Files
JavaScript/Maths/test/IsPronic.test.js
Roland Hummel 86d333ee94 feat: Test running overhaul, switch to Prettier & reformat everything (#1407)
* chore: Switch to Node 20 + Vitest

* chore: migrate to vitest mock functions

* chore: code style (switch to prettier)

* test: re-enable long-running test

Seems the switch to Node 20 and Vitest has vastly improved the code's and / or the test's runtime!

see #1193

* chore: code style

* chore: fix failing tests

* Updated Documentation in README.md

* Update contribution guidelines to state usage of Prettier

* fix: set prettier printWidth back to 80

* chore: apply updated code style automatically

* fix: set prettier line endings to lf again

* chore: apply updated code style automatically

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions <${GITHUB_ACTOR}@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lars Müller <34514239+appgurueu@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-10-04 02:38:19 +05:30

18 lines
570 B
JavaScript

import { isPronic } from '../IsPronic'
const pronicNumbers = [
0, 2, 6, 12, 20, 30, 42, 56, 72, 90, 110, 132, 156, 182, 210, 240, 272, 306,
342, 380, 420, 462, 506, 552, 600, 650, 702, 756, 812, 870, 930, 992, 1056,
1122, 1190, 1260, 1332, 1406, 1482, 1560, 1640, 1722, 1806, 1892, 1980, 2070,
2162, 2256, 2352, 2450, 2550
]
describe('Testing isPronic function', () => {
for (let i = 0; i <= 2500; i++) {
it('should return true', () => {
const isPronicNumber = isPronic(i)
expect(isPronicNumber).toBe(pronicNumbers.includes(i))
})
}
})