for a more complex maze that can not be solved', () => {
|
|
const maze = new RatInAMaze([
|
|
[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1],
|
|
[0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1],
|
|
[1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1],
|
|
[1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1],
|
|
[1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1],
|
|
[1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
|
|
[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
|
|
])
|
|
expect(maze.solved).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(maze.path).toBe('')
|
|
})
|
|
})
|