Files
JavaScript/Maths/test/ExtendedEuclideanGCD.test.js
Roland Hummel 86d333ee94 feat: Test running overhaul, switch to Prettier & reformat everything (#1407)
* chore: Switch to Node 20 + Vitest

* chore: migrate to vitest mock functions

* chore: code style (switch to prettier)

* test: re-enable long-running test

Seems the switch to Node 20 and Vitest has vastly improved the code's and / or the test's runtime!

see #1193

* chore: code style

* chore: fix failing tests

* Updated Documentation in README.md

* Update contribution guidelines to state usage of Prettier

* fix: set prettier printWidth back to 80

* chore: apply updated code style automatically

* fix: set prettier line endings to lf again

* chore: apply updated code style automatically

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions <${GITHUB_ACTOR}@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lars Müller <34514239+appgurueu@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-10-04 02:38:19 +05:30

25 lines
899 B
JavaScript

import { extendedEuclideanGCD } from '../ExtendedEuclideanGCD'
describe('extendedEuclideanGCD', () => {
it('should return valid values in order for positive arguments', () => {
expect(extendedEuclideanGCD(240, 46)).toMatchObject([2, -9, 47])
expect(extendedEuclideanGCD(46, 240)).toMatchObject([2, 47, -9])
})
it('should give error on non-positive arguments', () => {
expect(() => extendedEuclideanGCD(0, 240)).toThrowError(
new TypeError('Must be positive numbers')
)
expect(() => extendedEuclideanGCD(46, -240)).toThrowError(
new TypeError('Must be positive numbers')
)
})
it('should give error on non-numeric arguments', () => {
expect(() => extendedEuclideanGCD('240', 46)).toThrowError(
new TypeError('Not a Number')
)
expect(() => extendedEuclideanGCD([240, 46])).toThrowError(
new TypeError('Not a Number')
)
})
})